Multimodal Semiotics and Collaborative Design

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Thackara, J. (2005). In the bubble: Designing in a complex world. Cambridge: MIT Press. Thomas, G. (2011). How to do your Case Study: A guide for students and researchers. London: Sage. Thomas, D., and Hollander, J.B. (2010). The city at play: Second Life and the virtual urban planning studio, Learning, Media and Technology, 35 (2), pp.227-242. Tonkiss, F. (2004). Using focus groups. In Seale, C. (ed.) Researching society and culture (2 nd edition), pp. 193-206,London: Sage. Tuan, Y (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Van de Ven, A.,H., and Poole, M.S. (1990). Methods for studying innovation development in Minnesota Innovation Research Program, Organization Science, 1 (3), pp.313-335. Van Leeuwen, T. (2005a). Introducing Social Semiotics. London and New York :Routledge. Van Leeuwen, T. (2005b). Multimodality, genre and design. In Norris, S. and Jones, R.H. (Eds.), Discourse in action: introducing mediated discourse analysis, pp. 73-94., Oxon:Routledge. Van Leeuwen, T., and Jewitt, C. (eds.) (2001). Handbook of visual analysis, London: Sage Publications. Voloshinov, V.N. ( 1973) [1929]). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Von Hippel, E. (1976). The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process, Research Policy, 5,pp. 212-239. Von Hippel, E. (2001). Perspective: User Toolkits for innovation, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18 (2001), 247-257. Von Hippel, E., and von Krogh, G. (2003). Open Source software and the ’Private-Collective’ innovation model: issues for organization science, Organization Science, 14(2), pp.209-223. Wade, A. (2008). Space pilot: an introduction to amateur flight simulation, Social Semiotics, 18(3), pp.277-288. 275
Wadley, G. and Ducheneaut, N. (2009). The ‘Out-Of-Avatar Experience’: Object-focused collaboration in Second Life. Proceedings of 11th European Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Work, Sep. 2009, Austria. Walker, J.,( 2009 [1989] ). Defining the object of study, in Clark, H. And Brody, D.,(Eds.) Design Studies: A Reader, Oxford:Berg. Wang, Q. and Heath, T. (2011). Towards a universal language of the built environment, Social Semiotics, 21(3), pp. 399-416. Weber, A., Rufer-Bach, K., and Platel, R. (2008). Creating your world: the official guide to content creation for Second Life. Indianapolis :Wiley Publishing Inc. Weiley, V. and Pisan, Y. (2008). The Distributed Studio: Towards a Theory of Virtual Place for Creative Collaboration, OZCHI 2008 Proceedings, December 8-12, 2008, Cairns, QLD, Australia. Wieviorka, M. (1992). Case studies: History or sociology In Ragin, C.C. and Becker, H.S. (Eds.)What is a case Exploring the foundations of social Inquiry, pp. 159-172, Cambridge: University Press Cambridge. Wisser, W. (2006). The cognitive artifacts of designing. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 276
Page 2 and 3:
Prologue ‘So it isn’t the origi
Page 4 and 5:
Multimodal Semiotics and Collaborat
Page 6 and 7:
CHAPTER 3. Social semiotics, multim
Page 8 and 9:
Official and third party viewers
Page 10 and 11:
List of Figures Figure 4.1 Domains
Page 12 and 13:
List of Tables Table 2. 1 Theories
Page 14 and 15:
1. Introduction Virtual places and
Page 16 and 17:
technologies introduce new social w
Page 18 and 19:
innovation studies researchers have
Page 20 and 21:
contextual factors of collaborative
Page 22 and 23:
creative collaboration, and creativ
Page 24 and 25:
In a multimodal and multi-method ap
Page 26 and 27:
three case studies. This chapter al
Page 28 and 29:
2. Perspectives in virtual worlds r
Page 30 and 31:
making. In fact, it is possible to
Page 32 and 33:
virtual world technologies, it sign
Page 34 and 35:
collaborative actions that span qui
Page 36 and 37:
mediated social interaction with ot
Page 38 and 39:
their perceived effects on networke
Page 40 and 41:
ackdrop for the understanding of us
Page 42 and 43:
multidisciplinary working (Gu et al
Page 44 and 45:
Socio-cultural perspectives on co-d
Page 46 and 47:
innovation differs from Bonsu and D
Page 48 and 49:
In a place-centric socio-semiotic v
Page 50 and 51:
Theoretical Categories Concepts and
Page 52 and 53:
3. Social semiotics, multimodality
Page 54 and 55:
3.1. The social semiotic approach t
Page 56 and 57:
structures and analyzing the contex
Page 58 and 59:
designers’ purposeful orchestrati
Page 60 and 61:
communication as an essential semio
Page 62 and 63:
aspects of multimodal entities for
Page 64 and 65:
and-paste logic of online media, th
Page 66 and 67:
from the meaning-making practices,
Page 68 and 69:
and Turner 2004). Social Informatic
Page 70 and 71:
From this perspective, to build (an
Page 72 and 73:
human action unfolds in ‘three-di
Page 74 and 75:
genius loci idea to virtual places,
Page 76 and 77:
Michael de Certeau’s (1984) analy
Page 78 and 79:
semiotic practices, in all kinds of
Page 80 and 81:
follow similar considerations of ex
Page 82 and 83:
comparatively analyzing the multimo
Page 84 and 85:
Here, the relevant question for pos
Page 86 and 87:
3.6. Conclusion: social semiotics a
Page 88 and 89:
Theoretical Categories Concepts and
Page 90 and 91:
4. Theory and practice in design re
Page 92 and 93:
elations. One example of the formal
Page 94 and 95:
traditional distinctions between de
Page 96 and 97:
