Download this publication - PULP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Reply - Iain Currie 147 revisited and replaced with something more theoretically sound. Stu clearly thinks the two forms are different and that the direct/indirect distinction makes a difference. But I could not immediately find in the text a convincing explanation of why (but it is, as I may have mentioned, a lengthy text and I have to confess that I have postponed reading that famous Appendix until my next sabbatical). So <strong>this</strong> is my opportunity to ask him in person and is the point of these remarks. Is direct horizontality necessary? Is there any reason other than the beauty of our theories to bother with it?
Page 1 and 2:
This collection of colloquies flows
Page 3 and 4:
Constitutional conversations Publis
Page 5 and 6:
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 THE WIDENIN
Page 7 and 8:
6 7 8 9 10 2 A supreme, pervasive a
Page 9 and 10:
14 15 16 17 TOWARDS A SUBSTANTIVE R
Page 11 and 12:
FOREWORD The respective enactment a
Page 13 and 14:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The publishers and
Page 16 and 17:
1 INTRODUCTION: LAW’S AUTONOMY St
Page 18 and 19:
Stu Woolman & Michael Bishop 3 enti
Page 20 and 21:
Stu Woolman & Michael Bishop 5 inte
Page 22 and 23:
Stu Woolman & Michael Bishop 7 undo
Page 24 and 25:
Stu Woolman & Michael Bishop 9 forc
Page 26 and 27:
Stu Woolman & Michael Bishop 11 con
Page 28 and 29:
Stu Woolman & Michael Bishop 13 pro
Page 30 and 31:
Stu Woolman & Michael Bishop 15 ‘
Page 32 and 33:
Stu Woolman & Michael Bishop 17 all
Page 34 and 35:
Stu Woolman & Michael Bishop 19 to
Page 36 and 37:
Stu Woolman & Michael Bishop 21 dra
Page 38 and 39:
Stu Woolman & Michael Bishop 23 ‘
Page 40 and 41:
2 THE SOUTH AFRICAN CONSTITUTION AS
Page 42 and 43:
Stu Woolman 27 the law — to the f
Page 44 and 45:
Stu Woolman 29 not really read what
Page 46 and 47:
Stu Woolman 31 3 The South African
Page 48 and 49:
Stu Woolman 33 Van der Walt’s obs
Page 50:
Stu Woolman 35 Many, but by no mean
Page 53 and 54:
38 Chapter 3 fondly as an enlighten
Page 55 and 56:
40 Chapter 3 This brings me to my n
Page 57 and 58:
42 Chapter 3 The one spark of acade
Page 60 and 61:
4 CONSTITUTIONAL SUPREMACY AND APPE
Page 62 and 63:
Frank I Michelman 47 confined to
Page 64 and 65:
Frank I Michelman 49 an illusion.
Page 66 and 67:
Frank I Michelman 51 ‘There is on
Page 68 and 69:
Frank I Michelman 53 Court.’ 15 (
Page 70 and 71:
Frank I Michelman 55 and the wisdom
Page 72 and 73:
Frank I Michelman 57 up appropriate
Page 74 and 75:
Frank I Michelman 59 protections fo
Page 76:
Frank I Michelman 61 conditions bei
Page 79 and 80:
64 Chapter 5 Thank you too for the
Page 81 and 82:
66 Chapter 5 It seems to me that th
Page 83 and 84:
68 Chapter 5 individuals and corpor
Page 85 and 86:
70 Chapter 5 rights. It made clear
Page 87 and 88:
72 Chapter 5 Were the Constitution
Page 89 and 90:
74 Chapter 5 only a decade of decis
Page 91 and 92:
76 Chapter 5 law or the constitutio
Page 93 and 94:
78 Chapter 5 a legal norm has been
Page 95 and 96:
80 Chapter 6 essay as a whole, the
Page 97 and 98:
82 Chapter 6 that are integral to d
Page 99 and 100:
84 Chapter 6 to serve are ‘human
Page 101 and 102:
86 Chapter 6 a supreme-law Bill of
Page 103 and 104:
88 Chapter 6 Another case in which
Page 105 and 106:
90 Chapter 6 The Constitutional Cou
Page 107 and 108:
92 Chapter 6 O’Regan J’s statem
Page 109 and 110:
94 Chapter 6 operating as a guide t
Page 111 and 112: 96 Chapter 6 and O’Regan J certai
