04.06.2014 Views

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Theunis Roux 85<br />

The next part of the Final Constitution that needs to be taken into<br />

account are the provisions setting out the powers and functions of the<br />

various legislative bodies. These provisions may be divided into three<br />

basic types: provisions requiring legislative bodies to take account of<br />

representative and participatory democracy in the way they design<br />

their rules and orders; provisions requiring legislative bodies to allow<br />

minority party participation in their proceedings; and provisions<br />

requiring legislative bodies to facilitate public access to and<br />

involvement in their proceedings. All these provisions qualify the<br />

majority-rule principle underlying the provisions on national,<br />

provincial and local government legislative authority as a whole: that<br />

is, the principle that whichever party wins the most votes in an<br />

election is entitled to form the government. The qualification that<br />

the three sets of provisions place on the majority-rule principle is that<br />

the commitment to multi-party democracy in FC section 1(d) is not<br />

one that may be fulfilled at election-time alone, but one that must be<br />

carried through to the day-to-day operation of the various<br />

legislatures, such that the views of citizens who voted for minority<br />

parties are fairly reflected in any discussions that take place. In<br />

addition, the third type of provision requires that the legislatures<br />

should allow citizens on occasion to bypass their elected representatives<br />

in order to participate directly in the proceedings of the<br />

legislature. This qualification may be expressed by restating the first<br />

element of the democratic principle in the following way:<br />

Government in South Africa must be so arranged that the people,<br />

through the medium of political parties and regular elections, in which<br />

all adult citizens are entitled to participate, exert sufficient control over<br />

their elected representatives to ensure that (a) representatives are held<br />

to account for their actions, (b) government listens and responds to the<br />

needs of the people, in appropriate cases directly, [and] (c) collective<br />

decisions are taken by majority vote after due consideration of the views<br />

of minority parties, and (d) the reasons for all collective decisions are<br />

publicly explained. (Words added are underlined; words deleted appear<br />

in square brackets.)<br />

Is it also necessary to amend the statement of the democratic<br />

principle in light of other rights integral to democracy, such as the<br />

right to freedom of expression, political rights and socio-economic<br />

rights? To a large extent, these rights have already been taken into<br />

account in the statement of the second element of the democratic<br />

principle. At the risk of privileging certain rights over others and<br />

making the statement of the second element long and unwieldy, one<br />

might amend it thus:<br />

The rights necessary to maintain such a form of government, including<br />

the right to freedom of expression, the right to form political parties,<br />

the right to vote, and the right to the minimum standard of welfare<br />

necessary to participate in the democratic process, must be enshrined in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!