08.06.2013 Views

Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library

Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library

Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Rethinking</strong> <strong>the</strong> selfare state 186<br />

conservatives concerned over increases in government expenditures, but this opposition<br />

may well not be decisive if <strong>the</strong> programs are, in <strong>the</strong> long run, largely financially selfsustaining,<br />

and to <strong>the</strong> extent that <strong>the</strong>y are not, entail some reallocation of <strong>the</strong> already<br />

substantial level of government subsidies to post-secondary education and research to<br />

such a program.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Vouchers, as we argued above, are not a novel public policy instrument in <strong>the</strong> postsecondary<br />

education context. For decades, governments in industrialized democracies<br />

have funded public universities on <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong>ir enrollment levels, but have only<br />

accorded limited scope <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>se institutions to rely on student tuition to support program<br />

quality. <strong>The</strong> voucher proposal that we canvassed in this chapter is meant to protect, and,<br />

indeed, promote, access to universities by students from financially disadvantaged<br />

families while simultaneously improving program quality. It does so by creating an<br />

explicit demand-side voucher that would consist of two components: means-tested grants<br />

<strong>for</strong> students from financially disadvantaged families and income-contingent loans <strong>for</strong><br />

tuition and related expenses <strong>for</strong> all students. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, to promote institutional innovation,<br />

differentiation, and quality we argue that institutions receiving <strong>the</strong>se vouchers ought to<br />

enjoy increased flexibility in relation to tuition pricing, and that barriers to entry by new<br />

institutions be relaxed (subject to an appropriate ex ante certification regime and ex post<br />

requirements <strong>for</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation dissemination). In tandem, we believe that <strong>the</strong>se re<strong>for</strong>ms are<br />

likely to create a far more dynamic university system, while steadfastly protecting<br />

accessibility goals.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!