Barriers to Diversity in Film – A Research Review – Aug 07

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Steele D (2004) “Developing the Evidence base for UK Film Strategy: The Research Process at the UK Film Council” Cultural Trends Vol 13 (4) no 52, December pp 5-21 Steinke J (2005) ‘Cultural Representations of Gender and Science: Portrayals of Female Scientists and Engineers in Popular Films’ Science Communication 27; 27 Sage: London and USA Stonewall (2006) “Gay people your business” London: Stonewall Strategic Market Assessment for the Professional (1998) ‘The Pink Pound 1998’ from Stonewall: London Thornham S (2003) ‘A Good Body’: The case of /for feminist studies’ European Journal of Cultural Studies 6; 75 Sage: London and USA Tucker A (2004) “Diversity Initiatives Are they really making a difference?” The Independent Film and Video Monthly April pp 43-45 UK Film Council (2004-5) Statistical Yearbook Annual Review London : UK Film Council UK Film Council (2005-6) Statistical Yearbook Annual Review London : UK Film Council UK Film Council (2006-7) Statistical Yearbook, London : UK Film Council UK Film Council (accessed 2007) Diversity www.ukfilmcouncil.org.uk/information/aboutus/diversity UK Film Council (2006) “Employment Statistics” Group and Lottery Annual Report and Financial Statements 2005-6 UK Film Council: London UK Film Council and Era Ltd (2006-7) “Identities” Brochure produced by UK Film Council and others London: Identities Partnership UK Film Council and National Council for Drama Training (undated) “Minority Ethnic Actors- Summary of Research Findings” London: UK Film Council C:\Documents and Settings\mcorless\Desktop\Intranet\Barriers to Diversity in Film_DS_RB 20 Aug 07.doc 204
UN (2000) “Gender and Racial Discrimination” Report of the Expert Group Meeting UN Division for the Advancement of Women 21-24 November Zagreb, Croatia (Submission by K Crenshaw) van Dijk T (1993) Elite Discourse and Racism London: Sage Watson P (2001) Pitch Black: From the margin to the mainstream National Film and Television School Wax R G (2000) “Lights, Camera, Access!” in Emmy June pp 106-116 White A and Rughani P (2003) “Imagine Asian Evaluation Report” London : bfi publishing Wilson J Associates (2003) ‘Cultural Diversity and Audience Development : A report summarizing learning points and case studies from Arts Council England’s New Audiences Programme’ Bradford, W. Yorks : J Wilson Associates Wilson EM and Iles PA (1999) “Managing Diversity: an employment and service delivery challenge” in International Journal of Public Sector Management Vol. 12 (1) pp27-48 Women and Work Commission (2006) Shaping a Fairer Future dti: London February Crown Copyright Zadek S and Scott Parker S (2001) Unlocking the evidence :The New Disability Business Case Employers Forum on Disability: London Zuckerman E W and Kim T Y ‘The Critical Trade off: identity assignment and box office success in the feature film industry’ Industrial and Corporate Change Vol 12 , No 1 pp 27-67 C:\Documents and Settings\mcorless\Desktop\Intranet\Barriers to Diversity in Film_DS_RB 20 Aug 07.doc 205
Page 1 and 2:
Barriers to Diversity in Film A Res
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTS Executive summary 7 1 Intr
Page 5 and 6:
3.4 Barriers to progression through
Page 7 and 8:
6.2 The business context 106 6.3 Th
Page 9 and 10:
Executive Summary The review has in
Page 11 and 12:
• Young people need advice on the
Page 13 and 14:
• Disabled people are under-repre
Page 15 and 16:
• Monitor sexual orientation, but
Page 17 and 18:
1.1 Aims 1 Introduction: aims and s
Page 19 and 20:
This review brings together researc
Page 21 and 22:
The Select Committee on Culture, Me
Page 23 and 24:
2.2 Cinema audiences and film relea
Page 25 and 26:
including tackling social exclusion
Page 27 and 28:
2.4 The changing population The UK
Page 29 and 30:
2.5 Diversity and equality of oppor
Page 31 and 32:
The Act also has implications for c
Page 33 and 34:
A new inclusive equalities agenda t
Page 35 and 36:
sectoral and labour market change.
Page 37 and 38:
critical of the failure of equality
Page 39 and 40:
• If the film sector increased th
Page 41 and 42:
3: The film workforce Getting the r
Page 43 and 44:
3.2 Workforce data on under-represe
Page 45 and 46:
