19.07.2013 Views

London scoping - ukcip

London scoping - ukcip

London scoping - ukcip

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Final Report<br />

153<br />

In the case of each sector considered, a summary table is provided that shows:<br />

Climate change variables and associated impacts<br />

The climate change variables that are presented are crude characterisations of the variables<br />

quantified in detail over the different time horizons in the scenarios presented in Section 4. It<br />

was found in the course of the stakeholder consultation that these characterisations were more<br />

useful in eliciting responses as to possible types of impacts. The impacts themselves are rough<br />

encapsulations of the principal impacts described in the main body of text.<br />

Intra-sectoral severity ranking of economic impacts<br />

The climate change impacts presented in each summary table are given a weighting (H = High;<br />

M = Medium; L = Low) according to the perceived severity of the impact on the economic<br />

health of the sector. Where it has not been possible to use a sectoral stakeholder perception (e.g.<br />

in the case of transport) the project team has made a judgement on the severity ranking.<br />

Employment effects associated with impacts<br />

Adopting the principle used in making the severity ranking, the assessment of employment<br />

effects is with regard to the level of employment presently in the industry. It is not therefore an<br />

assessment of the net employment effect in the economy. It should be emphasised that most of<br />

the employment effects identified are diversionary, or represent transfer, within the economy,<br />

rather than creating new jobs. Again, where it has not been possible to use a sectoral<br />

stakeholder perception the project team has made a judgement on the severity of the<br />

employment effect.<br />

Uncertainty rating<br />

Working Group II of the IPCC Third Assessment Report (IPCC, 2001) provides a detailed<br />

rating scale for the degree of uncertainty that is currently attached to specific climate change<br />

impacts globally. We have simplified this rating scale to High, Medium and Low, but present<br />

the broad sectoral rating made by Working Group II for the impact identified for <strong>London</strong>.<br />

Sensitivity to socio-economic scenarios<br />

The socio-economic scenarios are identified in Section 6. Where possible, we have indicated<br />

how each economic impact is likely to be determined by the two different scenarios: Global<br />

Markets (GM), and Regional Sustainability (RS).<br />

Key non climate change sectoral drivers of change<br />

In recognition of the fact that climate change impacts need to be considered in the context of<br />

how the sector is changing more generally, we highlight the principal drivers currently behind<br />

such change. This information should be seen as background information needed to develop a<br />

subsequent adaptation strategy for the sector.<br />

Key stakeholders in impact and adaptation analysis<br />

Identification of key stakeholders is also a prerequisite for looking to develop a subsequent<br />

adaptation strategy for the sector. Before developing such a strategy one would clearly conduct<br />

a full stakeholder analysis that maps the relations between primary and secondary stakeholders.<br />

This is a first task for phase 2 of the current project.<br />

In the final column in the table (‘current availability of adaptation options’):

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!