Multimodal Semiotics and Collaborative Design

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Reinhard, C. D., & Dervin, B. (2010). Situations of media engagings: Comparing the new and the old through sense-making. Paper presented at 11th Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR): Internet Research 11.0 Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden. Relph, E, (2007) Spirit of Place and Sense of Place in Virtual Realities Technè 10:3 Spring Rosenman, M.A., Smith, G., Maher, M.L., Ding, L. And Marchant, D., (2007). Multidisciplinary collaborative design in virtual environments, Automation in Construction, 16 , p. 37 – 44. Rosenman, M., Merrick, K., Maher, M.L. and Marchant, D. (2006). DESIGNWORLD: A Multidisciplinary Collaborative Design Environment Using Agents in a Virtual World, in JS Gero (ed), Design Computing and Cognition'06, pp 695-710, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Sanchez, J. (2009). A Social History of Virtual Worlds. Library Technology Reports, 45( 2), pp.: 9- 12. Sánchez-Jankowski, M. (2002). Representation, Responsibility, and Reliability in Participant- Observation, In May, T. (ed.), Qualitative Research in Action, pp. 144-159, London:Sage. Santos, R.P. (2009). Second Life Physics: Virtual, Real Or Surreal Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2 (1). Schroeder, R. (1995). Virtual Environments and the Varieties of Interactive Experience in Information and Communication Technologies: An Analysis of Legend Quest, Convergence 1: 45. Schroeder, R. (2011). Being there together: Social interaction in virtual environments. New York: Oxford University Press. Schroeder, R. (2006). Being there together and the future of connected presence, Presence, 15 (4), pp. 438-454. Schroeder, R., Huxor, A., and Smith, A. (2001). Activeworlds: geography and social interaction in virtual reality, Futures, 33 (7), Pp. 569-587. Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse: the nexus of practice. New York: Routledge. Scollon, R. (2005). The rhythmic integration of action and discourse: Work, the body and the earth, in Norris, S. and Jones, R.H. (Eds.), Discourse in action: introducing mediated discourse analysis, pp. 20-31, Oxon: Routledge. 273
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S.W. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge. Scollon, R. and Scollon, S.W. (2004). Nexus analysis: discourse and the emerging internet, New York: Routledge. Schütz, A. and Luckmann, T. (1984 [1974]). Structure of the Life-World. London: Heinemann. Simon, H., 2009. Understanding the natural and artificial worlds, in Design Studies: A Reader, eds. Clark, H. And Brody, D., Berg, Oxford, UK. Simonsen, J., Bærenholdt, J.O., Büscher, M., and Scheuer, J.D. (2010). Design research: Synergies from interdisciplinary perspectives, Oxon: Routledge. Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative case studies, in Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3 rd edition), pp. 433-466, Thousand Oaks: Sage, Thousand Oaks. Stenglin, M. (2008). Binding: a resource for exploring interpersonal meaning in three-dimensional space, Social Semiotics, 18 (4), pp. 425-447. Stenglin, M., (2009). Space and communication in exhibitions: Unraveling the nexus, in C. Jewit (ed.) The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis, Oxon: Routledge. Stern, P.N. (2007). On Solid Ground: Essential Properties of Growing Grounded Theory, in (eds.) Bryant A. and Charmaz, K.Handbook of Grounded Theory, pp. 114-126, London: Sage. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence, Journal of Communication, 4(24) ,pp. 73-93. Stewart, D. and Mickunas, A. (1974). Exploring phenomenology: A guide to the field and its literature, Chicago: American Library Association. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Strauss, A. and Corbin. J., (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Taylor P. G. (2009). Can we move beyond visual metaphors Virtual world provocations and Second Life Journal of Virtual Worlds Research Vol. 2. No.1. 274
