08.03.2013 Views

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY<br />

seeched me to leave the fingers off it, for heaven’s sake. Age-related<br />

we all turn into cowards.” The witness will confirm to have written<br />

these passages.<br />

2. The witness will confirm that, in case he testifies on the Holocaust to<br />

the best of his knowledge and belief, he fears to be exposed to societal<br />

persecution and legal prosecution, which is why he refrains to<br />

testify in the first place.<br />

3. The witness will confirm that this fear of persecution is due to the<br />

fact that, if testifying to the best of his knowledge and belief, he<br />

would have to make statements which run contrary to the prosecution<br />

of the defendant [<strong>Rudolf</strong>].<br />

4. The witness will confirm that it is the permanent threat of historians<br />

with societal persecution and legal prosecution which keeps them<br />

from taking revisionist publications seriously in public or to even assume<br />

revisionist positions, but not subject-specific reservations.<br />

5. The witness will confirm that the unanimity of established historians<br />

on many issues of the Third Reich exists only, because dissidents are<br />

being persecuted and prosecuted or are threatened with it.<br />

<strong>Germar</strong> <strong>Rudolf</strong><br />

Annex 16<br />

In the matter of <strong>Germar</strong> <strong>Rudolf</strong> I request to introduce and read during<br />

the main proceedings the expert report by historian Dr. Joachim<br />

Hoffmann, to be taken from the case file of the penal trial against Wigbert<br />

Grabert, Tübingen County Court, ref. 4 Gs 173/95, as evidence for<br />

the following facts:<br />

1. The report was recognized as an expert report by the above mentioned<br />

court, and it was introduced into the trial as such.<br />

2. The expert report concluded that the book by Ernst Gauss [=<strong>Germar</strong><br />

<strong>Rudolf</strong>], “Grundlagen zur Zeitgeschichte” meets the criteria of scientific<br />

works in the field of contemporary history and should therefore<br />

enjoy the protection of art. 5, para. 3, German Basic Law.<br />

<strong>Germar</strong> <strong>Rudolf</strong><br />

Annex 17<br />

In the matter of <strong>Germar</strong> <strong>Rudolf</strong> I request to hear the expert historian<br />

Prof. Dr. h.c. Emil Schlee, to be summoned via his private address, as a<br />

witness for the following probative allegations:<br />

241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!