04.06.2014 Views

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cathi Albertyn & Beth Goldblatt 249<br />

refugees took account of a wider range of contextual issues than did<br />

the majority and reflects a deeper understanding of vulnerability.<br />

In Jordan, the majority failed to appreciate the gendered nature<br />

of the sex work industry and chose to focus formalistically on the fact<br />

that the male customer and the female sex worker (as well as both<br />

male and female sex workers) were equally criminalised by the<br />

challenged legislation. The minority (the Court was divided 6:5)<br />

interpreted the Act to mean that sex workers faced greater sanctions<br />

as the primary offender than did their clients as accomplices and that<br />

since sex workers were generally women and clients men, indirect<br />

discrimination had occurred. The minority was thus able to see <strong>this</strong><br />

distinction as ‘mattering’ by exploring and unpacking the perception<br />

of sex workers as social outcasts, deviants and temptresses. 128<br />

Volks concerned a claim by a surviving domestic partner to<br />

maintenance in terms of the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act.<br />

The majority had little sympathy for the middle class complainant —<br />

although it acknowledged the vulnerability of a group of poor women<br />

who find themselves in unregulated domestic partnerships. Although<br />

there was a seeming attention to context, the judgment foundered on<br />

its inability to look at the matter historically. The focus on the special<br />

place of marriage blocked any willingness to shift dominant<br />

traditional and conservative ideas about the nature of the family.<br />

Moreover, the focus on a person’s choice to marry or not was at odds<br />

with an understanding of constraints on women’s choices within<br />

intimate relationships, particularly when they are already<br />

disadvantaged and poor. 129<br />

4 An overview of the right and its relationship with FC<br />

section 36<br />

The equality right in FC section 9 is quite detailed. Five provisions set<br />

out different aspects of the right, and different ‘levels’ of equality<br />

protection (what the US courts call scrutiny). The Constitutional Court<br />

has argued that ‘[a] comprehensive understanding of the<br />

Constitution’s conception of equality requires a harmonious reading<br />

of the provisions of section 9’. 130 This reading also requires the right<br />

to be approached holistically rather than formulaically, so that the<br />

right, as a whole, produces an approach to achieving equality which<br />

is ‘cumulative, interrelated and indivisible’. 131<br />

128<br />

Jordan (n 12 above) para 64.<br />

129 See also Albertyn (n 93 above) 229-30; C Lind ‘Domestic Partnerships and Marital<br />

Status Discrimination’ in Murray & O’Sullivan (n 1 above) 108-130.<br />

130<br />

Van Heerden (n 31 above) para 28.<br />

131 Van Heerden (n 31 above) para 135 (Sachs J).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!