Page 2 and 3:
Prologue ‘So it isn’t the origi
Page 4 and 5:
Multimodal Semiotics and Collaborat
Page 6 and 7:
CHAPTER 3. Social semiotics, multim
Page 8 and 9:
Official and third party viewers
Page 10 and 11:
List of Figures Figure 4.1 Domains
Page 12 and 13:
List of Tables Table 2. 1 Theories
Page 14 and 15:
1. Introduction Virtual places and
Page 16 and 17:
technologies introduce new social w
Page 18 and 19:
innovation studies researchers have
Page 20 and 21:
contextual factors of collaborative
Page 22 and 23:
creative collaboration, and creativ
Page 24 and 25:
In a multimodal and multi-method ap
Page 26 and 27:
three case studies. This chapter al
Page 28 and 29:
2. Perspectives in virtual worlds r
Page 30 and 31:
making. In fact, it is possible to
Page 32 and 33:
virtual world technologies, it sign
Page 34 and 35:
collaborative actions that span qui
Page 36 and 37:
mediated social interaction with ot
Page 38 and 39:
their perceived effects on networke
Page 40 and 41:
ackdrop for the understanding of us
Page 42 and 43:
multidisciplinary working (Gu et al
Page 44 and 45:
Socio-cultural perspectives on co-d
Page 46 and 47:
innovation differs from Bonsu and D
Page 48 and 49:
In a place-centric socio-semiotic v
Page 50 and 51:
Theoretical Categories Concepts and
Page 52 and 53:
3. Social semiotics, multimodality
Page 54 and 55:
3.1. The social semiotic approach t
Page 56 and 57:
structures and analyzing the contex
Page 58 and 59:
designers’ purposeful orchestrati
Page 60 and 61:
communication as an essential semio
Page 62 and 63:
aspects of multimodal entities for
Page 64 and 65:
and-paste logic of online media, th
Page 66 and 67:
from the meaning-making practices,
Page 68 and 69:
and Turner 2004). Social Informatic
Page 70 and 71:
From this perspective, to build (an
Page 72 and 73:
human action unfolds in ‘three-di
Page 74 and 75:
genius loci idea to virtual places,
Page 76 and 77:
Michael de Certeau’s (1984) analy
Page 78 and 79:
semiotic practices, in all kinds of
Page 80 and 81:
follow similar considerations of ex
Page 82 and 83:
comparatively analyzing the multimo
Page 84 and 85:
Here, the relevant question for pos
Page 86 and 87:
3.6. Conclusion: social semiotics a
Page 88 and 89:
Theoretical Categories Concepts and
Page 90 and 91:
4. Theory and practice in design re
Page 92 and 93:
elations. One example of the formal
Page 94 and 95:
traditional distinctions between de
Page 96 and 97:
Research for design aims to provide
Page 98 and 99:
potentially offers to our senses. D
Page 100 and 101:
In sum, I consider affordances and
Page 102 and 103:
It is certainly important that desi
Page 104 and 105:
A solely production-based account o
Page 106 and 107:
design problems, while its variatio
Page 108 and 109:
user-driven innovations. Von Hippel
Page 110 and 111:
institutional contexts (Grossen 200
Page 112 and 113:
Meaning-oriented design theories
Page 114 and 115:
As explained in the Introduction ch
Page 116 and 117:
The multimodal social semiotic appr
Page 118 and 119:
them, and (b) experiential and inte
Page 120 and 121:
From multimodal analysis, I draw ce
Page 122 and 123:
phenomenology of time and space (an
Page 124 and 125:
My analytical framework includes a
Page 126 and 127:
characteristics of design in virtua
Page 128 and 129:
6. Methodology Introduction This ch
Page 130 and 131:
multimodal analysis in virtual worl
Page 132 and 133:
sensibilities, and methods of analy
Page 134 and 135:
are contextualized by the socio-tec
Page 136 and 137:
perspectives as the primary source
Page 138 and 139:
‣ Communication and Design in Vir
Page 140 and 141:
perspectives and methods. The evolu
Page 142 and 143:
designers are not necessarily geogr
Page 144 and 145:
material resources either by visiti
Page 146 and 147:
and selection of participants in co
Page 148 and 149:
also the reason why this case study
Page 150 and 151:
