01.01.2014 Views

Download PDF - Goodmans

Download PDF - Goodmans

Download PDF - Goodmans

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

insolvent insurer in the interest of not interfering with ongoing insurer<br />

rehabilitation.<br />

Serio v. Rhulen, 815 N.Y.S.2d 320 (App. Div. 2006). In the rehabilitator’s action<br />

against certain directors and officers of the insolvent insurer for breach of<br />

fiduciary duties and diversion of funds, the court ruled that the defendant had<br />

preserved his statutory right to priority of deposition, and the rehabilitator’s<br />

duties, protective statutory role as rehabilitator, and interest in proceeding in<br />

the action did not divest the defendant of priority of deposition. The defendant<br />

would be bound to use reasonable diligence in pursuing the rehabilitator’s<br />

deposition and the court retained broad discretion to issue protective orders.<br />

Superintendent of Insurance of State of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty<br />

Co., 401 F. Supp. 640 (D.C. N.Y. 1975). The insurance commissioner is entitled<br />

to all the rights of a private litigant in the federal district courts when seeking<br />

to enforce the claims of an insurance corporation in dissolution, and also has<br />

powers to compound or sell all uncollectible or doubtful claims owed the<br />

insolvent insurer, or to settle or discontinue those claims on terms which the<br />

commissioner considers proper.<br />

Van Schaick v. Stevens, 152 Misc. 163, 273 N.Y.S. 748 (1934). The court upheld<br />

an action brought by the insurance commissioner as rehabilitator against the<br />

directors of an insurance company, as in keeping with the statutory purpose of<br />

restoring the company to its prior condition, where the action brought was for<br />

an accounting as to the alleged wrongful acts and for repayment and<br />

restoration of assets to the company which had been diverted, wasted and<br />

misappropriated.<br />

Van Schaick v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 252 A.D. 188, 297 N.Y.S. 827 (1937).<br />

The insurance commissioner as a rehabilitator possesses the powers of a<br />

statutory receiver, and can prosecute actions on behalf of creditors.<br />

North Carolina Eastern Appraisal Services, Inc., v. State ex rel. Long, 118 N.C. App. 692, 457<br />

S.E.2d 312 (1995). The court held that actions of Insurance Commissioner as<br />

liquidator of insolvent insurer in obtaining temporary custody of claims files<br />

of private appraiser for insurer, for use by guaranty association in handling<br />

claims, did not constitute a “taking” of appraiser’s property, entitling<br />

appraiser to just compensation under Federal and State constitutions.<br />

Furthermore, the Court noted that under North Carolina law, Commissioner<br />

of Insurance assumes identity of an insolvent insurer when he becomes a<br />

receiver.<br />

Pink v. Henby, 220 N.C. 667, 18 S.E.2d 127 (1942). As the statutory liquidator of<br />

a surety company the New York insurance commissioner could sue in North<br />

Carolina to recover attorney's fees paid pursuant to an application for a tax<br />

abatement bond.<br />

State ex rel. Ingram v. All American Assurance Co., 34 N.C. App. 517, 239 S.E.2d<br />

474 (1977). The rehabilitation court has broad supervisory powers, and<br />

therefore can award fees to insolvent insurer's counsel of record for services<br />

rendered in insolvency proceeding, although statute does not specifically so<br />

allow. The insurance commissioner has both discretionary and ministerial<br />

powers under the statute.<br />

State of North Carolina, ex rel. Long v. Cooper, 14 F. Supp. 2d 767 (E.D.N.C.<br />

1996). North Carolina Commissioner of Insurance, as receiver of insolvent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!