08.03.2013 Views

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY<br />

thing ever took place. He bolsters his contention saying “Historians,<br />

among them Telford Taylor, confirmed it.” The truth is that Telford<br />

Taylor was not a historian but rather a lead prosecutor at Nuremberg,<br />

and nowhere did he write or confirm that people, let alone infants, were<br />

thrown alive into fires.<br />

Yet Wiesel persists in telling this lie. In 1985 before the Senate Foreign<br />

Relations Committee he said under oath: 12<br />

“Mr. Chairman, I have seen the flames. I have seen the flames<br />

rising to nocturnal heavens; I have seen parents and children,<br />

teachers and their disciples, dreamers and their dreams, and woe<br />

unto me, I have seen children thrown alive in the flames.”<br />

While we can forgive the melodramatic presentation, the fact remains<br />

that there is no forensic evidence whatsoever that people were<br />

mass murdered at Auschwitz by being thrown into fires. Yet again this<br />

untruth goes unchallenged and Wiesel continues to be admired as an<br />

“honorable witness” and a “nationally approved moral luminary.” 13<br />

There is a famous photograph taken in Buchenwald in adult Block<br />

56 by a professional American photographer Harry Miller of the Signal<br />

Corps. When it appeared in the New York Times on May 6, 1945, none<br />

of the former prisoners were identified. Years later in 1983 Wiesel<br />

claimed to be shown in the photo, and he is now so identified in Holocaust<br />

museums all over the world. 14<br />

Not only does the image not appear to be a boy of 16, but if his story<br />

in Night is true, he could not possibly have been in the photo. Buchenwald<br />

was liberated by the Americans on April 11, 1945; Wiesel claims<br />

to have become very ill three days later with food poisoning and claims<br />

to have been “transferred to a hospital” where he “spent two weeks between<br />

life and death.” 15 The photograph was taken on April 16th in<br />

adult Block 56, not children’s Block 66 where Elie was sheltered after<br />

the death of his father in January. 16 Yet Wiesel claims, “The truth I present<br />

is unvarnished.”<br />

12<br />

Mark Chmiel. Elie Wiesel and the Politics of Moral Leadership (Philadelphia: Temple University<br />

Press, 2001), pp. 127f. as taken from Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 99th Congress,<br />

1st sess., Congressional Record (7 March 1985), S2857.<br />

13<br />

Ibid., p. 136.<br />

14<br />

Samuel G. Freedman, “Bearing Witness: The life and Work of Elie Wiesel,” New York Times,<br />

23 October 1983.<br />

15<br />

Night, p. 115.<br />

16<br />

www.buchenwald.de/english/index.php?p=168<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!