Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
that “the primitive” could under circumstances be “more efficient than
the modern,” while giving as an example the allegedly primitive, yet
superior Soviet battle tank T34. It may be doubted that the expert witness
is in a position to define the terms “primitive” and “efficient” in a
technical sense, let alone substantiate his claim, even if he wanted to.
The excusable and understandable incompetence of the expert witness
on technical questions is also apparent from his Addendum of 5 Feb.
2006, where he mentions an allegedly newly discovered document on
the claimed capacity of the crematoria in Auschwitz (Addendum, p. 2).
But the capacity of crematories does specifically not result from documents
– and also not from arbitrary factors of French pharmacists, as
the expert witness suggests (Pressac’s “division by four,” ibid.) – but
from technical and thermodynamic calculations or experiments. This
passage proves furthermore the expert witness’s lack of expertise about
matters of content, because he obviously does not know the possibly
most important source critical work on the issue of the authenticity of
the document in question about the capacity of the crematoria in
Auschwitz. 296 The document in question has moreover not been “recently
discovered” but has been known since the 1950s. 297 The expert witness
seems to be just as unaware that, contrary to his claim (Addendum,
p. 2), the cremation capacity then planned for Auschwitz was by no
means higher than that of other camps in the “Reich proper,” if correlating
it to the planned camp strength or to the mortality rate. 298
Regarding the question whether the demographic investigations of
third persons (Benz, Sanning) 299 set out from “premises worthy of critique”
or reach “methodically […] questionable results” (p. 28), it is not
evident either why the expert witness should be more competent than
the investigating Court.
On pages 36f. the expert witness far exceeds his area of competence
when demanding that everyone has to feel “shame,” “agony,” “dejection”
and “despondence” while reading certain documents or books. It
296
See Carlo Mattogno, “‘Schlüsseldokument’ – eine alternative Interpretation,” Vierteljahreshefte
für freie Geschichtsforschung, 4(1) (2000), pp. 51-56.
297
See Komitee der antifaschistischen Widerstandskämpfer der DDR (ed.), SS im Einsatz, Kongress-Verlag,
Berlin 1957, p. 269.
298
See Carlo Mattogno’s response to John C. Zimmerman: “An Accountant Poses as Cremation
Expert,” in C. Mattogno, G. Rudolf, Auschwitz-Lies, Theses & Dissertations Press, Chicago
2005, pp. 87-194; this contribution appeared for the first time on the Internet in 2000; see
www.vho.org/GB/c/CM/Risposta-new-eng.html.
299
Wolfgang Benz (ed.), Dimension des Völkermords, Oldenbourg, Munich 1991. Walter N. Sanning,
Die Auflösung des osteuropäischen Judentums, Grabert, Tübingen 1983.
295