within each consequent case study,
Page 152 and 153:
created/constituted in the situated
Page 154 and 155:
than make overall statements and ge
Page 156 and 157:
in-depth qualitative understanding
Page 158 and 159:
7.1. The social actors and configur
Page 160 and 161:
The core design team consists of Ca
Page 162 and 163:
Curiza as the owner of the sim and
Page 164 and 165:
and appreciation. He says “if you
Page 166 and 167:
For Curiza, the hardest part of bei
Page 168 and 169:
context 5 . On the other hand, this
Page 170 and 171:
interviews, combined with findings
Page 172 and 173:
Comparisons with game experiences a
Page 174 and 175:
modification, combination and appro
Page 176 and 177:
Shaggy, who recommends designers to
Page 178 and 179:
he often used the Internet for “f
Page 180 and 181:
The variety of comments from the wo
Page 182 and 183:
technological developments but also
Page 184 and 185:
the four Moons group, a few members
Page 186 and 187:
esource for inspiration. Such inter
Page 188 and 189:
inworld discussion about the costum
Page 190 and 191:
“reminds the sounding of the word
Page 192 and 193:
Although Shaggy’s perspective abo
Page 194 and 195:
For Caitlyn, the major advantage of
Page 196 and 197:
PAL’s design. According to AmyLee
Page 198 and 199:
shared or collaborative edited by m
Page 200 and 201:
collaborative practices in order to
Page 202 and 203:
8. Analyzing multimodal discourse i
Page 204 and 205:
these places, their elevations and
Page 206 and 207:
(Rank-scale/ EXPERIENTIAL / INTERPE
Page 208 and 209:
Superheroes. Caitlyn, whose needs a
Page 210 and 211:
Figure 8.1. View from Metrotopia: T
Page 212 and 213:
Although Metrotopia was specificall
Page 214 and 215:
The Fight Club Dojo is designed to
Page 216 and 217:
Caitlyn: [W]e wanted to advertise,
Page 218 and 219:
of expression and reception of digi
Page 220 and 221:
In Curiza’s comment the introduct
Page 222 and 223:
textual functions of the content (m
Page 224 and 225:
their interest in such metaphors fo
Page 226 and 227:
Synthesis of the findings on experi
Page 228 and 229:
Caitlyn: [L]ooking at what makes up
Page 230 and 231:
Curiza: I told Xavier “Xavier I w
Page 232 and 233:
0 Figure 8.22. (left) Metrotopia Pa
Page 234 and 235:
and posters with positive political
Page 236 and 237: Synthesis of the findings on interp
Page 238 and 239: Figure 8.26. (left) The draw-bridge
Page 240 and 241: Use of prims as semiotic units is m
Page 242 and 243: Modes and multimodal design element
Page 244 and 245: Xavier: It was very, EXTREMELY colo
Page 246 and 247: Texts and images are often used tog
Page 248 and 249: placement of various interactive lo
Page 250 and 251: 9. Conclusions and discussions 9.1.
Page 252 and 253: and the lack of prior experience, p
Page 254 and 255: in flux in inworld collaborative de
Page 256 and 257: potentials, and aim to reinforce th
Page 258 and 259: Although not all of the co-designer
Page 260 and 261: As mentioned in the literature surv
Page 262 and 263: Drawing on this point, I also consi
Page 264 and 265: (Kress, 2010). The analysis of the
Page 266 and 267: although he also acknowledges the r
Page 268 and 269: creative activities and reduce the
Page 270 and 271: Further directions for research The
Page 272 and 273: Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). Speech, genre
Page 274 and 275: Charmaz, K., (2002). Qualitative in
Page 276 and 277: Fischer, G. and Giaccardi, E., (200
Page 278 and 279: Halliday, M.A.K. (2007). Language a
Page 280 and 281: Jones, J.C., (2009). What is design
Page 282 and 283: Lemke, J.L. (2005). Place, pace and
Page 284 and 285: Norman, D.A. (2008). The way I see
Page 288 and 289: Thackara, J. (2005). In the bubble:
Page 290 and 291: Summary in English Computer-generat
Page 292 and 293: Dansk resumé af afhandlingen Compu
Page 294 and 295: Interview Guide (Metrotopia and PAL
show all

Multimodal Semiotics and Collaborative Design

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?