Page 113 and 114: 98 Chapter 7 example of the kind of
Page 115 and 116: 100 Chapter 7 democracy with the in
Page 117 and 118: 102 Chapter 7 Of course, throughout
Page 119 and 120: 104 Chapter 7 rights and democracy
Page 121 and 122: 106 Chapter 7 question raised in th
Page 123 and 124: 108 Chapter 7 the depoliticising fi
Page 125 and 126: 110 Chapter 7 constitutional text a
Page 128 and 129: 8 TRUE IN THEORY, TRUE IN PRACTICE:
Page 130 and 131: Stu Woolman 115 My subsequent appro
Page 132 and 133: Stu Woolman 117 subject to direct r
Page 134 and 135: Stu Woolman 119 section 8(1) states
Page 136 and 137: Stu Woolman 121 In Du Plessis, the
Page 138 and 139: Stu Woolman 123 constitutional norm
Page 140 and 141: Stu Woolman 125 indirect applicatio
Page 142 and 143: Stu Woolman 127 value-driven exerci
Page 144 and 145: Stu Woolman 129 tage’ and ‘the
Page 146 and 147: Stu Woolman 131 that they do not sp
Page 148 and 149: Stu Woolman 133 and every exercise
Page 150 and 151: Stu Woolman 135 justification that
Page 152 and 153: Stu Woolman 137 Incompletely theori
Page 154 and 155: 9 Reply Summarising Proust: A reply
Page 156 and 157: Reply - Iain Currie 141 fuss about
Page 158 and 159: Reply - Iain Currie 143 section 39(
Page 160 and 161: Reply - Iain Currie 145 39(2): When
Page 164 and 165: 10 LIMITATIONS: SHARED CONSTITUTION
Page 166 and 167: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 151 consis
Page 168 and 169: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 153 2 Deli
Page 170 and 171: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 155 if the
Page 172 and 173: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 157 outwei
Page 174 and 175: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 159 distri
Page 176 and 177: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 161 3.4 In
Page 178 and 179: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 163 about
Page 180 and 181: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 165 alter
Page 182 and 183: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 167 legal
Page 184 and 185: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 169 justif
Page 186 and 187: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 171 5.2 Di
Page 188 and 189: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 173 value
Page 190 and 191: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 175 the mo
Page 192 and 193: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 177 Rights
Page 194 and 195: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 179 Third,
Page 196 and 197: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 181 but in
Page 198 and 199: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 183 5.4 Ju
Page 200 and 201: Stu Woolman & Henk Botha 185 prosti
Page 202 and 203: 11 Reply Sharing interpretation: A
Page 204 and 205: Reply - Johan van der Walt 189 pass
Page 206: Reply - Johan van der Walt 191 exis
Page 209 and 210: 194 Chapter 12 1 Introduction Late
Page 211 and 212: 196 Chapter 12 found ability to rec
Page 213 and 214:
198 Chapter 12 3.1 Dignity 1: Indiv
Page 215 and 216:
200 Chapter 12 How then to understa
Page 217 and 218:
202 Chapter 12 individual’s human
Page 219 and 220:
204 Chapter 12 whole is demeaned wh
Page 221 and 222:
206 Chapter 12 The ability to give
Page 223 and 224:
208 Chapter 12 4.2 Dignity as a sec
Page 225 and 226:
210 Chapter 12 The values enunciate
Page 227 and 228:
212 Chapter 12 Succession of the So
Page 229 and 230:
214 Chapter 12 the Constitutional C
Page 231 and 232:
