08.03.2013 Views

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY<br />

factually seen, not the most suitable symbol for the much more comprehensive<br />

events of the National Socialist attempts of a “final solution of<br />

the Jewish question” in Europe. Instead of “Holocaust” or “Auschwitz”<br />

I therefore use here the term “final solution” as an acronym. All of the<br />

so-called Holocaust deniers are radical revisionists with regard to the<br />

“prevailing opinion” of the established or “orthodox” historians, who<br />

consider the million-fold mass killings with poison gas in Auschwitz,<br />

Treblinka and other extermination camps as a self-evident and hence<br />

indisputable fact. I speak {p. 2} abbreviatingly of “revisionists” on the<br />

one hand and of “established” or “orthodox” on the other.<br />

I have expressed myself frequently about this topic during the past<br />

three decades, although always by way of interpretation, since I have<br />

never been an “expert” on questions about the final solution, but merely<br />

had and have a passable knowledge of the literature. Such statements<br />

are simply inevitable when writing a book with the title Der Faschismus<br />

in seiner Epoche (1963) [Fascism in its epoch; Engl. title: Three faces<br />

of fascism, 1965]. In hindsight I have to say that from today’s point of<br />

view my knowledge was small and was mainly restricted to the volumes<br />

of the documentation about the Nuremberg trial against the main war<br />

criminals and in addition to the notes by <strong>Rudolf</strong> Höss and Kurt Gerstein<br />

as well as to the books by Reitlinger and Hilberg. I did not encounter<br />

any doubts which had to be taken seriously, but this attitude, which may<br />

be called “uncritical,” was not different to that of the defense lawyers<br />

during the Auschwitz trial. Hence there was no discernible cause that I<br />

as a historian of ideologies, which I am, could not reach to conclusions<br />

like the one that Auschwitz is as certainly intrinsic to the principles of<br />

National Socialist race teachings as is the fruit intrinsic to the seed. 2<br />

About the specific events I did not say much more than the following:<br />

“And since early 1942 the extermination is being planned on a big<br />

scale, but at once compartmentalized and industrialized. The alleged<br />

Jewish commissars in Moscow and the alleged Jewish bankers in New<br />

York, which are waging the war, are unreachable; hence their alleged<br />

biological basis has to be stricken, and in infinite {p. 3} columns of<br />

trains the impoverished Jewish proletariat is rolling, and the remainders<br />

of European Jewry is rolling into the gigantic workshops of fast and<br />

hygienic annihilation.” But my thorough analysis of Hitler’s “world<br />

view” boils down to the fact that this process, kept as such a secret, the<br />

final solution with a meaning no longer merely “territorial,” nevertheless<br />

corresponded to the central intention of National Socialism, 3 and I<br />

263

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!