08.03.2013 Views

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY<br />

sions which we would not want to abandon. But how are we to change<br />

our views if we are not confronted by arguments but by mere violence?<br />

That really is not a convincing way. Thusly tagged with a unpropitious<br />

social prognosis, we political prisoners can never enjoy early releases<br />

from prison after spending half or two-thirds of our terms, as is granted<br />

to drug dealers, robbers, thieves, and murderers. No, as incorrigibles we<br />

have to spend our terms to the last minute. To top it off, we are<br />

whacked with all kinds of security measures in prison, which exacerbate<br />

life in prison even more. I have still not received any comprehensible<br />

explanation why that is so, though. Do the other prisoners have to be<br />

protected from our thoughts? Or are we taken into protective custody in<br />

order to safeguard us against the other prisoners whose hatred against us<br />

has been fanned by media reports? Be that as it may, fact is that the reason<br />

occasionally given to the public for the harsh punishment meted out<br />

against us is that it is meant to be a deterrent in order that no underling<br />

in this country will dare to utter an opinion divergent from that of the<br />

government. In legalese this term is called “general prevention.” According<br />

to Solzhenitsyn such verdicts in the late Soviet Union were<br />

called “social prophylaxis,” 138 which probably amounts to the same<br />

thing.<br />

III. Development of the Law<br />

Now I want to turn to the development of the law in Germany under<br />

the aspect of the increasing deterioration of civil rights. I may start with<br />

a quote from the speech of the late German political scientist Carlo<br />

Schmid, who, as a Social Democrat, was a member of Germany’s Parliamentary<br />

Council in 1948, which at that time was debating the Basic<br />

Law for the fledgling Federal German Republic. On the question of restrictions<br />

to civil right by general laws Schmid said on 8 September<br />

1948: 139<br />

“We also do not want that one equips these civil rights [in the<br />

Basic Law, GR] with restrictions by general laws, as it is the case in<br />

some constitutional guidelines of the [East German communist]<br />

138<br />

Alexandr Solzhenitsyn, op. cit. (note 131), p. 42.<br />

139<br />

Deutscher Bundestag, Bundesarchiv (ed.), Der Parlamentarische Rat 1948-1949, Oldenbourg,<br />

Munich 1996, pp. 22ff.<br />

116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!