216 Chapter 12 freedom of our fello
Page 233 and 234:
218 Chapter 13 For someone, like my
Page 235 and 236:
220 Chapter 13 [t]his is not atheis
Page 237 and 238:
222 Chapter 13 It is generally unco
Page 239 and 240:
224 Chapter 13 a case-by-case appro
Page 241 and 242:
226 Chapter 13 but freedom to enabl
Page 243 and 244:
228 Chapter 13 tinuous legal fractu
Page 245 and 246:
230 Chapter 13 paragraph. 36 This s
Page 247 and 248:
232 Chapter 14 2 Values and the equ
Page 249 and 250:
234 Chapter 14 inegalitarian past w
Page 251 and 252:
236 Chapter 14 social exclusion, 17
Page 253 and 254:
238 Chapter 14 institutionalised un
Page 255 and 256:
240 Chapter 14 interpretation of th
Page 257 and 258:
242 Chapter 14 Odam, 72 Khosa, 73 a
Page 259 and 260:
244 Chapter 14 Following Fourie, Pa
Page 261 and 262:
246 Chapter 14 These decisions poin
Page 263 and 264:
248 Chapter 14 one can succeed on o
Page 265 and 266:
250 Chapter 14 4.1 FC section 9(1)
Page 267 and 268:
252 Chapter 14 However, the judgmen
Page 269 and 270:
254 Chapter 14 increase had been bu
Page 271 and 272:
256 Chapter 15 unjustifiably infrin
Page 273 and 274:
258 Chapter 15 Interestingly, Justi
Page 275 and 276:
260 Chapter 15 2.2 Van Heerden —
Page 277 and 278:
262 Chapter 15 clause enquiry, the
Page 280 and 281:
16 THE ‘ARBITRARY DEPRIVATION’
Page 282 and 283:
Theunis Roux 267 The second opportu
Page 284 and 285:
Theunis Roux 269 guaranteed in FC s
Page 286 and 287:
Theunis Roux 271 proceeds in three
Page 288 and 289:
Theunis Roux 273 (f) Generally spea
Page 290 and 291:
Theunis Roux 275 rationality and fu
Page 292 and 293:
Theunis Roux 277 the sorts of gover
Page 294 and 295:
Theunis Roux 279 expropriation of p
Page 296:
Theunis Roux 281 property clause in
Page 299 and 300:
284 Chapter 17 deprivations). Roux
Page 301 and 302:
286 Chapter 17 to applaud them. Whe
Page 303 and 304:
288 Chapter 17 make provision for d
Page 305 and 306:
290 Chapter 17 Can this effect poss
Page 307 and 308:
292 Chapter 17 bear without compens
Page 309 and 310:
294 Chapter 17 or sustain a regulat
Page 311 and 312:
296 Chapter 17 expropriation may se
Page 313 and 314:
298 Chapter 17 According to a readi
Page 315 and 316:
300 Chapter 17 laws from constituti
Page 317 and 318:
302 Chapter 17 The most obvious gai
Page 319 and 320:
304 Chapter 18 relevant rights. 5 T
Page 321 and 322:
306 Chapter 18 However, in practica
Page 323 and 324:
308 Chapter 18 It is fundamental to
Page 325 and 326:
310 Chapter 18 essential levels of
Page 327 and 328:
312 Chapter 18 should be prioritise
Page 329 and 330:
314 Chapter 18 can support a kind o
Page 331 and 332:
316 Chapter 18 which implicate mini
Page 333 and 334:
318 Chapter 18 development programm
Page 335 and 336:
320 Chapter 18 requirement that all
Page 337 and 338:
322 Chapter 18 In Grootboom, the Co
Page 339 and 340:
324 Chapter 18 Charter. Thus in the
Page 341 and 342:
326 Chapter 18 corresponding to the
Page 343 and 344:
328 Chapter 18 economic right, and
Page 346 and 347:
19 Reply On ‘dialogue’, ‘tran
Page 348 and 349:
Reply - Marius Pieterse 333 economi
Page 350 and 351:
Reply - Marius Pieterse 335 cost to
Page 352 and 353:
Reply - Marius Pieterse 337 individ
Page 354 and 355:
Reply - Marius Pieterse 339 3 Minim
Page 356 and 357:
Reply - Marius Pieterse 341 In any
Page 358 and 359:
Reply - Marius Pieterse 343 to indi
Page 360 and 361:
Reply - Marius Pieterse 345 for uph
Page 362:
Reply - Marius Pieterse 347 with an
show all

Download this publication - PULP

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?