Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

More documents

Recommendations

Info

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY of a mass murder for racist motives committed against Jews in gas chambers with the insecticide “Zyklon B” within the realm of the National Socialist Government. […] Gathering this evidence is capable by itself – but also in connection with the other facts substantiated with evidence in this trial – of letting the conclusion appear compelling that the secret services and other information sources of the western powers engaged in the war against the German Reich could not gather any information about the enemy’s (the German Reich’s) extermination activities against Jews. The most probable explanation for this astonishing fact is that crimes of the mentioned kind, alleged by interested parties only after the surrender of the German Wehrmacht, did not take place. This would cut the ground from under the assumption that the genocide allegedly committed against the Jews by the German Reich (called “Holocaust”) is self-evident. Sylvia Stolz, defense lawyer Annex 21 In the matter of Germar Rudolf I request to hear an expert witness in the field of contemporary history – I suggest Prof. em. Dr. Ernst Nolte. The expert witness will lead the court to the persuasion – guided by the intellectual preparatory work in the Lectures on the Holocaust, which is based on facts – 1. that the Lectures on the Holocaust – Controversial Issues Cross Examined by Germar Rudolf, Theses & Dissertations Press, PO Box 257768, IL 60625, USA, ISBN 1-902619-07-2, 291 has to be rated as a scientific history book of high quality, which fully meets the professional standards of research in contemporary history both by its train of thought and by the way it bases the conclusions arrived at on reliable sources; 2. that, from an expert point of view, this writing reveals a methodically ordered quest for objectively true (correct) insights, which are integrated into a context of reasoning; 3. that the author’s approach is pertinent and systematic; 4. that the author’s implementation of his intentions is based on methodical reflection of the strife for scientific enlightenment; 292 291 The German original of this motion refers to the German version of the book: Vorlesungen über den Holocaust – Strittige Fragen im Kreuzverhör, Castle Hill Publishers, PO Box 118, Hastings, TN34 3ZQ, UK, ISBN 1-902619-07-2. 292 That’s called legalese, I think… 245
GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY 5. that the book proves the official depiction of the mass killings of Jews summarized under the term “Holocaust” to be inconclusive; 6. that the author of the Lectures shows how the official version is full of inconsistencies; 7. that the witness statements upon which the historical Holocaust concept rests have consistently been omitted from critical scrutiny by the proponents of the official version; 8. that official historiography has neglected to elucidate and reflect upon the necessary technical conditions and processes of the claimed mass killings, and to investigate the court testimonies of witnesses as well as the descriptions of experiences by contemporary witnesses with regard to whether and, where applicable, to what extent they are consistent with technical knowledge and insights into natural laws, or else have to be considered as refuted; 9. that the deficiencies of official Holocaust historiography listed here under 6. to 8. prove it to be “unscientific” and “propagandistic”; 10. that the objections of “revisionist” historiography against the official “Holocaust” version appear more than plausible and justify serious doubts about the historical concept protected by art. 130, para. 3, German Penal Code; 11. that the claimed planned and systematically implemented mass murder of Jews for racist motives has at no point in time been sufficiently and competently researched by historians following this creed; 12. that instead and right from the start the thesis of the physical extermination of the Jews residing in the area of influence of the German Reich by the National Socialist government has been prescribed to historical research as a dogma and that attempts by historical researchers to oppose this were punished with massive defamations, destruction of the social existence as well as legal prosecutions and were thus almost entirely suppressed; 13. that a freely evolved consensus in the sense of a voluntarily recognized undisputedness of the official historical concept of the Holocaust cannot be ascertained; 14. that with the appearance of “revisionist” writings […] the official Holocaust version is profoundly challenged in all its essentials aspects, so that the question arises whether the “revisionist” arguments can be refuted by more thorough research activities or whether the official concept of history has to be abandoned, so that 246
Page 2:
GERMAR RUDOLF · RESISTANCE IS OBLI
Page 5 and 6:
Germar Rudolf: Resistance Is Obliga
Page 7 and 8:
GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGA
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 32 and 33:
A. Introduction GERMAR RUDOLF, RESI
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
B. Scientific Considerations I. The
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Arbitrary Selection/Elimination GER
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 144 and 145:
D. Specific Considerations I. Gener
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
3. Passion GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANC
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
7. The Hoax of the Twentieth Centur
Page 176:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196: GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGA
Page 210 and 211: F. Conclusion GERMAR RUDOLF, RESIST
Page 220 and 221: G. Path of Most Resistance GERMAR R
Page 224 and 225: H. Appendices GERMAR RUDOLF, RESIST
Page 240 and 241: Annex 13 GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Appendix 6: Book Burning GERMAR RUD
Page 340 and 341:
Appendix 7: The Verdict I. General
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Attorneys L. Bock, Liebfrauenstr. 1
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Dissecting the Holocaust. The Growi
Page 372 and 373:
Chelmno: A German Camp in History &
Page 374 and 375:
Special Treatment inAuschwitz: Orig
Page 376 and 377:
Auschwitz Lies: Legends, Lies and P
show all

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?