Download this publication - PULP

14
15
16
17
TOWARDS A SUBSTANTIVE RIGHT TO EQUALITY 231
Cathi Albertyn & Beth Goldblatt
1 Introduction
2 Values and the equality right
2.1 Equality as substantive equality
2.2 The values underlying the equality right
2.2.1 Dignity
2.2.2 Equality
2.2.3 Values, purposes and the parameters of the
equality right
3 Evaluation of unfair discrimination jurisprudence
3.1 Proving discrimination in the first step of the Harksen
test
3.2 Grounds of discrimination
3.2.1 Race
3.2.2 Sexual orientation
3.2.3 Sex/gender
3.3 Unlisted/new grounds of discrimination
3.3.1 Citizenship
3.3.2 The poor
3.3.3 Intersectionality
3.4 The application of contextual approach
4 An overview of the right and its relationship with
FC section 36
4.1 FC section 9(1) (rationality)
4.2 FC section 9(2) (a defence to unfair discrimination)
4.3 FC section 9(3) (fairness) and FC section 36
4.4 Can unfairness be justified?
REPLY 255
A cautionary note regarding substantive equality:
A reply to Cathi Albertyn & Beth Goldblatt
Karthy Govender
1 Caution with respect to expansive approaches
to equality
2 Concerns about equality
2.1 Van Heerden — a flexible approach
2.2 Van Heerden — a positive obligation
3 FC section 9 fairness and FC section 36
justification
3.1 Minister of Education v Harris
3.2 Volks v Robinson
4 Conclusion
THE ‘ARBITRARY DEPRIVATION’ VORTEX: 265
CONSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY LAW AFTER FNB
Theunis Roux
1 Introduction
2 Six points
3 FNB
4 The vortex
REPLY 283
Against regulatory taking: In defence of the
two-stage inquiry: A reply to Theunis Roux
Frank Michelman
1 Introduction
2 The FNB vortex: A cause for concern?
3 Making sense of FC section 25(1)’s internal and
external limitations
viii