Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
been propagated for decades. Materialism (“wealth”), hedonism (“pleasure”),
and emancipation from social bonds are “values” which are being
pursued. The statistical numbers of single households, divorces, and
lack of children clearly indicate that nowadays young people are hardly
capable of forming lasting social bonds; that love and loyalty, responsibility
and altruism, that is: the will to make sacrifices for others, foremost
and first of all for one’s own family, but also for kin, community,
people, fatherland, and one’s own culture hardly exists. Among them,
the love for children is the purest, deepest, most selfless and intensive
form of love or even form of emotion of our entire emotional world.
The rejection of children therefore proves the inaptitude of an entire
generation to love. The striking lack of these features, which lets this
society collapse to such a degree that, if this development continues
steadily for another 100 years, there will be basically no German people
left, proves unshakably that these new generations are no longer socially
competent. And to go even further: the behavior of this generation is
ultimately destroying their society. I think that there can hardly be a
more socially incompetent behavior than the one leading to the extinction
of a society itself. The question arises: What are the causes of this
dramatic change of behavior? We revisionists at least cannot be blamed
for this.
If one is politically so inclined, one could give an answer to this
question as follows: It is obvious that a change of behavior affecting
people from all walks of life at once can be caused only by corresponding
depictions in the mass media. The primary cause would then be the
propagation of hedonism, materialism, and egoistic self-realization as
well as the disparagement of traditional family values, among them father-
and motherhood, animosity toward children, and abasement of
self-sacrificial engagement for a family and for the society at large. The
way the German law for the protection of the youth is currently written,
such a way of arguing would permit the indexing of a major part of the
German mass media, provided one has the political will.
Please don’t misunderstand me. I am not in favor of such measures
at all, as I am opposed to censorship in general, but this example shows,
what kind of arbitrary misuse your laws permit. As undefined as this
section of the law is, it is not only unlawful in my eyes but potentially
very dangerous.
When revisionist media are indexed, the claim that they endanger
the social competence of adolescents is never substantiated. It is
131