London scoping - ukcip

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Final Report 257 • Impacts on national, international designated species • Species rising - completion, dynamics • Increased tourism pressure • Brownfield - impact on biodiversity/habitats • Soil erosion + tree damage Water Quality (4 Votes) Flooding (6 votes) • Drinking water quality • River SLR/saline • Ground proposing more deep levels • Shellfish & human health • Worsens more treatment needed but no room • Hence - Intensive treatment • Hence - Energy intensive • Sedimentation - from upstream & in London • London Underground already being pumped • Assets STW ‘standard’ • Convective storms in London • Urban ‘flashy’ • Thames Gateway • Coastal squeezes (also biodiversity) • Flood defenses raised • Access + visual affected • How to manage - hard/soft higher defenses when they are breached catastrophe Water Resources (4 votes) • London depends on external sources (incl. reservoirs) • Conflicts over use e.g. for drinking Vs nature conservation • Rising groundwater - could tap into this - local treatment needed • Winter storage?
Sewage • Resource = finite/reducing Final Report 258 • Demand increase with Climate Change - grey water storage/rainwater harvesting • Foul flooding cut across all sectors • Urban area any building very disruptive + difficult Waste Management • All goes outside London • Increased emphases on recycling more incinerators (air quality), re-use, landfills are full • Increasing offices - paper and electronic equipment (computers) • Contaminated land & ground water • Contaminated in landfill sites Riverside Development • Air quality • Odours/rats health • Flooding • Biodiversity loss • Access Transport (2 votes) • Construction of schemes environmental impacts • Storm damage • Insurance • Air quality • Noise Impact 1 - Air Quality Discuss the consequences of this impact for London • Cycling of carbon - ‘human/animals (short time scale) % fossil fuel etc. - long time scale • Sulphates - declining • N-growing problem
Page 1 and 2:
london’swarming The Impacts of Cl
Page 3 and 4:
London Climate Change Partnership A
Page 5 and 6:
Contents Final Report i Executive S
Page 7 and 8:
Final Report iii 5.8 Bibliography 8
Page 9 and 10:
Final Report v 7.3.3 Case Study 156
Page 11 and 12:
Final Report vii 8.5.1 Monitoring I
Page 13 and 14:
Final Report ix Figure 3.3 River Th
Page 15 and 16:
Executive Summary Final Report xi T
Page 17 and 18:
Final Report xiii building and urba
Page 19 and 20:
Final Report 2 There are two study
Page 21 and 22:
Final Report 4
Page 23 and 24:
Final Report 6 In this study histor
Page 25 and 26:
Final Report 8
Page 27 and 28:
Final Report 10 anomalies close to
Page 29 and 30:
"Hot" day anomaly (days) Final Repo
Page 31 and 32:
Final Report 14 3.3 Precipitation (
Page 33 and 34:
Final Report 16 Table 3.1 The five
Page 35 and 36:
Final Report 18 Figure 3.6 Number o
Page 37 and 38:
Final Report 20 1900’s, 1940’s,
Page 39 and 40:
Final Report 22 Figure 3.9 Days wit
Page 41 and 42:
metres AOD Final Report 24 Figure 3
Page 43 and 44:
Final Report 26 Figure 3.13 Number
Page 45 and 46:
Final Report 28 quality is monitore
Page 47 and 48:
Final Report 30 Table 3.2 Nature co
Page 49 and 50:
ad11:users:ad11:desktop:final tech
Page 51 and 52:
Final Report 34 Table 3.4 Exemplar
Page 53 and 54:
Climate indicators Recent trend Fin
Page 55 and 56:
Final Report 38 Marsh, T.J. and Mon
Page 57 and 58:
Final Report 40
Page 59 and 60:
Final Report 42 Table 4.2 Consensus
Page 61 and 62:
Final Report 44 Table 4.4 Summary o
Page 63 and 64:
Final Report 46 Figure 4.1 Referenc
Page 65 and 66:
Final Report 48 Precipitation By th
Page 67 and 68:
Final Report 50 Sea Level Rates of
Page 69 and 70:
Final Report 52 representing the un
Page 71 and 72:
Final Report 54 Figure 4.7 Winter (
Page 73 and 74:
Final Report 56 4.7 Statistical Dow
Page 75 and 76:
Final Report 58 1961-90 plus 0.26º
Page 77 and 78:
Final Report 60
Page 79 and 80:
Final Report 62 temperature between
Page 81 and 82:
Final Report 64 Table 5.2 Potential
Page 83 and 84:
Final Report 66 without climate cha
Page 85 and 86:
Final Report 68 paradox is explaine
Page 87 and 88:
Final Report 70 Table 5.4 Changes i
Page 89 and 90:
Final Report 72 to withstand floods
Page 91 and 92:
Final Report 74 Figure 5.5 The 60-d
Page 93 and 94:
Final Report 76 Figure 5.6 The area
Page 95 and 96:
Final Report 78 use/restoration of
Page 97 and 98:
Final Report 80 The most important
Page 99 and 100:
Final Report 82 of air pollution co
Page 101 and 102:
Final Report 84 5.6.6 Adaptation Op
Page 103 and 104:
Final Report 86 Issues Climate vari
Page 105 and 106:
Final Report 88 Davis, R.J. 2001. T
Page 107 and 108:
Final Report 90 Klein, R.J.T., Nich
Page 109 and 110:
Final Report 92 Reed, D.J. 1990. Th
Page 111 and 112:
Final Report 94
Page 113 and 114:
Final Report 96 and water supply (e
Page 115 and 116:
Final Report 98 Medium-Low Emission
Page 117 and 118:
Final Report 100 Variable Global Ma
