Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
Appendix 3: Assessments by Expert Historians
1. Dr. Olaf Rose
The following expert report by historian Dr. Olaf Rose was prepared
on request of Germar Rudolf for this trial. Since the 2nd Superior Penal
Chamber of the Mannheim District Court dealing with this case had
indicated that it will sentence the defendant Rudolf to five years imprisonment,
should further motions to introduce evidence be filed in the
defense of Rudolf, whereas the instant cessation of any defense activity
would lead to a sentence of “only” 2½ years, this expert report was not
introduced to exonerate the defendant. Considering the Chamber’s attitude
of total refusal to accept any motions to introduce evidence, it had
to be expected that this specialist expert report would have been rejected
as well, because the Chamber claimed to have had sufficient expertise
to assess the scientific nature of the analyzed books.
256
Expert Report
on the fulfillment of formal criteria of scientific works by the
writings on the persecution of Jews in the Third Reich authored or
edited by Dipl. Chem. Germar Rudolf
The author was asked by the public defense lawyer Ludwig Bock of
the defendant Germar Rudolf, tried in front of the 6th [correct: 2nd]
Penal Chamber of the Mannheim District Court on suspicion of incitement
of the masses, to give his view as an expert witness about the probative
claim whether the following writings authored by the defendant
meet the formal requirements of proper scientific works in the field of
scientific historiography:
1. Ernst Gauss (ed.) (= Germar Rudolf): Grundlagen zur Zeitgeschichte,
Grabert, Tübingen 1994 (quoted as Grundlagen) [125]
2. Germar Rudolf: Das Rudolf-Gutachten, Castle Hill Publishers,
Hastings 2 2001 [49]
3. Germar Rudolf: Vorlesungen über den Holocaust, Castle Hill
Publishers 2005 (quoted as Vorlesungen). [55]
After receiving and preliminarily reviewing the three volumes, I
asked to be allowed to limit myself to the evaluation of the first and
third book, as I am not able to assess the entire content of the so-called