Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
“example of lack of seriousness.” However, the reference to secondary
literature of source criticism actually proves the seriousness of
Graf’s critique, because this corrects a flaw of Hilberg’s work. One
cannot blame the revisionists for the fact that only revisionist
sources publish source criticism deserving that name, rendering it
impossible to quote works of established source criticism.
The BPjM, by the way, uses the German term “Leugnung” in its decision,
meaning denying against better knowledge, which implies
that the author is a liar. This is a personal attack on the revisionist
author proving a bias.
The BPjM’s claim that “Graf declares as obsolete the major part of
Hilberg’s investigations” is simply wrong. Graf does not declare the
investigations as obsolete, but their critique, as these investigations
are basically undisputed and moreover miss the topic of physical destruction.
Just as incorrect is the BPjM’s allegation that Graf tries “to disqualify
Hilberg’s insights by simply contesting them and making counterclaims.”
Graf’s contesting is not simple, yet based on reasons and
arguments. In contrast to this, Hilberg’s claims of a systematic destruction
of Jews is based on simple, unproven claims – by alleged
witnesses – which Hilberg completely fails to scrutinize.
c) In summary one has to conclude that the authors of this indexing
decision evidently do not have the faintest clue about the methods of
historiography, about the body of source material, and about source
criticism.
4. Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Research
The German revisionist periodical Vierteljahreshefte für freie Geschichtsforschung
is not even mentioned in the indictment, although two
indexing decisions are included in the investigation files regarding the
issues 1 and 2 of 1997. 188 Because two statements in these decisions
shed a revealing light on the BPjM, I may address them here briefly
anyway. Regarding issue no. 1/1997 of my journal, one of the reasons
given for indexing it is my accusation leveled against the federal German
government agencies that censorship exists in Germany, which
188 Decision no. 5264, 5265, 6 Feb. 1998, BAnz 41, 28 Feb. 1998; cf. www.vho.org/VffG; Engl.
similar: The Revisionist (www.vho.org/tr).
169