Fsnau-Post-Gu-2012-Technical-Report

Recommendations

Info

Appendices 134 3. SEEDS 3.1 Did the farmers within the following households have enough seeds at the beginning of this Gu season? Household Type 1.Yes 2.No a. Poor b. Middle c. Better-‐off 3.2 If No, what proportion of farmers lacked seeds for planting of cereals in this Gu season and why? Household Type 1. Proportion 2. Why (give reasons) a. Poor b. Middle c. Better-‐off 3.3 In your opinion, did female-‐headed households experience a similar level of seed shortage in this Gu season? 1. Yes [ ] 2. No [ ] If not, please explain why__________________________________________________ 3.4 What was the source of the seeds for the majority of the households in this Gu season (disaggregate asnwer by wealth groups and female-‐headed households and tick where appropriate)? a. Poor b. Middle c. Better-‐ Source of seeds HH HH off 1. From own stocks 2. Purchase of new seeds 3. Free distribution by humanitarian agencies 4. Gifts 5. Borrowing 6. Other (specify) __________________ 7. Other (specify) __________________ 8. Other (specify) __________________ MHH -‐ FHH MHH -‐FHH MHH -‐ FHH 3.6 What was the seed situation (quality and availabity) in this Gu season compared with a normal Gu? (Tick where appropriate) 1.Worse 2.Same 3.Better 4.Do not know a. Quality Give reasons b. Availability Give reasons FSNAU Technical Series Report No. VI 48 Issued October 18, 2012 2
4. FERTILIZER 4.1 a) Did the majority of households have access to any fertilizers this season? 1. Yes [ ] 2. No [ ] b) If YES in (a), what was the source of fertilizers? Source of fertilizer Tick 1. Free distribution 2. Purchased 3. Gift 4. No access 5. Other (specify) ______________________ 6. Other (specify) ______________________ 4.2 Which households experienced most difficulties in accessing fertilizers this season? (tick where appropriate) 1. Poor [ ] 2. Middle [ ] 3. Better-‐off [ ] 4.3 In your opinion, did female-‐headed households experience any exceptional difference in accessing fertilizer? 1. Yes [ ] 2. No [ ] If yes, please explain why?______________________________________________ 5. PLANTING 5.1 What were the main crops planted during this Gu season? 1. Sorghum [ ] 2. Maize [ ] 3. Sesame [ ] 4.Cowpea [ ] 5.Other (specify):__________________ [ ] 5.2 What was the total cultivated area in the village in this Gu season? ____________Ha 5.3 a) Did all the farmers within the village plant? 1. Yes [ ] 2. No [ ] b) If ‘NO’, what is the proportion of farmers that did not plant and why (explain below)? _______% c) Were female-‐headed households able to plant the same percentage of their normal crop as male-‐headed households? If not, why not? Reasons for not planting: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5.4 Compared to the normal situation, when did most of the farmers plant the main crops in this Gu season? 1. Early [ ] 2. On time [ ] 3. Late [ ] 4. Never [ ] 5.5 How was the seed germination this season? Crop 1.Failure 2. Poor 3. Average 4. Good 5 Explain why a. Maize b. Sorghum c. Rice d. Others (specify)____________ e. Others (specify)____________ f. Others (specify)____________ 5.6 Did a significant number of farmers have to re-‐plant? (If the answer is No, please skip to 5.9) 1. Yes [ ] 2. No [ ] 3 FSNAU Technical Series Report No. VI 48 Issued October 18, 2012 Appendices 135
Page 1 and 2:
Technical Partners Swiss Agency for
Page 3 and 4:
Acknowledgement FSNAU would like to
Page 5 and 6:
5.11.4 Livestock Herd Dynamics Juba
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 41: Trends in Terms of Trade
Page 9 and 10:
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 KEY FINDIN
Page 11 and 12:
Table 3: Distribution of Rural and
Page 13 and 14:
Map 2: Somalia Acute Food Insecurit
Page 15 and 16:
over the last 12 months. However, l
Page 17 and 18:
and 4) was estimated at 100,000 (5,
Page 19 and 20:
security situation of the poor past
Page 21 and 22:
