Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
yet others are plausible, without giving comprehensible reasons, is
simply shady.
Next the Public Prosecution of Bochum states that, within the framework
of article 130 German Penal Code, “the criterion of ‘trivialization’”
requires
“that it derives from the overall consideration of the pertinent
statement that the nature and extent of the genocidal acts perpetrated
by the National Socialist regime against the Jewish people are
subject to a different historical assessment, for instance by representing
them as ‘police measures’ or as ‘inevitable acts of war’ (cf.
Tröndle/Fischer, comments on German Penal Code, 50th ed., article
130, no. 24). This cannot be ascertained regarding the essay ‘The
Number of Victims of Auschwitz.’”
But this cannot be ascertained for any of the writing I have authored
or published either.
The Public Prosecution of Bochum finally asserted that Meyer had
stated himself “at the end of the text that his result does not relativize
the barbarity, yet verifies it.” In the quotes from my book Lectures referred
to in chapter D.III.3. above, which the Public Prosecution of
Mannheim has ignored, I have stated the following, which I have condensed
here:
a) The persecutorial fate of the Jews and its illegal nature have to be
and are recognized.
b) This persecution was bad and barbaric.
c) Already such measures of persecution not leading to death were unacceptable,
and each victim is one too many.
d) We owe compassion and respect to the victims.
e) National Socialism is under any circumstances at least partially
guilty for the fate of those incarcerated innocently, even if those in
custody died due to “acts of God.” 180
f) The mere deportation into camps with horrific hygienic and organizational
conditions resulting in the death of tens of thousands
Revisionism,” The Revisionist 2 (2), (2004), pp. 131-139; Gottfried Zarnow, “Kritik an Fritjof
Meyer durch einen Universitätslehrer,” Vierteljahreshefte für freie Geschichtsforschung 8 (4)
(2004) pp. 443f.
180 Using the term “partially guilty” in my defense speech didn’t go down well with the public
prosecutor, because this allegedly constitutes trivialization. This was one of the reasons for the
confiscation of my defense speech; see Appendix 9, p. 363. According to this one has to hold
National Socialism 100% responsible for everything, if one does not want to be liable for prosecution
in Germany.
163