08.03.2013 Views

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY<br />

Moreover, his decision to leave Auschwitz with the Nazis rather<br />

than be liberated by the Russians suggests that he considered the Nazis<br />

to be preferable, hardly an attitude for a prisoner in a death camp. In<br />

Night he claims the Russians liberated Auschwitz two days after he was<br />

evacuated to Buchenwald; 8 in All Rivers Run to the Sea he says it was<br />

nine days later. 9 The difference matters little for a novel, but Wiesel has<br />

sworn under oath that what he said in Night is historical truth. “It is a<br />

true account. Every word in it is true.” 10<br />

Wiesel told Francois Mauriac (and Mauriac’s account is related in<br />

the preface to Night) that he “had seen his mother, a beloved little sister,<br />

and most of his family, except his father and two other sisters, disappear<br />

in a furnace fueled by living creatures.” 11 Later he admits that he did not<br />

know how or when his mother and sister perished. Certainly there were<br />

no furnaces at Auschwitz fueled by living creatures; there and at every<br />

other prison camp run by the Third Reich crematoria were fueled by<br />

coal gas.<br />

It is also ironic that the Wieselian narrative makes little mention of<br />

the most diabolical execution machine attributed to the Third Reich,<br />

namely homicidal gas chambers. In Night he first uses the word<br />

“gassed” on page 68 and then not again. He describes beating, shooting,<br />

hanging, flaming pits, exhaustion, forced labor, cold, and starvation, but<br />

no gas chambers – not even rumors. Why? <strong>Is</strong> this omission another<br />

simple oversight or could the revisionists’ third contention indeed have<br />

validity?<br />

In the preface to the new translation of Night Wiesel claims, “Ilse<br />

Koch, the notorious sadistic monster of Buchenwald, was allowed to<br />

have children and live happily ever after.” Yet the truth is that Koch<br />

was sentenced to life in prison where she hung herself in 1967. Why<br />

does Elie repeat such an easily refuted lie? Why does his publisher refuse<br />

to correct it, saying only that Night is our most profitable book?<br />

Why is Wiesel’s narrative “self-evident” when it is so easily proved to<br />

be false?<br />

Wiesel claims infants were thrown alive into fiery ditches, although<br />

the Yad Vashem-trained guides at the Auschwitz Memorial say no such<br />

8 Ibid., p. 82<br />

9 All Rivers…, p. 91.<br />

10 Carlo Mattogno, “Elie Wiesel: New Documents,” March 26, 2010,<br />

www.revblog.codoh.com/2010/03/elie-wiesel-new-documents/<br />

11 Night, p. xviii.<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!