Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
said that it ought to be understood as a call for tolerance toward other
views. But those adolescents did not listen anymore. No sooner had I
embarked on my way back to our car than these youngsters suddenly
came running after me yelling words like “Beat the Nazi!”
Back then we had the two sons of said acquaintance with us, who
were of a similar age as those adolescents. The two boys were truly
shocked about such aggressiveness of the other youngsters. Without
assistance from us they stated dryly that children and adolescents are
educated to hatred and intolerance in this museum – and very specifically
so against Germans in general and against historical dissidents on this
topic in particular.
All three examples prove that the Holocaust propaganda permanently
going on in western countries – no matter whether based on truth or
falsehood – is nothing else but a gigantic incitement of the peoples of
the world against the German people. This is even true for Germany,
where the population’s mind is filled with hatred against everything
German; or in other words: in this country Germans’ minds are being
filled with hatred against themselves.
Hence, if you are searching for persons poisoning people’s minds
and for individuals and institutions traumatizing adolescents and perverting
them into socially incompetent humans, maybe you should for
once look into the other direction. We revisionists do not traumatize
anybody with our media, and you cannot find any depictions of violence
or the glorification of it either.
In the context of attempts by the German Assessment Agency to index
a revisionist book on the causes of World War II, the administrative
court of Cologne has decided that such a censorship is unlawful. Shortly
thereafter this verdict was confirmed by Germany’s Constitutional High
Court with a decision from which I have quoted already early in connection
with the definition of science. I may now quote from the decision
of the administrative court: 153
“The Federal Assessment Agency ignores that it is exactly the
possibility of an open dispute between different opinions which supports
the critical faculties of adolescents, which requires a free discussion.
Apart from the conveyance of historical knowledge this
downright requires the critical contention with deviating opinions.
153 Administrative Court Cologne, confirmed by BVerfG, ref. 17 K 9534/94, re. Udo Walendy,
Wahrheit für Deutschland, Verlag für Volkstum und Zeitgeschichtsforschung, Vlotho 1964;
Engl.: Truth for Germany, ibid. 1981.
134