Table 3.1 Film and video industry w
Page 47 and 48:
data in these statistics on gender
Page 49 and 50:
London 2006 s 2006 London 2002 e (L
Page 51 and 52:
Other 65 35 All 61 39 Source : 2006
Page 53 and 54:
ecause film professionals from mino
Page 55 and 56:
male respondents earned £50,000 or
Page 57 and 58:
Of 106 applications to the New Cine
Page 59 and 60:
South West 6 23 Source: Skillset an
Page 61 and 62:
Most employees are recruited inform
Page 63 and 64:
and minority ethnic people tending
Page 65 and 66:
3.3.7 Qualifications The 2005 Featu
Page 67 and 68:
very small numbers reported going o
Page 69 and 70:
over their future finances. They al
Page 71 and 72:
women experience ageing differently
Page 73 and 74:
stereotyped as working class, even
Page 75 and 76:
3.4.9 Commissioning and ‘ghettois
Page 77 and 78:
older than the rest of the workforc
Page 79 and 80:
Social benefits from the projects w
Page 81 and 82:
for women who have caring responsib
Page 83 and 84:
involved in a regular dialogue abou
Page 85 and 86:
population, though the regional dis
Page 87 and 88:
Table 4.1 Cinema audience by gender
Page 89 and 90:
Table 4.3 Cinema audience by gender
Page 91 and 92:
Cinema goers 13.1 86.9 PPV buyers 1
Page 93 and 94:
general population (perhaps excludi
Page 95 and 96:
4.4 Audiences for film on televisio
Page 97 and 98:
Science fiction 1.7 7.1 1.8 7 1.1 3
Page 99 and 100:
they were charming and displayed a
Page 101 and 102:
‘Respectable cinema’ including
Page 103 and 104:
4.6 Barriers to cinema attendance B
Page 105 and 106:
launched an online Diversity Toolki
Page 107 and 108:
• Half of people over 55 never go
Page 109 and 110:
o initiatives to improve the distri
Page 111 and 112:
All these debates are considered be
Page 113 and 114:
5.3 Employment and portrayal Does e
Page 115 and 116:
5.5 Stereotypes The stereotypical p
Page 117 and 118:
Russo analysed representation of ga
Page 119 and 120:
than homosexual (Cover op.cit.). Ho
Page 121 and 122:
ecause she is lesbian specifically
Page 123 and 124:
analyses 150 films and concludes th
Page 125 and 126:
The reasons for this under-represen
Page 127 and 128:
Reasons behind the illnesses and th
Page 129 and 130:
In a major report on the black and
Page 131 and 132:
national stereotyping such as funny
Page 133 and 134:
indiscriminate killing implies that
Page 135 and 136:
people who live abroad like to hang
Page 137 and 138:
However, a study in Sweden analysed
Page 139 and 140:
the ways these film types have deve
Page 141 and 142:
and ethnicity, and in any case, mon
Page 143 and 144:
• A study of on-screen representa
Page 145 and 146:
occupational groups, people from di
Page 147 and 148:
Our society has changed dramaticall
Page 149 and 150:
6.3 The business case - an overview
Page 151 and 152:
2007). The Commission for Racial Eq
Page 153 and 154: eing disabled. The importance of th
Page 155 and 156: in Western style holidays, but UK t
Page 157 and 158: this specific audience and making a
Page 159 and 160: Positive actions on race equality i
Page 161 and 162: For example, women’s presence in
Page 163 and 164: 6.3.7 Legal compliance Companies ha
Page 165 and 166: • Studies on the business case in
Page 167 and 168: Access to employment in the sector
Page 169 and 170: cinema tickets and rental films, an
Page 171 and 172: have children. Women scientists are
Page 173 and 174: teams encourage creativity. Recruit
Page 175 and 176: minority ethnic women writers or pr
Page 177 and 178: 7.5.7 Decision makers’ attitudes
Page 179 and 180: There is also a need for policy int
Page 181 and 182: has rarely been evaluated for its l
Page 183 and 184: The Leadership on Diversity Forum,
Page 185 and 186: as the key intervention in diversit
Page 187 and 188: housing management. Trainees felt c
Page 189 and 190: voice to otherwise marginalised and
Page 191 and 192: targeted funding for black and mino
Page 193 and 194: Bhavnani R (1994) Black Women in th
Page 195 and 196: Cowan K and Valentine G (2006) “T
Page 197 and 198: European Commission (2005) “The B
Page 199 and 200: 199 Institute for Employment Studie
Page 201 and 202: Murphy R (ed.) (2000) British Cinem
Page 203: Skillset and Equity (2006) “Analy
show all

Barriers to Diversity in Film – A Research Review – Aug 07

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?