01.01.2014 Views

Download PDF - Goodmans

Download PDF - Goodmans

Download PDF - Goodmans

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Part III of the Winding‐up and Restructuring Act sets out specific priority distribution schemes for insurance<br />

companies and Canadian branches of foreign insurance companies. 11 In general terms, the order of priorities<br />

is: (i) costs of the liquidation, (ii) eligible employee wages, (iii) claims under insurance policies (including<br />

reinsurance obligations), (iii) ordinary creditor claims, and (iv) post‐liquidation interest. The Winding‐up and<br />

Restructuring Act also allows for the transfer of the assets of the Canadian branch to the liquidator of the non‐<br />

Canadian company, but only with the approval of the federal Superintendent of Financial Institutions.<br />

3. Special Provisions for Winding‐up of Canadian Insurance Companies with Non‐<br />

Canadian Branches<br />

Some Canadian insurance companies carry on business in a non‐Canadian jurisdiction though an<br />

unincorporated branch, which is subject to the regulation of the non‐Canadian jurisdiction (e.g., a ‘port‐ofentry’<br />

state of the United States of America). Typically, the Canadian insurance company will have been<br />

required to deposit assets in the non‐Canadian jurisdiction for the protection of the policyholders and creditors<br />

of the non‐Canadian branch business. Where a Canadian insurance company is ordered to be wound‐up, the<br />

Winding‐up and Restructuring Act requires the Canadian liquidator to take possession or control of all the<br />

company’s assets and distribute them, without drawing any distinction between assets and liabilities within<br />

Canada and those outside Canada. 12 The Act does not distinguish between policyholders and creditors inside<br />

Canada and those outside Canada for the purpose of distributions of the assets in an insolvency. A liquidator<br />

of a Canadian insurance company is therefore required, in the first instance, to carry out its duties for the<br />

benefit of all policyholders and creditors of the company, regardless of their residence or jurisdiction.<br />

However, where a court‐appointed officer in the non‐Canadian branch jurisdiction exercises control over the<br />

assets of the non‐Canadian branch, and does not have a duty to claimants outside that jurisdiction (e.g., those<br />

in Canada), the Winding‐up and Restructuring Act provides a mechanism for the Canadian liquidator to<br />

effectively put the non‐Canadian court officer to an election. 13 If the mechanism is triggered, the non‐Canadian<br />

officer must elect to either (i) transfer the assets in the non‐Canadian branch jurisdiction to the Canadian<br />

liquidator (thereby entitling the non‐Canadian branch policyholders and creditors to participate fully in the<br />

liquidation in Canada), or (ii) to retain the non‐Canadian branch assets, thereby triggering a deemed forfeiture<br />

by the policyholders of the non‐Canadian jurisdiction of any claim to share in the assets in the Canadian estate.<br />

4. Case Law Digest<br />

a. Cross‐border Aspects of the Liquidation of Canadian Insurance Companies<br />

and Canadian Branches of Foreign Insurance Companies<br />

i. Jurisdiction of the Canadian Court<br />

Canada (Attorney‐General) v. Reliance Insurance Company, [2008] O.J. No. 795<br />

(Ontario Superior Court – Commercial List); leave to appeal refused [January 25,<br />

2008 – Ontario Court of Appeal No. M35682]. Once a winding‐up order has<br />

been made, including in respect of a Canadian branch of a foreign insurance<br />

company, the proceedings are governed by the Winding‐up and Restructuring<br />

Act.<br />

Canada (Attorney‐General) v. Reliance Insurance Company, [2008] O.J. No. 795<br />

(Ontario Superior Court – Commercial List); leave to appeal refused [January 25,<br />

2008 – Ontario Court of Appeal No. M35682]. The jurisdiction of the Canadian<br />

court is not defeated because a liquidation order has already been made in the<br />

company’s country of origin. The Canadian court then administers the assets of<br />

the company that are within its jurisdiction.<br />

Kansa General International Insurance Co. (liquidator of) v. Maska U.S. Inc.,<br />

[1998] Q.J. No. 1410 (Quebec Court of Appeal). Whatever assets a foreign<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

Winding‐up and Restructuring Act, Part III<br />

Winding‐up and Restructuring Act, section 33.<br />

Winding‐up and Restructuring Act, section 164.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!