Fsnau-Post-Gu-2012-Technical-Report

Recommendations

Info

Appendices 82 • Clarifying the technical consensus process • Restructuring the IPC analysis templates to improve usability and analytical rigor • Introducing simple tools for identifying causes. • Introducing tools and further <strong>Gu</strong>idelines for quality assurance IPC Version 2.0 distinguishes between two conditions of food insecurity - acute and chronic. Acute food insecurity is a snapshot in time of the current or projected severity of the situation, regardless of the causes, context, or duration. Chronic food insecurity is the prevalence of persistent food insecurity, that is, levels of food insecurity that continue even in the absence of hazards/shocks or high frequency of years with acute food insecurity. For acute food insecurity, the IPC has two units of classification: Area-based (i.e., the overall population within a given area), and Household Group-based (i.e., relatively homogenous groups of households with regards to food security outcomes). Acute Food insecurity Reference Table for Area Classification provides Reference Outcomes (Food Consumption, Livelihood Change, Nutritional Status, and Mortality) and General Response Objectives for five Phases of Acute Food Insecurity for the population in a given area (Table 1). Unless otherwise stated, the analysis is based on the whole population in the area. Within a given area, there can be multiple groups of households experiencing different Phases of food insecurity. Acute Food insecurity Reference Table for Household Group Classification provides a general description, reference outcomes, and General Response Objectives for five Phases of Acute Food Insecurity at the household level (Table 33). In this way, groups of relatively homogenous households can be classified in different Phases within a given area. The reference indicators are organized according to the IPC Analytical Framework. These include Outcomes of household food security (Food Consumption, Livelihood Change, Acute Nutritional Food Insecurity Status, Reference Mortality) Table and Contributing for Area Classification Factors (Hazards & Vulnerability, Food Availability, Access, Utilization, and Stability, Human water requirements). Table 32: Acute Food Insecurity Reference Table for Area Classification Area Outcomes Phase Name and Description Food Consumption & Livelihood Change Nutritional Status Mortality General Response Objectives Phase 1 Minimal More than 80% of households in the area are comfortably able to meet basic food needs without atypical coping strategies & livelihoods are stable Wasting Prevalence:
Appendices 83 Acute Food Insecurity Reference Table for Household Group Classification Table 33: Acute Food Purpose: Insecurity To guide Reference short term strategic Table for objectives Household linked to Group medium Classification and long term objectives <strong>Gu</strong> ‘12 Household Outcomes (measure or inferred) Contributing Factors Phase Name and Description Food Consumption (Quantity & Nutritional Quality) Livelihood Change (Assets & Strategies) Nutritional Status (due to food deficits) Mortality Food Availability, Access, Utilization, and Stability Water Hazards & Vulnerability General Response Objectives Phase 1 None · HH group is able to meet basic food needs without atypical coping strategies. HH group is able to meet basic food needs without atypical coping strategies. Livelihood: Sustainable strategies and assets Coping Strategies: normal and not irreversible No presence of mildly acutely malnourished child and/or mother in households Phase 2 Stressed Even with any current or projected humanitarian assistance: · HH group food consumption is reduced but minimally adequate without having to engage in irreversible coping strategies. Quantity: minimally adequate (2,100kcal pp/day) & unstable HDDS: deterioration of HDDS (loss of 1 food group from typical, based on 12 food groups) FCS: acceptable consumption (but deteriorating) HHS: none or slight ( 0-1) CSI: = reference, but unstable HEA: Small or moderate Livelihood Protection Deficit Livelihood: Stressed strategies and assets Coping Strategies: ‘insurance strategies’ Presence of mildly acutely malnourished child and/or mother in households Phase 3 Crisis Even with any current or projected humanitarian assistance: · HH group has significant food consumption gaps with high or above usual acute malnutrition; OR · HH group is marginally able to meet minimum food needs only with irreversible coping strategies such as liquidating livelihood assets or diverting expenses from essential nonfood items. Quantity: significant gap OR 2,100 kcal pp/day via asset stripping HDDS: severe deterioration of HDDS (loss of 2 food groups from typical based on 12 food groups) FCS: borderline consumption HHS: moderate ( 2-3) CSI: > reference and increasing HEA: Substantial Livelihood Protection deficit OR small Survival Deficit 20% but 50% Livelihood: Near Complete Collapse of strategies and assets Coping: effectively no ability to cope Presence of several severely acutely malnourished people in households Unchanged Unchanged Marginal increase; unstable Significant increase Death due to starvation is evident in hhs Adequate and short term stable Water: marginally ≥15 liters pppd; stable None or minimal effects of hazards and vulnerability causing short-term instability Stressed, borderline adequate, and short-term unstable Water: marginally ≥15 liters pppd; unstable Effects of hazards and vulnerability causing shortterm instability and stressing livelihoods and food consumption Inadequate and short-term unstable Extremely inadequate and shortterm unstable Effectively no availability, access, and utilization. Volatile. Water: 7.5 to 15 liters pppd Water: 4 to 7.5 liters pppd Water:
