08.06.2013 Views

Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library

Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library

Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Food stamps 45<br />

A policy history of <strong>the</strong> food stamp program 21<br />

<strong>The</strong> two-stamp system: 1939–43<br />

As discussed earlier, despite its current explicit mandate of enriching <strong>the</strong> diets of poor<br />

Americans, <strong>the</strong> FSP actually originated as an ef<strong>for</strong>t to aid two very different but needy<br />

groups: unemployed city-dwellers and farmers with unsold surpluses. <strong>The</strong> first FSP,<br />

inaugurated in 1939 by Secretary of Agriculture Henry Wallace, allowed eligible persons<br />

to buy orange stamps equal to <strong>the</strong>ir normal food expenditures. Along with each dollar<br />

coupon, <strong>the</strong>y would also receive 50 cents worth of blue stamps. Orange stamps could be<br />

redeemed to buy any food product; however, blue stamps were restricted to <strong>the</strong> purchase<br />

of food which <strong>the</strong> USDA had listed as surplus. <strong>The</strong> goal was to help <strong>the</strong> hungry (typically<br />

unemployed urbanites) by providing <strong>the</strong>m with extra food income, while also relieving<br />

farmers of <strong>the</strong>ir surplus produce. A quote from Milo Perkins, <strong>the</strong> Program’s first<br />

Administrator, is illustrative of <strong>the</strong> FSP’s original intentions: “We got a picture of a<br />

gorge, with farm surpluses on one cliff, and under-nourished city folks with outstretched<br />

hands on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. We set out to find a practical way to build a bridge across that<br />

chasm.” 22 <strong>The</strong> first FSP wound up in 1943, once it was decided that <strong>the</strong> conditions that<br />

created <strong>the</strong> need <strong>for</strong> it—unmarketable food surpluses and widespread unemployment—<br />

had ceased to exist.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second FSP and <strong>the</strong> Food Stamp Act: 1961–80<br />

<strong>The</strong> next 18 years saw considerable legislative interest in <strong>the</strong> FSP, and <strong>the</strong> second pilot<br />

FSP was initiated in 1961. While it eliminated <strong>the</strong> requirement of purchasing special<br />

stamps <strong>for</strong> surplus food, <strong>the</strong> indirect subsidization of farms remained an important part of<br />

<strong>the</strong> program’s mandate, as evidenced by its declared emphasis on increasing <strong>the</strong><br />

consumption of perishables.<br />

<strong>The</strong> new FSP allowed consumers to purchase food stamps and receive a subsidy in <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong>m of an additional amount of free stamps sufficient to “shore up” <strong>the</strong> household’s<br />

dietary needs. Participation in <strong>the</strong> FSP grew from half a million in 1965 to over 15<br />

million persons in 1974. 23 In <strong>the</strong> early 1970s, major concerns arose over <strong>the</strong> cost of <strong>the</strong><br />

FSP, which had grown to $1.75 billion by 1971. 24 As <strong>the</strong> USDA’s own “Short History”<br />

document observes, “it was during this time that <strong>the</strong> issue was framed that would<br />

dominate food stamp legislation ever after: how to balance program access with program<br />

accountability?” 25 Republicans and Democrats both championed <strong>the</strong> FSP, but advocated<br />

very different policy objectives. <strong>The</strong> Republican initiatives emphasized tighter controls<br />

and <strong>the</strong> targeting of benefits to <strong>the</strong> very neediest members of society, while Democratic<br />

proposals focused on streamlining <strong>the</strong> approval process and reducing errors. <strong>The</strong> 1977<br />

Food Stamp Act attempted to meet both sets of priorities. Among o<strong>the</strong>r changes, it<br />

established <strong>the</strong> poverty line as <strong>the</strong> standard <strong>for</strong> FSP eligibility, undertook to penalize<br />

households whose heads voluntarily quit jobs, and required regional authorities to<br />

actively encourage participation in <strong>the</strong> FSP by eligible parties (“outreach” policies).<br />

Perhaps <strong>the</strong> most signiflcant feature of <strong>the</strong> 1977 Food Stamp Act, however, was that it

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!