Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library
Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library
Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Notes 252<br />
52 Charter schools differ in character based primarily on <strong>the</strong> enabling legislation of <strong>the</strong><br />
jurisdiction in which <strong>the</strong>y operate.<br />
53 It is strange to have local school boards act as a charter-granting institution because <strong>the</strong> local<br />
bureaucracy often has strong interests in favour of job security and <strong>the</strong> integrity of <strong>the</strong> public<br />
school system that run directly counter to encouraging <strong>the</strong> flourishing of an alternative<br />
school system. In fact, this is what has typified <strong>the</strong> Alberta charter school experience, where<br />
only two of twelve charter schools were supported by local school boards. <strong>The</strong> remaining<br />
charters had to be considered and renewed directly by <strong>the</strong> Minister of Education. For a full<br />
discussion, see Lynn Bosetti et al., Canadian Charter Schools at <strong>the</strong> Crossroads (Kelowna,<br />
BC: Society <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Advancement of Excellence in Education, 2000), p. 113; also Lynn<br />
Bosetti, “<strong>The</strong> Alberta charter school experience,” in Claudia R.Hepburn (ed.) Can <strong>the</strong><br />
Market Save Our Schools? (Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 2001), pp. 101–20.<br />
54 Ibid., 2000, p. 113.<br />
55 Ibid., p. 10.<br />
56 Edwin G.West, “Education vouchers in practice and principle: a world survey,” Human<br />
Capital Development and Operations Policy—Working Papers (February, 1996), available<br />
at: http://www.worldbank.org/html/extdr/hnp/hddflash/workp/wp_00064.html. See also<br />
Ladner and Brouilette, supra note 44, p. 396.<br />
57 Claudia Rebanks Hepburn, “<strong>The</strong> case <strong>for</strong> school choice: models from <strong>the</strong> United <strong>State</strong>s, New<br />
Zealand, Denmark, and Sweden,” Fraser Institute Critical Issues Bulletin (1999), available<br />
at: http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/.<br />
58 Ibid., p. 10.<br />
59 Caroline M.Hoxby, supra note 46, p. 4.<br />
60 However, Lin reports that charter schools devote an average of 30 percent of <strong>the</strong>ir revenues<br />
to business and administration as compared with 12 percent <strong>for</strong> non-charter public schools.<br />
Qiuyun Lin, “An evaluation of charter school effectiveness,” Education, 122(1) (2001), p.<br />
171.<br />
61 Caroline M.Hoxby, supra note 46, p. 35.<br />
62 Ibid., p. 61.<br />
63 Ibid., p. 60.<br />
64 Le Grand, supra note 51, Chapter 8.<br />
65 Ibid., p. 109.<br />
66 Ibid., p. 110.<br />
67 Le Grand, supra note 51, p. 113.<br />
68 Beverly Lynn Bosetti et al., Canada’s Charter Schools: Initial Report (Kelowna, BC:<br />
Society <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Advancement of Excellence in Education, 1998), available at:<br />
http://www.excellenceineducation.ca/publications/A_002_AAA_MID.php.<br />
69 Arthur Sweetman, “Ontario’s kindergarten to grade 12 education system: some thoughts <strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> future,” Report to <strong>the</strong> Panel on <strong>the</strong> Role of Government in Ontario (2003), available at:<br />
http://www.law-lib.utoronto.ca/investing/reports/rp25.pdf.<br />
70 Hepburn, supra note 57, p. 20.<br />
71 Ibid.<br />
72 Ibid., p. 18.<br />
73 Ladner and Brouilette, supra note 44, pp. 397–8.<br />
74 Paul E.Peterson, “School choice: a report card,” Virginia Journal of Social Policy and <strong>the</strong><br />
Law, 6 (1998), p. 52.<br />
75 Hepburn, supra note 57, p. 17.<br />
76 Lin, supra note 60.<br />
77 Hepburn, supra note 57, p. 30.<br />
78 Caroline M.Hoxby, supra note 46, p. 22.<br />
79 Ibid.<br />
80 Ibid., p. 23.