01.01.2014 Views

Download PDF - Goodmans

Download PDF - Goodmans

Download PDF - Goodmans

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

legislative history of Chapter 15 instructs the U.S. bankruptcy court to look to the Model Law, its Guide to<br />

Enactment and other history as central to the legislative history to Chapter 15. 8<br />

Further, and of significant consequence, Chapter 15 impacts proceedings within the United States commenced<br />

not only under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and in the U.S. bankruptcy courts, but also cases commenced under<br />

other laws in other Federal, State and Local courts. If a non‐U.S. proceeding is a “foreign proceeding” as<br />

defined under Chapter 15 section 1502(4), no relief may be obtained in aid of that proceeding or the debtor it<br />

involves, other than relief in aid of collecting a debt owed to that debtor, from any court within the United<br />

States, federal or state or local, unless a Chapter 15 petition for recognition of the “foreign proceeding” first is<br />

filed with an appropriate U.S. federal bankruptcy court and that court enters an order granting recognition of<br />

the “foreign proceeding.” 11 U.S.C. § 1509. Once a Chapter 15 recognition order has been obtained from a U.S.<br />

bankruptcy court, all other courts within the United States are required to grant comity or cooperation to the<br />

representative of the “foreign proceeding” who seeks their assistance. 11 U.S.C. §1509(b)(3).<br />

b. Judicial Discretion Under Chapter 15<br />

Chapter 15 is intended to afford non‐U.S. proceedings swifter, less subjective, and more certain and predictable<br />

relief in the United States in aid of effectuation and implementation of the foreign proceeding. Accordingly, in<br />

contrast to what was viewed as broad subjective discretion permitted under former section 304, the<br />

bankruptcy court’s discretion in determining whether or not to grant Chapter 15 recognition is more severely<br />

constrained if certain specified predicate criteria are met. 11 U.S.C. §1517.<br />

Determining whether or not to grant recognition to a foreign proceeding is now intended to be a simple,<br />

expeditious examination by the U.S. bankruptcy court of certain predicate criteria ~ the eligibility of the<br />

foreign proceeding for assistance from U.S. courts, the credentials of the petitioning representative of that<br />

proceeding, and the sufficiency of the application for recognition of the foreign proceeding. Moreover, the<br />

U.S. court is required to act on a petition for recognition “at the earliest possible time.” 11 U.S.C. §1517(c). If the<br />

court determines that the predicate criteria for recognition have been met, the court may not abstain from<br />

hearing the case, even in the “interest of justice” or in the “interest of comity”. 28 U.S.C. §1334(c)(1). Under<br />

such circumstances, the court may only refuse to grant recognition where the court determines that granting<br />

recognition under the circumstances presented “would be manifestly contrary to the public policy of the<br />

United States.” 11 U.S.C. §1506.<br />

The U.S. court is not empowered by Chapter 15 or otherwise to impose U.S. law on non‐U.S. proceedings or to<br />

second‐guess, re‐visit or re‐adjudicate the foreign court’s orders and decisions.<br />

Indeed, Chapter 15 expressly instructs the court that “[i]n interpreting this chapter the court shall consider its<br />

international origin, and the need to promote an application of this chapter that is consistent with the application<br />

of similar statutes adopted by foreign jurisdictions.” 11 U.S.C. §1508. If the U.S. court finds the applicable foreign<br />

law to be anathema to the most fundamental U.S. public policy, the U.S. court is not empowered to change the<br />

foreign law. The U.S. court is only empowered to refuse to assist in the application of that foreign law. If the<br />

U.S. court finds that the foreign proceeding and/or foreign representative have not met the predicate criteria<br />

for recognition, the U.S. court is only empowered to refuse to assist the implementation of that foreign<br />

proceeding within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.<br />

c. Eligibility Basics for Chapter 15 Recognition and Relief<br />

To obtain relief from a U.S. bankruptcy court ancillary to and in aid of a non‐U.S. proceeding, certain predicate<br />

requirements first must be met:<br />

• The non‐U.S. proceeding must be Eligible for recognition under Chapter 15<br />

• The Petitioner must be Eligible to file the Ch. 15 case in aid of that proceeding<br />

• Commencement of the Chapter 15 case must be effected properly<br />

8 House Report at 107.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!