19.07.2013 Views

London scoping - ukcip

London scoping - ukcip

London scoping - ukcip

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Final Report<br />

118<br />

explored in Tokyo include ‘green roofs’, i.e. using vegetation grown on roof tops to limit heat<br />

gain and to increase heat loss by evapotranspiration from the roots of the trees and shrubs. Such<br />

green roofs do appear to have had some success in temperature moderation within buildings, but<br />

one downside is that they increase the humidity of the air in the immediate vicinity of the<br />

building. Chicago also has a programme of encouraging green roofs (www.cityofchicago.org/<br />

Environment/Airpollution). The Japanese Construction Ministry is also investigating<br />

constructing a large heat exchange system covering some 123 hectares in the centre of Tokyo,<br />

including the Marunouchi business district and Ginza shopping area (Reuters 2002). Water<br />

would be pumped in buried pipes and would collect waste heat from air conditioning systems<br />

before being sent to a heat exchange system on the Tokyo waterfront, where cooler sea water<br />

would be used to absorb the heat. The cooler water would then be pumped back to collect more<br />

waste heat from the city, cooling the local air temperature by between 0.4 and 2.5°C. The<br />

scheme is currently only an idea and would be expensive, costing about $350 million dollars<br />

(pay back time of 30 years due to lower air conditioning costs) (Reuters 2002).<br />

Social Responses to Warmer Domestic Properties<br />

A larger proportion of <strong>London</strong>ers live in flats and apartments and in multiple occupancy<br />

dwellings than elsewhere in the UK. This limits the responses which can be undertaken to some<br />

extent, since you cannot simply ‘go into the garden/backyard’ to cool down. Very few of the<br />

flats being built in <strong>London</strong> have balconies, but this is a well established method for coping with<br />

high summer temperatures used in buildings on the continent. In the social impacts workshop<br />

conducted during this study, there was a joke about ‘Affordable Balconies’ for <strong>London</strong>, but<br />

more seriously it was proposed that building guidelines might explore whether outside space<br />

could be enhanced for all new domestic and commercial property.<br />

Another obvious adjustment to hotter weather is to open windows and doors to let cooler air<br />

replace hotter inside air. This is not always feasible, however, due to the greater risk of crime<br />

arising from open doors and windows, as well as traffic noise and traffic-related pollution. One<br />

finding from the heat wave in Chicago in the mid-1990s was that poorer households felt less<br />

able to open doors and windows because they felt more vulnerable to crime (stakeholder input<br />

to workshop, May 2002). Given that security and crime consistently emerge as prime concerns<br />

of <strong>London</strong>ers, and as the top priority for action to improve <strong>London</strong> as a place to live (MORI<br />

2002), the reluctance to opening doors and windows could easily be as real a phenomenon in<br />

<strong>London</strong> as it is in cities such as Chicago. This would affect less affluent neighbourhoods<br />

disproportionately and hence increase social inequity.<br />

A further adjustment to hotter weather is be outside more often. This would require dwellers of<br />

flats and apartments without balconies to utilise communal space, or public spaces such as parks<br />

and gardens, so increasing pressure upon these. Whether local parks would be sufficient to cope<br />

with a greater demand for more outdoor spaces is not known and depends upon behavioural<br />

change which is impossible to predict. There might well be ‘improvisation’ in such a situation,<br />

utilising street corners, areas outside shops, or outdoor facilities in pubs and cafes. Access to<br />

such areas would not be even, however, since they may not be designed to cope with those with<br />

disabilities for example. Also, such impromptu congregations are unlikely to be welcomed by<br />

all local residents, some of who would perhaps complain about noise and disruption, feel<br />

threatened, etc. An interesting question is whether newly-built housing today should<br />

incorporate design aspects that take account of the likely greater demand in future for more<br />

outdoors living. This might be at the individual dwelling level or communally, e.g. shared areas<br />

of barbecues, outdoor get togethers and entertaining, etc. In Australia, for instance, public

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!