Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library
Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library
Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Food stamps 45<br />
A policy history of <strong>the</strong> food stamp program 21<br />
<strong>The</strong> two-stamp system: 1939–43<br />
As discussed earlier, despite its current explicit mandate of enriching <strong>the</strong> diets of poor<br />
Americans, <strong>the</strong> FSP actually originated as an ef<strong>for</strong>t to aid two very different but needy<br />
groups: unemployed city-dwellers and farmers with unsold surpluses. <strong>The</strong> first FSP,<br />
inaugurated in 1939 by Secretary of Agriculture Henry Wallace, allowed eligible persons<br />
to buy orange stamps equal to <strong>the</strong>ir normal food expenditures. Along with each dollar<br />
coupon, <strong>the</strong>y would also receive 50 cents worth of blue stamps. Orange stamps could be<br />
redeemed to buy any food product; however, blue stamps were restricted to <strong>the</strong> purchase<br />
of food which <strong>the</strong> USDA had listed as surplus. <strong>The</strong> goal was to help <strong>the</strong> hungry (typically<br />
unemployed urbanites) by providing <strong>the</strong>m with extra food income, while also relieving<br />
farmers of <strong>the</strong>ir surplus produce. A quote from Milo Perkins, <strong>the</strong> Program’s first<br />
Administrator, is illustrative of <strong>the</strong> FSP’s original intentions: “We got a picture of a<br />
gorge, with farm surpluses on one cliff, and under-nourished city folks with outstretched<br />
hands on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. We set out to find a practical way to build a bridge across that<br />
chasm.” 22 <strong>The</strong> first FSP wound up in 1943, once it was decided that <strong>the</strong> conditions that<br />
created <strong>the</strong> need <strong>for</strong> it—unmarketable food surpluses and widespread unemployment—<br />
had ceased to exist.<br />
<strong>The</strong> second FSP and <strong>the</strong> Food Stamp Act: 1961–80<br />
<strong>The</strong> next 18 years saw considerable legislative interest in <strong>the</strong> FSP, and <strong>the</strong> second pilot<br />
FSP was initiated in 1961. While it eliminated <strong>the</strong> requirement of purchasing special<br />
stamps <strong>for</strong> surplus food, <strong>the</strong> indirect subsidization of farms remained an important part of<br />
<strong>the</strong> program’s mandate, as evidenced by its declared emphasis on increasing <strong>the</strong><br />
consumption of perishables.<br />
<strong>The</strong> new FSP allowed consumers to purchase food stamps and receive a subsidy in <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>for</strong>m of an additional amount of free stamps sufficient to “shore up” <strong>the</strong> household’s<br />
dietary needs. Participation in <strong>the</strong> FSP grew from half a million in 1965 to over 15<br />
million persons in 1974. 23 In <strong>the</strong> early 1970s, major concerns arose over <strong>the</strong> cost of <strong>the</strong><br />
FSP, which had grown to $1.75 billion by 1971. 24 As <strong>the</strong> USDA’s own “Short History”<br />
document observes, “it was during this time that <strong>the</strong> issue was framed that would<br />
dominate food stamp legislation ever after: how to balance program access with program<br />
accountability?” 25 Republicans and Democrats both championed <strong>the</strong> FSP, but advocated<br />
very different policy objectives. <strong>The</strong> Republican initiatives emphasized tighter controls<br />
and <strong>the</strong> targeting of benefits to <strong>the</strong> very neediest members of society, while Democratic<br />
proposals focused on streamlining <strong>the</strong> approval process and reducing errors. <strong>The</strong> 1977<br />
Food Stamp Act attempted to meet both sets of priorities. Among o<strong>the</strong>r changes, it<br />
established <strong>the</strong> poverty line as <strong>the</strong> standard <strong>for</strong> FSP eligibility, undertook to penalize<br />
households whose heads voluntarily quit jobs, and required regional authorities to<br />
actively encourage participation in <strong>the</strong> FSP by eligible parties (“outreach” policies).<br />
Perhaps <strong>the</strong> most signiflcant feature of <strong>the</strong> 1977 Food Stamp Act, however, was that it