Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
“The most harmful aspect of what science has become is the deliberate
attempt to hide evidence that contradicts the current paradigm.
[…] In a quite human fashion, however, they [the peers] act in
an exactly opposite manner – judging that ‘if an observation disagrees
with what we know to be correct, then it must be wrong.’ The
tradition of ‘peer review’ of articles published in professional journals
has degenerated into almost total censorship.”
Which brings us to the second tactic of the immunization of theories:
2. Arbitrary selection or elimination of data
Data sets are information which we have gained through research of
an object and which serves either to form a new theory or to test an existing
theory.
If a set of data is reproducible and/or verifiable and can be confirmed,
it must not be eliminated.
If such data is nevertheless eliminated in order to immunize an existing
theory, then this elimination is unscientific.
The fact that established historians are ignoring and physically eliminating
(specifically by additional censorship and book-burning) extensive
results of revisionist research is in itself evidence of their dogmatism,
which ignores data in order to immunize its own thesis. But I will
ignore that here for a moment.
The Holocaust thesis – meaning the industrial extermination of Jews
– relies almost exclusively on witness statements as evidence. Exemplary
for this is the verdict of the Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial: 101
“For the court lacked almost all possibilities of discovery available
in a normal murder trial to create a true picture of the actual
event at the time of the murder. It lacked the bodies of the victims,
autopsy records, reports by expert witnesses on the cause of death
and the hour of death; it lacked traces of the perpetrators, murder
weapons, etc. A verification of the witness testimony was possible
only in rare cases.”
It is already most unusual to conduct a trial for alleged mass murder
in which all the prerequisites are lacking that would be necessary to
open a normal murder trial. However, when examining the 77 files of
investigatory proceedings of the Auschwitz Trial as well as the trial it-
101 I. Sagel-Grande et al. (eds.), Justiz und NS-Verbrechen, Vol. XXI, University Press, Amsterdam
1979, p. 434; verdict of the Frankfurt Auschwitz trial, ref. 50/4 Ks 2/63. p. 108.
77