Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
acquittal (for this fear the term Orletitis has been coined). On the
other hand judges and prosecutors are so brainwashed by the prevailing
paranoid hysteria due to the all-permeating propaganda that they
are psychologically incapable of judging objectively. Medical science
has coined a term for this mental state as well: “Holocaust Hysteria
Syndrome.”
8. Finally and ultimately we need reconciliation with ourselves in
Germany, a general amnesty, and we need to leave for fresh fields,
but most certainly not yet another turn in the vicious circle of violence
and counter-violence, persecution and counter-persecution.
As the final point of the section I want to discuss the issue of punishment,
that is, of the use of force by the state, which is a kind of violence.
If a judge were to ask me prior to my release: “Herr Rudolf, when
we release you now, do you intend to abide by the law in the future?,”
then I would answer: Yes, sure, because I have done nothing else during
the past ten years. During all these years I have always abided by the
laws of the countries I lived in. Because all this for which I am now indicted
here I have done in England and in the USA, and it has been perfectly
legal there. And when I am released, I will go back to my wife
and my daughter in the U.S., if God permits. Or I should say if the U.S.
government lets me. That is, after all, not the same thing. And it goes
without saying that I will then – as I have in the past – abide by U.S.
law. Or do you seriously mean that in the U.S. I am also to abide by
German laws? And if also by German laws, why not also by Chinese,
North Korean, Cuban and Iranian laws? With which justification do you
believe you can demand the enforcement of the German legal order all
over the world?
As you certainly know better than I do, there are several theories in
jurisprudence justifying the punishment of offenders, some of which I
may discuss here with regard to my case:
1. Individual deterrence: The attempt to discourage me from future acts
of civil disobedience backfires, since I resist exactly because of this
unjust persecution of dissidents. Hence more unjust persecution will
lead only to more resistance in my case. If my father did not manage
to break my will with brutal violence when I was two to three years
old, do you really think the state with its methods will be more successful?
I am gladly prepared to be convinced by good arguments,
but not by violence!
205