08.06.2013 Views

Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library

Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library

Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Notes 227<br />

85; see also Harvey Rosen, Public Finance (Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, 1985), pp.<br />

60–3; and Barr, pp. 80–3.<br />

33 Stiglitz, p. 205; however, <strong>for</strong> a more qualified account, including a discussion of some of <strong>the</strong><br />

putative managerial advantages of direct government, see Christopher Leman, “Direct<br />

government,” in L.Salamon (ed.) <strong>The</strong> Tools of Government: A Guide to <strong>the</strong> New Governance<br />

(Ox<strong>for</strong>d: Ox<strong>for</strong>d University Press, 2002), pp. 48–79.<br />

34 Stiglitz, pp. 208–9.<br />

35 Evan Davis, Public Spending (London: Penguin, 1998) furnishes a commonsensical<br />

preliminary discussion of <strong>the</strong> economic advantages and potential drawbacks of contractingout;<br />

see especially pp. 208–31.<br />

36 Hrab, Roy, Privatization: Experiences and Prospects, Ontario Panel on <strong>the</strong> Role of<br />

Government, University of Toronto Faculty of Law (2003), p. 8. See also J.S.Vickers and<br />

G.K.Yarrow, Privatization: An Economic Analysis (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988).<br />

37 Shleifer, p. 137.<br />

38 Megginson, W.L. and Netter, J.M., “From state to market: a survey of empirical studies on<br />

privatization,” Journal of Economic Literature, 39 (2001), p. 331.<br />

39 Trebilcock and Iacobucci, supra note 18, p. 1428.<br />

40 Ibid., p. 1429.<br />

41 Hrab, p. 5.<br />

42 Hart, Shleifer and Vishny, supra note 1, p. 1128.<br />

43 Trebilcock, p. 15; Oliver Williamson, “<strong>The</strong> logic of economic organization,” Journal of Law,<br />

Economics and Organization, 4 (1988), p. 77.<br />

44 Hart et al., p. 1128; see also John Donahue, <strong>The</strong> Privatization Decision: Public Ends, Private<br />

Means (New York: Basic Books, 1989), pp. 79–98.<br />

45 Stiglitz, pp. 190–7.<br />

46 Williamson, Oliver, <strong>The</strong> Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press, 1985),<br />

chap. 13.<br />

47 Demsetz, Harold, “Why regulate utilities?,” Journal of Law and Economics, 11 (1968), p.<br />

55.<br />

48 Chapter 3 of this volume discusses <strong>the</strong> cash equivalence of food stamp programmes in more<br />

detail. See also Robert A.Moffitt, “Lessons from <strong>the</strong> food stamp program,” in Steuerle et al.,<br />

pp. 131–5.<br />

49 Mill, John Stuart, “On liberty,” in Robert M.Stewart (ed.) Readings in Political and Social<br />

Philosophy (New York: Ox<strong>for</strong>d University Press, 1996), p. 126.<br />

50 Friedman, p. 178.<br />

51 Yale University Press, 1999.<br />

52 John Richards, Retooling <strong>the</strong> Welfara <strong>State</strong> (Toronto: C.D.Howe Institute, 1997), p. 257<br />

contends that ALMPs are merely synonymous with “workfare” and “tough love” measures;<br />

however, we favour an expanded definition of ALMPs as programmes which tie <strong>the</strong> receipt<br />

of benefits to participation in direct employment, education and placement programmes<br />

which aim to reintegrate underemployed persons into <strong>the</strong> labour market and to increase <strong>the</strong><br />

incentive <strong>for</strong> and access to gainful employment as opposed to reliance on income transfers as<br />

a principal source of revenue.<br />

53 Richards, p. 258.<br />

54 Richards, p. 261.<br />

55 Richards, op. cit.<br />

56 Albert Hirshman, Exit, Voice and Loyalty (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,<br />

1970).<br />

57 Brad<strong>for</strong>d and Shaviro, op. cit.<br />

58 Brad<strong>for</strong>d and Shaviro, op. cit.<br />

59 “Experience goods” are goods whose full attributes are only revealed by usage; “credence<br />

goods” are goods whose attributes are never fully observable by <strong>the</strong> user and entail reliance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!