Page 119 and 120:
Final Report 102 6.4 Need for a Com
Page 121 and 122:
Final Report 104 Figure 6.2 aims to
Page 123 and 124:
Final Report 106 London’s attract
Page 125 and 126:
Final Report 108 Figure 6.3 Autonom
Page 127 and 128:
Final Report 110 levels of confiden
Page 129 and 130:
Final Report 112 with some arguing
Page 131 and 132:
Final Report 114 reducing the H/W r
Page 133 and 134:
Final Report 116 groundwater storag
Page 135 and 136:
Final Report 118 explored in Tokyo
Page 137 and 138:
Final Report 120 Temperature Change
Page 139 and 140:
Final Report 122 development on bro
Page 141 and 142:
Final Report 124 requirement for fu
Page 143 and 144:
Final Report 126 Figure 6.4 Flows o
Page 145 and 146:
Final Report 128 6.11 Lifestyles an
Page 147 and 148:
Final Report 130 2050s (DoH 2002).
Page 149 and 150:
Final Report 132 Table 6.4 Potentia
Page 151 and 152:
Final Report 134 glistening pebbles
Page 153 and 154:
Final Report 136 is because there w
Page 155 and 156:
Final Report 138 the very hottest w
Page 157 and 158:
Final Report 140 Local meetings are
Page 159 and 160:
Final Report 142 workshop in which
Page 161 and 162:
Final Report 144 is important to no
Page 163 and 164:
Final Report 146 Table 6.5 Summary
Page 165 and 166:
Final Report 148 Martens, W. (1996)
Page 167 and 168:
Final Report 150
Page 169 and 170:
Final Report 152 Box 1 A profile of
Page 171 and 172:
Final Report 154 ‘Y’ indicates
Page 173 and 174:
Final Report 156 Impacts Due to Win
Page 175 and 176:
Final Report 158 months would resul
Page 177 and 178:
7.3.6 Road Transport Final Report 1
Page 179 and 180:
Final Report 162 It was suggested i
Page 181 and 182:
Table 7.3 Summary Table of Impacts
Page 183 and 184:
Final Report 166 In fact it is esti
Page 185 and 186:
Table 7.4 Summary table of impacts
Page 187 and 188:
Final Report 170 that a significant
Page 189 and 190:
Final Report 172 than concrete and
Page 191 and 192:
Final Report 174 through the implem
Page 193 and 194:
7.6 Financial Services Final Report
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Final Report 180 7.7.4 Impacts Due
Page 199 and 200:
Final Report 182 7.8 Environmental
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Final Report 187 Table 7.9 Potentia
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Final Report 195 business strategy,
Page 214 and 215:
Final Report 197 Sir William Halcro
Page 216 and 217:
Final Report 8. Summary and Policy
Page 218 and 219:
Issue Main Points Biodiversity Buil
Page 220 and 221:
Issue Main Points Final Report 203
Page 222 and 223:
Climate Impact Adaptation Options L
Page 224 and 225: Final Report 207 and will bear the
Page 226 and 227: Final Report 209 In an RS world, th
Page 228 and 229: Final Report 211 newcomers from acr
Page 230 and 231: Final Report 213 policies also stat
Page 232 and 233: 8.4.2 London Development Agency Fin
Page 234 and 235: Final Report 217 present study as w
Page 236 and 237: Final Report 219 • Could develope
Page 238 and 239: Final Report 221 consider recreatio
Page 240 and 241: 8.4.7 London Biodiversity Partnersh
Page 242 and 243: Final Report 225 8.5.5 Health and C
Page 244 and 245: Final Report 227 It is particularly
Page 246 and 247: 9. Conclusions 9.1 Initial Study Fi
Page 248 and 249: Final Report 231 frequency and inte
Page 250 and 251: Final Report 233 • Engaged a wide
Page 252 and 253: London Waste Thames Gateway London
Page 254 and 255: Aim of the Workshop Final Report 23
Page 256 and 257: Final Report 239 Table 2 Summary of
Page 258 and 259: Final Report 241 The notes made by
Page 260 and 261: Final Report 243 • Past populatio
Page 262 and 263: • Local Government implementation
Page 264 and 265: • Water table • Air conditionin
Page 266 and 267: • London Health Observatory Final
Page 268 and 269: Flooding Water Resources Air Qualit
Page 270 and 271: • Landfill location by river Fina
Page 272 and 273: • Tensions are limits to growth F
Page 276 and 277: Final Report 259 • How will atmos
Page 278 and 279: Final Report 261 • Learn from cli
Page 280 and 281: Government Cultural Heritage • De
Page 282 and 283: Final Report 265 Where or who is ex
Page 284 and 285: • Business - transport + infrastr
Page 286 and 287: ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES Final Report
Page 288 and 289: Final Report 271 • Increased risk
Page 290 and 291: Final Report 273 • In Central Lon
Page 292 and 293: WORKSHOP EVALUATION Final Report 27
Page 294 and 295: Final Report 277 further study to e
Page 296 and 297: Final Report 279 Geoff Jenkins Hadl
Page 298 and 299: Final Report 281 Appendix C Represe
Page 300 and 301: Final Report 283 Climate prediction
Page 302 and 303: Final Report 285 GQA General Qualit
Page 304 and 305: Final Report 287 Stochastic A proce
Page 306 and 307: crime arising from extreme weather
Page 308 and 309: open spaces 113, 136-8, 212 increas
Page 310 and 311: tunnels (cont) stability 110 Tyndal
show all

London scoping - ukcip

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?