Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
me ambiguously that we would make it out with me “outside,” which
was probably a threat that he intended to beat me up.
Well, I have never gotten involved in a fistfight in my entire adult
life, probably for the simple reason that nobody seems to have dared to
attack an athletic man of 6’5.” If I was accosted by someone in the past,
then this happened always while I sat or squatted. In these cases it always
proved enough to just stand up in order to swiftly resolve the situation
peacefully. And so it was in this case, for I am with distance the
tallest inmate in this prison. When I got up during morning break, the
German-Russian had apparently forgotten that he had wanted to have it
out with me.
Yet the media do not just lie by themselves, but they are also slavishly
at service when it comes to uncritically spreading the lies of others,
especially when it is about historical dissidents. For this your press
release may serve as an example, Mr. Prosecutor, which you sent to
news agencies on 18 April 2006 on occasion of your filing your indictment.
This press release was then passed on by the German news agency
dpa in a slightly edited version to all media outlets, which published
them duly. 248 I may direct your attention to the following sentence in
your press release:
“The ‘revisionists’ Germar Rudolf and Siegfried Verbeke are accused
of have systematically denied and trivialized the genocide
committed by National Socialism against the Jews by means of the
Internet and of the dissemination of literature, as well as of having
incited to hatred against the Jewish population with anti-Semitic agitation.”
As a reaction to this, dpa issued these lines, among others:
“According to the investigators they also are said to have incited
to hatred against Jews with anti-Semitic agitation.”
“With anti-Semitic agitation” – that sounds pretty gory. Well, I have
read the indictment several times, but nowhere have I found the words
“anti-Semitic” or “anti-Semitism” or anything similar. Maybe you
simply forgot to use this term, but it is a fact that it is not in there. The
following question arises then, though: How was it that you, right after
the indictment’s ink had dried, were able to sit down and claim such
untruths about the very indictment you yourself had just written, and
disseminate them into the world?
248 E.g. in the German daily Stuttgarter Zeitung, 19 April 2006, p. 8.
201