Page 1 and 2:
Technical Partners Swiss Agency for
Page 3 and 4:
Acknowledgement FSNAU would like to
Page 5 and 6:
5.11.4 Livestock Herd Dynamics Juba
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 41: Trends in Terms of Trade
Page 9 and 10:
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 KEY FINDIN
Page 11 and 12:
Table 3: Distribution of Rural and
Page 13 and 14:
Map 2: Somalia Acute Food Insecurit
Page 15 and 16:
over the last 12 months. However, l
Page 17 and 18:
and 4) was estimated at 100,000 (5,
Page 19 and 20:
security situation of the poor past
Page 21 and 22:
Table 4: Overview of Gu 2012 Assess
Page 23 and 24:
Adoption of IPC Technical Manual Ve
Page 25 and 26:
Figure 1: Time-series data of NDVI/
Page 27 and 28:
3.2 civil insecurity EVENTS Civil i
Page 29:
3.3 agriculture Area Cultivated und
Page 32 and 33:
Sectors 24 Local cereal prices (mai
Page 34 and 35:
Sectors 26 3.4 livestocK sector Bac
Page 36 and 37:
Sectors 28 Livestock Trade and Pric
Page 38 and 39:
Sectors 30 3.5 marKets and trade Ex
Page 40 and 41: Sectors 32 3.6 nutrition situation
Page 42 and 43: Urban Analysis 34 Evolution of food
Page 44 and 45: Urban Analysis 36 4. intEGrAtEd foo
Page 46 and 47: Urban Analysis 38 Social Capital So
Page 48 and 49: IDP Analysis 40 Given the security
Page 50 and 51: IDP Analysis 42 Figure 23: Sources
Page 52 and 53: Regional Analysis 44 4.3 SOMALIA’
Page 54 and 55: Regional Analysis 46 decreased by 2
Page 56 and 57: Regional Analysis 48 4.3.2 LOwER AN
Page 58 and 59: Regional Analysis 50 Average cattle
Page 60 and 61: Regional Analysis 52 4.3.3 BAY AND
Page 62 and 63: Regional Analysis 54 facilities cla
Page 64 and 65: Regional Analysis 56 4.3.4 LOwER AN
Page 66 and 67: Regional Analysis 58 The population
Page 68 and 69: Regional Analysis 60 4.3.5 hIRAN RE
Page 70 and 71: Regional Analysis 62 in addition to
Page 72 and 73: Regional Analysis 64 4.3.6 CENTRAL
Page 74 and 75: Regional Analysis 66 These househol
Page 76 and 77: Regional Analysis 68 4.3.7 NORThEAS
Page 78 and 79: Regional Analysis 70 Physical Capit
Page 80 and 81: Regional Analysis 72 4.3.8 NORThwES
Page 82 and 83: Regional Analysis 74 Table 31: Nort
Page 84 and 85: Regional Regional Analysis 76 Avera
Page 87 and 88: Among the Mogadishu IDP women, food
Page 89: 5. Appendices 5.1.1 BAcKGROUnd And
Page 93 and 94: Appendices 85 5.2.1 Time-Series of
Page 95 and 96: 5.2.2 Time-Series of the Integrated
Page 97 and 98: 5.3.2 Progression of Rural Humanita
Page 99 and 100: 5.3.4 progression of Rural Humanita
Page 101 and 102: 5.3.6 progression of Rural Humanita
Page 103 and 104: 5.3.8 progression of the Rural Huma
Page 105 and 106: 5.3.9 Progression of Rural Humanita
Page 107 and 108: 5.3.10 Progression of Rural Humanit
Page 109 and 110: 5.4.2 estimated RURAL population in
Page 111 and 112: 5.4.3 estimated URBAn population in
Page 113 and 114: 5.4.4 estimated RURAL population in
Page 115 and 116: 5.6 LisT OF pARTneRs WHO pARTicipAT
Page 117 and 118: 5.7 post Gu ‘12 Food security sea
Page 119 and 120: 5.9 post Gu ‘12 IDP Matrix FCS -
Page 121 and 122: 5.10.3 Livestock Herd dynamics cent
Page 123 and 124: 8 9 What was the main reason for th
Page 125 and 126: 8.1 b. Cattle c. Sheep d. Goat e. p
Page 127 and 128: 5.12.3 Key informant/Focus Groups Q
Page 129 and 130: observed mostly? 6.7 What triggered
Page 131 and 132: Jan 2011- now a. Camels b. Cattle c
Page 133 and 134: 5.12.5 cereal Flow survey THe FOOd
Page 135 and 136: 9. Has there been any cereal outflo
Page 137 and 138: 2 2.3 What was the source of the se
Page 139 and 140: 4 4. 0 CROP CONDITION 4.1 What is t
Page 141 and 142:
5.12.7 Gu ‘12 season crop Assesme
Page 143 and 144:
4. FERTILIZER 4.1 a) Did the majori
Page 145 and 146:
6.5 What were the crop production c
Page 147 and 148:
5.12.8 idp Household survey Questio
Page 149 and 150:
3.5 Did your household receive any
Page 151 and 152:
Page 2 of 7 5.12.9 idp Assessment Q
Page 153 and 154:
4 LIVELIHOOD STRATEGIES 4.1 What we
Page 155 and 156:
school in the last three months wha
Page 157 and 158:
3.2 What was the source of income o
Page 159 and 160:
Page 1 of 1 5.12.11 Urban FGd south
Page 161 and 162:
5. Casual/labour wage (from portage
Page 163 and 164:
2.2. What was the source of income
Page 165 and 166:
Part 1: Analysis of Current Imminen
Page 167 and 168:
their dietary needs, and food prefe
Page 169 and 170:
Rapid assessment: undertaken follow
Page 171 and 172:
FSNAU Technical Series Report No. V
show all

Fsnau-Post-Gu-2012-Technical-Report

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?