19.07.2013 Views

London scoping - ukcip

London scoping - ukcip

London scoping - ukcip

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Final Report<br />

134<br />

glistening pebbles gliding playfully, amongst which Holywell, Clerkenwell and St. Clement’s<br />

well are, of most note.” (quoted in Fitter, 1945).<br />

The little River Walbrook flowed openly through the City of <strong>London</strong> in the middle ages,<br />

entering the Thames at the dock of Dowgate. The River Fleet (or Holebourne) was large<br />

enough in medieval times to be navigable to Holborn Bridge. The Fleet then became notorious<br />

as an open sewer (Fitter 1945). These ‘lost rivers’ are now part of the underground sewerage<br />

system. Marshes and fenlands existed throughout <strong>London</strong>, e.g. Moorfields (site of Finsbury<br />

Square today) and much of the West End.<br />

6.13.2 Flooding and Rainfall Intensity Impacts<br />

Such histories are interesting insights into potential futures for <strong>London</strong> in a world of climate<br />

change. Is there opportunity to open-up culverted rivers and streams, or to re-establish<br />

wetlands? Do such water ways and wetlands provide clues regarding where future flooding<br />

might occur?<br />

In addition to this, more stormy weather poses a threat to the integrity of buildings and may<br />

require higher expenditure on repairs and maintenance.<br />

As for archaeological artefacts, the change in the flow patterns of the River Thames has already<br />

resulted in the un-covering of more extensive archaeological remnants. This is to be welcomed<br />

to the extent that it provides more archaeological evidence which can be used to illuminate the<br />

history of the city. On the other hand, however, the uncovering process potentially puts at risk<br />

the integrity and stability of the very remains which are so revealed. More resources may be<br />

required to protect such uncovered remains until such time as they can be stabilised and/or<br />

researched. Continued change in the flow patterns of the River Thames is likely due to sealevel<br />

rise, change in rainfall patterns and adaptation to such changes, e.g. operation of the<br />

Thames Barrier.<br />

6.13.3 Temperature Change Impacts<br />

More resources will probably be required to maintain the integrity of <strong>London</strong>’s historic<br />

buildings and the materials contained therein. For example, internal temperature control will be<br />

an important requirement to protect delicate fabrics, furniture and furnishings.<br />

Soil subsidence from drying out of clay soils could threaten the structural stability of older<br />

buildings. Historical buildings are much less readily adapted to climate change and there are<br />

likely to be planning and regulatory obstacles to any major structural or aesthetic modification.<br />

Hence, such buildings may be less adaptable and readily used than they are currently.<br />

6.13.4 Socio-Economic Scenario Differences<br />

Under GM, there is likely to be more building and re-development. This would result in<br />

potentially larger areas of historic <strong>London</strong> being uncovered and requiring investigation (or<br />

acceptance that this is not feasible). Under RS, there will be a slower pace of change and<br />

probably greater interest in the history of the city.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!