01.01.2014 Views

Download PDF - Goodmans

Download PDF - Goodmans

Download PDF - Goodmans

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case Law Digest Supplement<br />

PROPERTY & CASUALTY GUARANTY FUNDS<br />

Purpose & Construction of Guaranty Association Laws<br />

Purpose & Construction of Guaranty Association Laws – In General<br />

Nebraska Nebraska Life & Health Ins. Ass’n v. Dobias, 247 Neb. 900, 531 N.W.2d 217 (1995).<br />

Provisions of Act requiring a liberal construction “does not grant us a license to<br />

add words . . . .”<br />

Ohio Lake Hospital Systems v. Ohio Ins. Guar. Ass’n, 69 Ohio St. 3d 521, 634 N.E.2d 611<br />

(1994). “There is no need to liberally construe a statute whose meaning is<br />

unequivocal and definite.”<br />

Direct Insurance<br />

Line of Business<br />

Florida Zinke‐Smith v. Florida Ins. Guar. Ass’n, 304 So.2d 507 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974).<br />

The insured qualified as a self‐insured, but had a policy with a large deductible.<br />

The court held the policy was not reinsurance, but direct insurance analogous to<br />

collision coverage with a deductible.<br />

Oklahoma<br />

Pennsylvania<br />

South Carolina<br />

Wichita National Life Ins. Co. v. State of Oklahoma, Unpublished (Ok. Civ. App.<br />

1991). Amounts due under a reinsurance contract from an insolvent insurer are<br />

not covered.<br />

Garcia v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan, 455 Pa.<br />

Super. 360, 688 A.2d 209 (1997). 15 USC 3901, et seq., specifically excludes<br />

policies issued by Risk Retention Groups from coverage under the Model Act.<br />

South Carolina Prop. & Cas. Ins. Guar. Ass’n v. Carolinas Roofing & Sheet Metal<br />

Contractors Self‐Ins. Fund, 315 S.C. 555, 446 S.E.2d 422 (1994). The insured had a<br />

policy with a large deductible and the court held the arrangement was one of<br />

reinsurance and not direct insurance.<br />

Excluded Lines – Health<br />

Alabama Alabama Ins. Guar. Ass’n v. Stephenson, 514 So.2d 1000 (Ala. 1987). The<br />

Association was denied credit for payments made by a health insurer because<br />

the statute excluded health insurance from coverage.<br />

Indiana<br />

Indiana Ins. Guar. Ass’n v. Davis, 768 N.E.2d 902 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). Under<br />

Indiana Code § 27‐6‐8‐11’s non‐duplication of recovery provisions, the calculation<br />

of “amount payable” does not take into account types of direct insurance<br />

excluded under § 27‐6‐8‐4. Accordingly, the Associations’ obligations may not<br />

be reduced by paid health insurance benefits because such insurance is<br />

expressly excluded under § 27‐6‐8‐4.<br />

Excluded Lines – Mortgage Guaranty<br />

Louisiana<br />

Commercial National Bank in Shreveport v. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass’n, 19th<br />

Judicial Dist., Parish of East Baton Rouge, La. (1993). The court held the<br />

Association liable for return premiums on policies covering loan payments,<br />

stating that the policies were not mortgage guaranty, an excluded line, but<br />

were for credit life.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!