Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
sequently cremated without leaving traces, then one must accept the
consequence that it is being investigated whether such an egregious
process was technically possible. To my knowledge there exists in the
established literature no parallel to the amount of work put into this
study; according to my judgment, an objection that could perhaps be
raised against this extraordinary reduction of the actual victim number
is the fact that under exceptional circumstance it is exactly the primitive
which can be more efficient than the modern and that which is taken for
granted in nowadays’ crematories – similar to the Soviet battle tank T
34, which has been superior in its primitivity to the German tanks for
some time.
The contribution by Friedrich Paul Berg on the diesel gas chambers
challenges the prevailing view less than the study by Mattogno and
Deana, and at the end the author tendentially retracts his main thesis.
This essay nevertheless has to also be added to those challenges which
force the established position to turn its attention more to that which so
far has been considered unproblematic.
The statements by Arnulf Neumaier on the “Treblinka Holocaust”
have an anti-Semitic tone to them, for instance when he talks about the
continuity of “oaths of vengeance and instinctive hatred of the Old Testament.”
However, references to national {p. 25} or religious traditions
are not impermissible in and of themselves, and with a different point of
reference they can frequently be found in the established literature as
well. It has to be considered as unseemly and a violation of scientific
maxims, though, when Neumaier illustrates his (presumably justified)
polemics against the notion of the combustibility of corpses without
fuel with a reproduction of the story of “little Pauline” from [the German
fairy tale book] Struwwelpeter. Yet his objections against the possibility
of many hundreds of thousands of corpses disappearing tracelessly
cannot be withheld from a discussion. The reference to the extraordinary
achievements of which prehistoric research is capable when
detecting prehistoric fire places with the help of the natural sciences’
methods, can just as little be shrugged off with the wave of a hand.
The essay by Herbert Tiedemann about Babi Yar is a denial which at
first glance was downright unfathomable to me. As far as I know, not
even Robert Faurisson has denied the correctness of the reports by the
Einsatzgruppen; hence the suspiciousness against documentary evidence
has been brought to an extreme here. The juxtaposition of contemporary
reports and witness statements is no compelling proof despite
276