08.06.2013 Views

Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library

Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library

Rethinking the Welfare State: The prospects for ... - e-Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Notes 231<br />

49 Tuttle, supra note 4, p. 5.<br />

50 Ibid., p. 3.<br />

51 Ibid., p. 2.<br />

52 Ibid.<br />

53 Although we choose not to engage in a lengthy discussion of <strong>the</strong> precise definition of “food<br />

inadequacy”—<strong>for</strong> our purposes, we assume that <strong>the</strong> level of food inadequacy increases as <strong>the</strong><br />

wealth of a household decreases—Eisinger, supra note 13, pp. 11–20, provides an excellent<br />

analysis of <strong>the</strong> definitional problems with words such as hunger and food inadequacy.<br />

54 Within <strong>the</strong> Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) legislation, <strong>the</strong>re exists a<br />

provision that food stamps will be terminated after an aggregate of three months of<br />

assistance in any 36-month period <strong>for</strong> individuals falling in <strong>the</strong> age bracket of 18–50 who are<br />

not disabled, raising children, working at least 20 hours a week, or participating in job<br />

training programs.<br />

55 Moffitt, supra note 32, pp. 1–3. See also Moffitt, R. and Kehrer, K., “<strong>The</strong> effect of tax and<br />

transfer programs on labor supply: <strong>the</strong> evidence from <strong>the</strong> income maintenance experiments,”<br />

in Ronald Ehrenberg (ed.) Research in Labor Economics, vol. 4 (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press,<br />

1981), pp. 103–50.<br />

56 Moffitt, supra note 32.<br />

57 Richard D.Coe, “Nonparticipation in <strong>the</strong> welfare programs by eligible households: <strong>the</strong> case<br />

of <strong>the</strong> food stamp program,” Journal of Economic Issues, 17 (December, 1983), p. 1036.<br />

58 Marlene Kim and Thanos Mergoupis, “<strong>The</strong> working poor and welfare recipiency:<br />

participation, evidence, and policy directions,” Journal of Economic Issues, 31(3)<br />

(September, 1997), p. 708.<br />

59 Eisinger, supra note 13, p. 50.<br />

60 Ibid., p. 52.<br />

61 Coe, supra note 57, p. 1038.<br />

62 Eisinger, supra note 13, p. 52.<br />

63 Ibid.<br />

64 Ibid.<br />

65 Moffitt, supra note 5, p. 126.<br />

66 Ibid.<br />

67 <strong>The</strong>se comments regarding trafficking are based on Moffitt, ibid.<br />

68 Daniel S.Hamermesh and James M.Johannes, “Food stamps as money: <strong>the</strong> macroeconomics<br />

of a transfer program,” Journal qf Political Economy, 93(1), p. 206.<br />

69 Ibid.<br />

70 Kuhn, supra note 2, p. 195.<br />

71 Ibid., p. 190.<br />

72 A verbal <strong>for</strong>mula is: Value of food stamps=Cost of nutritionally adequate low-cost diet—<br />

0.30 (net income) <strong>The</strong> cost of nutritionally adequate low-cost diet=f(size of family).<br />

73 Kuhn, supra note 2, p. 190.<br />

74 Ibid. In 1993, <strong>the</strong> average monthly benefit per participant was $68 (Kuhn, supra note 191).<br />

75 Tuttle, supra note 4.<br />

4<br />

Low-income housing<br />

1 See e.g., Toronto Disaster Relief Committee, Homelessness in Toronto-<strong>State</strong> of Emergency<br />

Declaration: An Urgent Call <strong>for</strong> Emergency Humanitarian Relief and Prevention Measures<br />

(Toronto: Toronto Disaster Relief Committee, 1998).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!