Table 4: Overview of Gu 2012 Assess
Page 23 and 24:
Adoption of IPC Technical Manual Ve
Page 25 and 26:
Figure 1: Time-series data of NDVI/
Page 27 and 28:
3.2 civil insecurity EVENTS Civil i
Page 29:
3.3 agriculture Area Cultivated und
Page 32 and 33:
Sectors 24 Local cereal prices (mai
Page 34 and 35:
Sectors 26 3.4 livestocK sector Bac
Page 36 and 37:
Sectors 28 Livestock Trade and Pric
Page 38 and 39:
Sectors 30 3.5 marKets and trade Ex
Page 40 and 41:
Sectors 32 3.6 nutrition situation
Page 42 and 43:
Urban Analysis 34 Evolution of food
Page 44 and 45:
Urban Analysis 36 4. intEGrAtEd foo
Page 46 and 47:
Urban Analysis 38 Social Capital So
Page 48 and 49:
IDP Analysis 40 Given the security
Page 50 and 51:
IDP Analysis 42 Figure 23: Sources
Page 52 and 53:
Regional Analysis 44 4.3 SOMALIA’
Page 54 and 55:
Regional Analysis 46 decreased by 2
Page 56 and 57:
Regional Analysis 48 4.3.2 LOwER AN
Page 58 and 59:
Regional Analysis 50 Average cattle
Page 60 and 61:
Regional Analysis 52 4.3.3 BAY AND
Page 62 and 63:
Regional Analysis 54 facilities cla
Page 64 and 65:
Regional Analysis 56 4.3.4 LOwER AN
Page 66 and 67:
Regional Analysis 58 The population
Page 68 and 69:
Regional Analysis 60 4.3.5 hIRAN RE
Page 70 and 71:
Regional Analysis 62 in addition to
Page 72 and 73:
Regional Analysis 64 4.3.6 CENTRAL
Page 74 and 75:
Regional Analysis 66 These househol
Page 76 and 77:
Regional Analysis 68 4.3.7 NORThEAS
Page 78 and 79:
Regional Analysis 70 Physical Capit
Page 80 and 81:
Regional Analysis 72 4.3.8 NORThwES
Page 82 and 83:
Regional Analysis 74 Table 31: Nort
Page 84 and 85:
Regional Regional Analysis 76 Avera
Page 87 and 88:
Among the Mogadishu IDP women, food
Page 89 and 90:
5. Appendices 5.1.1 BAcKGROUnd And
Page 91 and 92: Appendices 83 Acute Food Insecurity
Page 93 and 94: Appendices 85 5.2.1 Time-Series of
Page 95 and 96: 5.2.2 Time-Series of the Integrated
Page 97 and 98: 5.3.2 Progression of Rural Humanita
Page 99 and 100: 5.3.4 progression of Rural Humanita
Page 101 and 102: 5.3.6 progression of Rural Humanita
Page 103 and 104: 5.3.8 progression of the Rural Huma
Page 105 and 106: 5.3.9 Progression of Rural Humanita
Page 107 and 108: 5.3.10 Progression of Rural Humanit
Page 109 and 110: 5.4.2 estimated RURAL population in
Page 111 and 112: 5.4.3 estimated URBAn population in
Page 113 and 114: 5.4.4 estimated RURAL population in
Page 115 and 116: 5.6 LisT OF pARTneRs WHO pARTicipAT
Page 117 and 118: 5.7 post Gu ‘12 Food security sea
Page 119 and 120: 5.9 post Gu ‘12 IDP Matrix FCS -
Page 121 and 122: 5.10.3 Livestock Herd dynamics cent
Page 123 and 124: 8 9 What was the main reason for th
Page 125 and 126: 8.1 b. Cattle c. Sheep d. Goat e. p
Page 127 and 128: 5.12.3 Key informant/Focus Groups Q
Page 129 and 130: observed mostly? 6.7 What triggered
Page 131 and 132: Jan 2011- now a. Camels b. Cattle c
Page 133 and 134: 5.12.5 cereal Flow survey THe FOOd
Page 135 and 136: 9. Has there been any cereal outflo
Page 137 and 138: 2 2.3 What was the source of the se
Page 139 and 140: 4 4. 0 CROP CONDITION 4.1 What is t
Page 141: 5.12.7 Gu ‘12 season crop Assesme
Page 145 and 146: 6.5 What were the crop production c
Page 147 and 148: 5.12.8 idp Household survey Questio
Page 149 and 150: 3.5 Did your household receive any
Page 151 and 152: Page 2 of 7 5.12.9 idp Assessment Q
Page 153 and 154: 4 LIVELIHOOD STRATEGIES 4.1 What we
Page 155 and 156: school in the last three months wha
Page 157 and 158: 3.2 What was the source of income o
Page 159 and 160: Page 1 of 1 5.12.11 Urban FGd south
Page 161 and 162: 5. Casual/labour wage (from portage
Page 163 and 164: 2.2. What was the source of income
Page 165 and 166: Part 1: Analysis of Current Imminen
Page 167 and 168: their dietary needs, and food prefe
Page 169 and 170: Rapid assessment: undertaken follow
Page 171 and 172: FSNAU Technical Series Report No. V
show all

Fsnau-Post-Gu-2012-Technical-Report

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?