London scoping - ukcip
London scoping - ukcip
London scoping - ukcip
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Final Report<br />
103<br />
Table 6.2 Summer and winter extreme temperatures for <strong>London</strong> and ‘competitor’ cities<br />
Station Latitude Longitude<br />
Elevation<br />
(metres)<br />
Annual max<br />
Temp. (°C)<br />
<strong>London</strong> (Heathrow Airport) 51.48N 0.45W 24 30.5 -6.3<br />
Toronto 43.67 79.63W 173 33.1 -24.0<br />
Paris (Orly Airport) 48.73N 2.40E 96 33.4 -8.2<br />
Berlin 52.47N 13.40E 49 33.8 -12.2<br />
Rome 41.80N 12.23E 3 34.4 -3.2<br />
Tokyo 35.55N 139.78E 8 34.4 -2.6<br />
New York (JFK Airport)* 40.65N 73.78W 7 35.3 -14.7<br />
Madrid 40.45N 3.55W 582 38.9 -6.8<br />
* John F Kennedy Airport is within the urban area, but adjacent to the sea so likely to be cooler than<br />
central New York.<br />
Annual min<br />
Temp. (°C)<br />
Most of the competitor cities to <strong>London</strong> have a higher temperature baseline than <strong>London</strong>, and<br />
are likely to remain hotter than <strong>London</strong> in the future due to climate change, though not<br />
necessarily by the same difference as currently. As shown in Table 6.2, <strong>London</strong> has the coolest<br />
summers of all the cities. Its winters are colder than Rome and Tokyo, though not as cold as<br />
Madrid despite <strong>London</strong>’s much more northerly location. Toronto is the closest to <strong>London</strong> in<br />
summer extremes, both cities being slightly cooler than Paris. Toronto has much more extreme<br />
winters than <strong>London</strong>, however, whilst Paris is only marginally colder than <strong>London</strong>.<br />
Tokyo and New York are noticeably hotter and more humid than <strong>London</strong> already. Both cities<br />
are coastally-located and therefore vulnerable to sea-level rise. As the Metro East study<br />
covering New York City expresses it: “Many of the region’s most significant infrastructural<br />
facilities will be at increased risk to damage resulting from augmented storm surges”<br />
(Rosenzweig & Solecki 2001a:7). It is difficult to compare the UKCIP02 scenarios with<br />
existing studies of climate change in New York and Japan because different climate models and<br />
specifications have been employed. Nevertheless, the range of temperature changes for Japan<br />
(0.7 to 3°C for a doubling of pre-industrial CO2 concentration which will occur before 2050,<br />
Nishioka & Harasawa 1998) and for New York (1.4 to 3.6°C by the 2050s and 2.4 to 5.7°C by<br />
the 2080s) (Rosenzweig & Solecki 2001), are reasonably similar to those suggested for <strong>London</strong>.<br />
Rainfall changes are more difficult to compare, and for New York at least, they vary<br />
significantly with respect to the different climate models used. As for extreme events, New<br />
York experienced major heat waves in the summer of 1999 and in September 1999, Tropical<br />
Storm Floyd brought large-scale flooding in northern New Jersey and southern New York State<br />
(Rosenzweig & Solecki 2001).<br />
6.5 Attractiveness<br />
We propose here to analyse the potential social impacts of climate change upon <strong>London</strong> by<br />
employing the notion of ‘attractiveness’. Attractiveness is made up of a combination of factors:<br />
economic, lifestyle, socio-cultural, opportunities, cost of living, land availability, and so on.