04.06.2014 Views

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cathi Albertyn & Beth Goldblatt 233<br />

(social equality). It confirms a strong relationship between<br />

substantive equality and the achievement of socio-economic rights. 3<br />

The value of substantive equality does not provide a definitive<br />

answer to the question, ‘equality of what?’ However, it does suggest<br />

that the constitutional answer is, at least, a social democratic vision<br />

that entails equality of opportunities and outcomes, including the<br />

idea of redistribution (of power and resources) and the remedying of<br />

material disadvantage. Here the aspirational value of achieving<br />

equality is capable of an expansive meaning: It is largely unencumbered<br />

by more practical considerations of the separation of<br />

powers and institutional competence. However, constitutional rights,<br />

as legal entitlements, are enforced through the courts and it is in FC<br />

section 9, discussed below, that the idea of substantive equality is<br />

captured in law.<br />

2.2 The values underlying the equality right<br />

As with any other right, the equality right should be interpreted in the<br />

light of underlying constitutional values, as well as the interests —<br />

that that right is meant to protect. This interrogation of purpose and<br />

values provides the equality right with its substantive content, and<br />

provides an answer to the question: ‘equality of what?’ The judicial<br />

determination of values and purpose thus involves choices about<br />

whom or what the right can and should protect. In the equality right,<br />

<strong>this</strong> determination mostly takes place in terms of an assessment of<br />

fairness. In <strong>this</strong> assessment, dignity has been the dominant and<br />

determinative value.<br />

2.2.1 Dignity<br />

The Constitutional Court emphasised the relationship between<br />

equality and the value of dignity early in its jurisprudential<br />

development of the right. In President of the Republic of South Africa<br />

v Hugo Goldstone J said:<br />

At the heart of the prohibition of unfair discrimination lies a recognition<br />

that the purpose of our new constitutional and democratic order is the<br />

establishment of a society in which all human beings will be accorded<br />

equal dignity and respect regardless of their membership of particular<br />

groups. The achievement of such a society in the context of our deeply<br />

3 For a discussion on the relationship between equality and socio-economic rights<br />

see B Goldblatt & S Liebenberg ‘Achieving substantive equality in South Africa:<br />

The relationship between equality and socio-economic rights’ (2007) 23 South<br />

African Journal on Human Rights 335.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!