01.01.2014 Views

Download PDF - Goodmans

Download PDF - Goodmans

Download PDF - Goodmans

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

State ex rel. Cincinnati Life Assn's Assignee v. Matthews, 64 Ohio St. 419, 60<br />

N.E. 605 (1901). Securities required to have been deposited with the insurance<br />

commissioner by an insurance company are to be held in trust for the benefit<br />

and protection of, and as security for, the policyholders of such company, so<br />

that the assignee of such company cannot recover the securities from the<br />

commissioner without first showing that such company is no longer liable to<br />

any of its policyholders.<br />

State ex rel. Safeguard Ins. Co. v. Vorys, 171 Ohio St. 109, 167 N.E. 2d 910 (1960).<br />

Where Ohio insurer filed with the Ohio superintendent of Insurance a<br />

certificate and deposit for the benefit of all its policyholders, and where Ohio<br />

Superintendent of Insurance found that such corporation was not and was not<br />

likely to become insolvent, Superintendent had duty to deliver to the<br />

corporation the deposit which had been made to him by the insurer which had<br />

now been merged into a foreign corporation.<br />

State ex rel. Turner v. Union Casualty Ins. Co., 8 Ohio App. 285, 29 O.C.D. 491<br />

(1917). Under the insurance code in Ohio, a deposit made by a foreign<br />

insurance company with the insurance commissioner, as a prerequisite to<br />

doing business in Ohio, should, on insolvency of insurance company, be<br />

administered by the Ohio insurance commissioner under direction of court,<br />

and should be described directly to policyholders entitled to share therein, and<br />

should not be turned over to domiciliary receiver of company.<br />

Oregon State ex rel. Driscoll v. Early American Insurance Corp., 84 Or. App. 252, 733<br />

P.2d 919 (1987). Oregon ancillary receiver of Alabama insurer was allowed to<br />

keep $30,000 insurance deposit for surety insurance to extent necessary to<br />

settle claims against such insurer arising out of its other insurance business in<br />

Oregon, with any excess to go to the domiciliary receiver.<br />

Rhode Island Langdeau v. Narragansett Ins. Co., 94 R.I. 128, 179 A.2d 110, affirmed, 95 R.I. 4,<br />

182 A.2d 322 (1962). The legislature enacted the Uniform Insurers Liquidation<br />

Act knowing its prior enactments which required foreign insurers to deposit<br />

trust funds with Rhode Island's general treasurer and to give up the trust fund<br />

only after following specific procedures, including publication notice for six<br />

months. It was found that the prior provisions were undisturbed by the<br />

Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act and thus the prior laws were held to apply to<br />

liquidate insurance companies.<br />

South Carolina Clark v. Preferred Accident Ins. Co. of New York, 231 S.C. 167, 97 S.E.2d 498<br />

(1957). The New York statutory liquidator of an insolvent surety company<br />

sought to withdraw bonds held in South Carolina subject to a statutory deposit<br />

requirement. No surety claims were pending in South Carolina. It was held<br />

that the statutory deposit could be retained by South Carolina as an "other<br />

asset" of the corporation for the protection of South Carolina policyholders<br />

who were not surety creditors.<br />

Wise v. Carolina Hail Ins. Co., 108 S.C. 504, 94 S.E. 535 (1918). It was held that<br />

under Sections 2701 and 2708 of the Civil Code of 1912, an insurer's statutory<br />

deposit held by the insurance commissioner was subject to claims of<br />

policyholders before claims of creditors.<br />

Texas<br />

Virginia<br />

Op. Att'y. Gen. WW‐497 (Tex. 1958). A general court order placing an insurance<br />

company in receivership is sufficient authority for the State Treasurer to<br />

release securities deposited with the Treasurer.<br />

Andrews v. Cahoon, 196 Va. 790, 86 S.E.2d 173 (1955). A Virginia resident with<br />

claim against insolvent New York insurer could proceed to enforce a lien<br />

against the insurer's statutory deposit in Virginia, although the resident had

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!