Research for design aims to provide
Page 98 and 99:
potentially offers to our senses. D
Page 100 and 101:
In sum, I consider affordances and
Page 102 and 103:
It is certainly important that desi
Page 104 and 105:
A solely production-based account o
Page 106 and 107:
design problems, while its variatio
Page 108 and 109:
user-driven innovations. Von Hippel
Page 110 and 111:
institutional contexts (Grossen 200
Page 112 and 113:
Meaning-oriented design theories
Page 114 and 115:
As explained in the Introduction ch
Page 116 and 117:
The multimodal social semiotic appr
Page 118 and 119:
them, and (b) experiential and inte
Page 120 and 121:
From multimodal analysis, I draw ce
Page 122 and 123:
phenomenology of time and space (an
Page 124 and 125:
My analytical framework includes a
Page 126 and 127:
characteristics of design in virtua
Page 128 and 129:
6. Methodology Introduction This ch
Page 130 and 131:
multimodal analysis in virtual worl
Page 132 and 133:
sensibilities, and methods of analy
Page 134 and 135:
are contextualized by the socio-tec
Page 136 and 137:
perspectives as the primary source
Page 138 and 139:
‣ Communication and Design in Vir
Page 140 and 141:
perspectives and methods. The evolu
Page 142 and 143:
designers are not necessarily geogr
Page 144 and 145:
material resources either by visiti
Page 146 and 147:
and selection of participants in co
Page 148 and 149:
also the reason why this case study
Page 150 and 151:
within each consequent case study,
Page 152 and 153:
created/constituted in the situated
Page 154 and 155:
than make overall statements and ge
Page 156 and 157:
in-depth qualitative understanding
Page 158 and 159:
7.1. The social actors and configur
Page 160 and 161:
The core design team consists of Ca
Page 162 and 163:
Curiza as the owner of the sim and
Page 164 and 165:
and appreciation. He says “if you
Page 166 and 167:
For Curiza, the hardest part of bei
Page 168 and 169:
context 5 . On the other hand, this
Page 170 and 171:
interviews, combined with findings
Page 172 and 173:
Comparisons with game experiences a
Page 174 and 175:
modification, combination and appro
Page 176 and 177:
Shaggy, who recommends designers to
Page 178 and 179:
he often used the Internet for “f
Page 180 and 181:
The variety of comments from the wo
Page 182 and 183:
technological developments but also
Page 184 and 185:
the four Moons group, a few members
Page 186 and 187:
esource for inspiration. Such inter
Page 188 and 189:
inworld discussion about the costum
Page 190 and 191:
“reminds the sounding of the word
Page 192 and 193:
Although Shaggy’s perspective abo
Page 194 and 195:
For Caitlyn, the major advantage of
Page 196 and 197:
PAL’s design. According to AmyLee
Page 198 and 199:
shared or collaborative edited by m
Page 200 and 201:
collaborative practices in order to
Page 202 and 203:
8. Analyzing multimodal discourse i
Page 204 and 205:
these places, their elevations and
Page 206 and 207:
(Rank-scale/ EXPERIENTIAL / INTERPE
Page 208 and 209:
Superheroes. Caitlyn, whose needs a
Page 210 and 211:
Figure 8.1. View from Metrotopia: T
Page 212 and 213:
Although Metrotopia was specificall
Page 214 and 215:
The Fight Club Dojo is designed to
Page 216 and 217:
Caitlyn: [W]e wanted to advertise,
Page 218 and 219:
of expression and reception of digi
Page 220 and 221:
In Curiza’s comment the introduct
Page 222 and 223:
textual functions of the content (m
Page 224 and 225:
their interest in such metaphors fo
Page 226 and 227:
Synthesis of the findings on experi
Page 228 and 229:
Caitlyn: [L]ooking at what makes up
Page 230 and 231:
Curiza: I told Xavier “Xavier I w
Page 232 and 233:
0 Figure 8.22. (left) Metrotopia Pa
Page 234 and 235:
and posters with positive political
Page 236 and 237:
Synthesis of the findings on interp
Page 238 and 239: Figure 8.26. (left) The draw-bridge
Page 240 and 241: Use of prims as semiotic units is m
Page 242 and 243: Modes and multimodal design element
Page 244 and 245: Xavier: It was very, EXTREMELY colo
Page 246 and 247: Texts and images are often used tog
Page 248 and 249: placement of various interactive lo
Page 250 and 251: 9. Conclusions and discussions 9.1.
Page 252 and 253: and the lack of prior experience, p
Page 254 and 255: in flux in inworld collaborative de
Page 256 and 257: potentials, and aim to reinforce th
Page 258 and 259: Although not all of the co-designer
Page 260 and 261: As mentioned in the literature surv
Page 262 and 263: Drawing on this point, I also consi
Page 264 and 265: (Kress, 2010). The analysis of the
Page 266 and 267: although he also acknowledges the r
Page 268 and 269: creative activities and reduce the
Page 270 and 271: Further directions for research The
Page 272 and 273: Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). Speech, genre
Page 274 and 275: Charmaz, K., (2002). Qualitative in
Page 276 and 277: Fischer, G. and Giaccardi, E., (200
Page 278 and 279: Halliday, M.A.K. (2007). Language a
Page 280 and 281: Jones, J.C., (2009). What is design
Page 282 and 283: Lemke, J.L. (2005). Place, pace and
Page 284 and 285: Norman, D.A. (2008). The way I see
Page 286 and 287: Reinhard, C. D., & Dervin, B. (2010
Page 290 and 291: Summary in English Computer-generat
Page 292 and 293: Dansk resumé af afhandlingen Compu
Page 294 and 295: Interview Guide (Metrotopia and PAL
show all

Multimodal Semiotics and Collaborative Design

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?