Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library
Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library
Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Labour market training 207<br />
able to “select among <strong>the</strong> market participants, <strong>the</strong>reby removing <strong>the</strong> poorest per<strong>for</strong>ming<br />
ones.” 129<br />
At <strong>the</strong> second stage of <strong>the</strong> process, <strong>the</strong>re will be a role <strong>for</strong> government to play in<br />
distributing vouchers, but also in collecting and disseminating in<strong>for</strong>mation to participants<br />
about <strong>the</strong> various classroom and on-<strong>the</strong>-job training programs available. Participants will<br />
have strong incentives to identify and select effective training programs. <strong>The</strong>re may also<br />
be a role <strong>for</strong> government in accreditation.<br />
At <strong>the</strong> third stage of <strong>the</strong> program, <strong>the</strong> government would have to maintain involvement<br />
in <strong>the</strong> job-seeking process by setting up a mechanism through which individuals can take<br />
stock of <strong>the</strong>ir needs and abilities and enter ei<strong>the</strong>r a remedial 3Rs education program or<br />
pursue a longer-term more vocationally-oriented program, perhaps at a community<br />
college. A fur<strong>the</strong>r role <strong>for</strong> government at <strong>the</strong> third stage could include extending <strong>the</strong><br />
income-contingent loan program, initially set up <strong>for</strong> those engaged in post-secondary<br />
education (described in Chapter 9) <strong>for</strong> labour market trainees pursuing vocational<br />
education.<br />
Political economy<br />
In both Canada and <strong>the</strong> United <strong>State</strong>s, a mixture of public and private organizations<br />
already provide labour market training. While <strong>the</strong> efficacy of existing programs appears<br />
to be mixed or poor, re<strong>for</strong>ms that entail higher levels of government expenditures are<br />
likely to be resisted by many taxpayers, while those who stand to benefit directly from<br />
labour market training—<strong>the</strong> unemployed or potentially unemployed—are politically<br />
marginalized and do not have a significant voice in public policy debates. In order to<br />
enhance <strong>the</strong> public appeal of a broad-based voucher program <strong>for</strong> labour market training,<br />
it is likely that re<strong>for</strong>ms will need to be widely perceived as beneficial to society as a<br />
whole and not simply <strong>the</strong> unemployed, and as well will mostly entail <strong>the</strong> redeployment of<br />
existing public resources ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong>ir augmentation. One means by which <strong>the</strong> scope<br />
of appeal of voucher-oriented re<strong>for</strong>ms to labour market training programs might be<br />
broadened is to tie <strong>the</strong>se re<strong>for</strong>ms to existing trends in social policy re<strong>for</strong>m. Many of <strong>the</strong><br />
goals of welfare re<strong>for</strong>m are consistent with <strong>the</strong> structure of voucher-oriented labour<br />
market training programs. <strong>The</strong> importance of individual responsibility <strong>for</strong> training<br />
choices and time limits on transfer payments as incentives to pursue job-training<br />
opportunities more effectively are goals that might best be pursued through a joint<br />
strategy that eliminates welfare-dependency (and <strong>the</strong> social pathologies that often<br />
accompany it) and increases <strong>the</strong> general skill levels of unemployed workers.<br />
Conclusions<br />
A voucher prpgram that pays sufficient attention to key design challenges may represent<br />
a major step <strong>for</strong>ward in <strong>the</strong> amelioration of unemployment. Such a program could both<br />
increase <strong>the</strong> range of options available to <strong>the</strong> unemployed and foster competition on <strong>the</strong><br />
supply-side so that job search and training services are continuously improved. If <strong>the</strong> full<br />
potential of a voucher scheme can be tapped, or even approximated, reliance on social<br />
assistance will decrease dramatically—with significant savings <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> state.