London scoping - ukcip
London scoping - ukcip
London scoping - ukcip
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Final Report<br />
134<br />
glistening pebbles gliding playfully, amongst which Holywell, Clerkenwell and St. Clement’s<br />
well are, of most note.” (quoted in Fitter, 1945).<br />
The little River Walbrook flowed openly through the City of <strong>London</strong> in the middle ages,<br />
entering the Thames at the dock of Dowgate. The River Fleet (or Holebourne) was large<br />
enough in medieval times to be navigable to Holborn Bridge. The Fleet then became notorious<br />
as an open sewer (Fitter 1945). These ‘lost rivers’ are now part of the underground sewerage<br />
system. Marshes and fenlands existed throughout <strong>London</strong>, e.g. Moorfields (site of Finsbury<br />
Square today) and much of the West End.<br />
6.13.2 Flooding and Rainfall Intensity Impacts<br />
Such histories are interesting insights into potential futures for <strong>London</strong> in a world of climate<br />
change. Is there opportunity to open-up culverted rivers and streams, or to re-establish<br />
wetlands? Do such water ways and wetlands provide clues regarding where future flooding<br />
might occur?<br />
In addition to this, more stormy weather poses a threat to the integrity of buildings and may<br />
require higher expenditure on repairs and maintenance.<br />
As for archaeological artefacts, the change in the flow patterns of the River Thames has already<br />
resulted in the un-covering of more extensive archaeological remnants. This is to be welcomed<br />
to the extent that it provides more archaeological evidence which can be used to illuminate the<br />
history of the city. On the other hand, however, the uncovering process potentially puts at risk<br />
the integrity and stability of the very remains which are so revealed. More resources may be<br />
required to protect such uncovered remains until such time as they can be stabilised and/or<br />
researched. Continued change in the flow patterns of the River Thames is likely due to sealevel<br />
rise, change in rainfall patterns and adaptation to such changes, e.g. operation of the<br />
Thames Barrier.<br />
6.13.3 Temperature Change Impacts<br />
More resources will probably be required to maintain the integrity of <strong>London</strong>’s historic<br />
buildings and the materials contained therein. For example, internal temperature control will be<br />
an important requirement to protect delicate fabrics, furniture and furnishings.<br />
Soil subsidence from drying out of clay soils could threaten the structural stability of older<br />
buildings. Historical buildings are much less readily adapted to climate change and there are<br />
likely to be planning and regulatory obstacles to any major structural or aesthetic modification.<br />
Hence, such buildings may be less adaptable and readily used than they are currently.<br />
6.13.4 Socio-Economic Scenario Differences<br />
Under GM, there is likely to be more building and re-development. This would result in<br />
potentially larger areas of historic <strong>London</strong> being uncovered and requiring investigation (or<br />
acceptance that this is not feasible). Under RS, there will be a slower pace of change and<br />
probably greater interest in the history of the city.