19.07.2013 Views

London scoping - ukcip

London scoping - ukcip

London scoping - ukcip

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Final Report<br />

21<br />

Figure 3.8 River Thames flow anomalies at Teddington in winter and summer (naturalised), 1883-<br />

2002. Anomalies are relative to 1961-1990 average.<br />

Winter flow anomaly (cumecs)<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

-50<br />

-100<br />

-150<br />

1881 1891 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001<br />

Daily data for Teddington provide an indication of the changing pattern of high flows on the<br />

Thames (defined herein as mean daily flows exceeding 250 cubic metres per second, or<br />

cumecs). Although the last 30-50 years show strong evidence of increases in the number of<br />

high flows, this period is not particularly unusual in the context of the entire record – there have<br />

been flow rich periods in the past, most notably the 1920’s (Figure 3.9). This is consistent with<br />

the national picture of no clear long-term trend in flood peaks, flood volumes or duration of<br />

flood flows (Marsh, 2001a, b; Robson et al., 1998). However, the flows of October to<br />

December 2000 were the most extreme in terms of England and Wales 90-days totals (CEH and<br />

Meteorological Office, 2001). In <strong>London</strong> two hundred households in Woodford, 75 in<br />

Edmonton and Wanstead were flooded (ABI, 2002). In terms of the maximum recorded mean<br />

daily flows at Teddington since 1900, the snowmelt event of 1947 was the highest on record<br />

(714 cumecs), with the maximum flow of 2000 (464 cumecs) ranked just 50 th . The longest<br />

duration of flows above 250 cumecs occurred in the winter of 1951 following the wettest<br />

February on record (+174% of the 1961-1990 average).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!