Indian River County Impact Fee Study Final Report - irccdd.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table A-7 24-Hour Functional Population – Unincorporated County Area 24-Hour Functional Residents Population / Employment Category 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total Population 74,293 76,237 78,489 80,486 82,160 84,149 88,710 90,100 91,867 93,669 95,506 97,379 Functional Population - Residential 48,290 49,554 51,018 52,316 53,404 54,697 57,662 58,565 59,714 60,885 62,079 63,296 Functional Population - Employment Natural Resources 1,148 1,172 1,195 1,193 1,209 1,225 1,241 1,256 1,268 1,279 1,291 1,303 Construction 677 664 652 628 650 672 693 710 726 742 757 773 Manufacturing 665 682 699 732 742 751 761 770 778 786 795 803 Transportation, Communications, Utilities (TCU) and Warehousing 266 278 291 318 329 341 352 364 376 388 399 411 Wholesale Trade 234 245 256 232 236 240 244 248 253 258 262 267 Retail Trade 11,140 11,392 11,645 11,411 11,587 11,763 11,938 12,112 12,280 12,448 12,616 12,783 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate (FIRE) 936 953 971 1,023 1,047 1,071 1,096 1,118 1,136 1,154 1,172 1,190 Services 3,789 3,901 4,013 4,058 4,196 4,334 4,473 4,601 4,725 4,849 4,973 5,097 Government 1,720 1,746 1,772 1,786 1,850 1,914 1,978 2,033 2,083 2,133 2,183 2,233 Total Functional Residents 68,865 70,588 72,511 73,698 75,250 77,008 80,437 81,777 83,337 84,921 86,527 88,156 Ratio of Functional Residents to Residents 92.7% 92.6% 92.4% 91.6% 91.6% 91.5% 90.7% 90.8% 90.7% 90.7% 90.6% 90.5% Table A-8 11-Hour Functional Population – County 11-Hour Functional Residents Population / Employment Category 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total Population 117,181 120,247 123,799 126,749 129,386 132,580 138,393 140,562 143,318 146,129 148,996 151,918 Functional Population - Residential 41,013 42,086 43,330 44,362 45,285 46,403 48,438 49,197 50,161 51,145 52,149 53,171 Functional Population - Employment Natural Resources 4,520 4,613 4,705 4,697 4,760 4,823 4,886 4,944 4,990 5,036 5,082 5,129 Construction 2,983 2,929 2,876 2,769 2,865 2,961 3,057 3,131 3,200 3,270 3,339 3,408 Manufacturing 2,622 2,688 2,754 2,885 2,924 2,962 3,000 3,033 3,066 3,099 3,132 3,165 Transportation, Communications, Utilities (TCU) and Warehousing 1,046 1,096 1,145 1,252 1,296 1,341 1,384 1,434 1,480 1,526 1,572 1,618 Wholesale Trade 988 1,035 1,082 983 999 1,016 1,033 1,049 1,069 1,089 1,108 1,128 Retail Trade 21,346 21,830 22,314 21,867 22,203 22,541 22,877 23,207 23,525 23,844 24,162 24,481 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate (FIRE) 4,086 4,161 4,237 4,465 4,571 4,676 4,782 4,878 4,958 5,037 5,116 5,195 Services 16,538 17,028 17,518 17,712 18,316 18,919 19,523 20,085 20,627 21,168 21,710 22,251 Government 5,199 5,277 5,356 5,398 5,591 5,784 5,978 6,143 6,295 6,446 6,597 6,749 Total Functional Residents 100,341 102,744 105,317 106,390 108,811 111,425 114,957 117,102 119,371 121,659 123,967 126,295 Ratio of Functional Residents to Residents 85.6% 85.4% 85.1% 83.9% 84.1% 84.0% 83.1% 83.3% 83.3% 83.3% 83.2% 83.1% Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County May 2005 A-4 Impact Fee Study
Tables A-9 through A-11 provide supporting documentation on how the residential coefficients for functional population were calculated. Table A-9 IRC Population and Employment Characteristics Item/Calculation Step Figure Workers who live and work in IRC (1) 39,072 Workers who live elsewhere but work in IRC (2) 9,049 Total workers in IRC (3) 48,121 Workers who live in IRC but work elsewhere (4) 5,804 Weighted average worker population for workers who move between Counties (5) 7,156 Total effective workers (6) 46,228 Population (7) 112,947 Total effective workers as a percent of population (8) 41% School age population (5-17 years) (9) 16,435 Percent of total population (10) 15% Population net of workers & school age population (11) 51,636 Percent of total population (12) 46% (1) Source: US Census Bureau, County-to-County Worker Flow Files, 2000 (2) Source: US Census Bureau, County-to-County Worker Flow Files, 2000 (3) Sum of workers who live and work in IRC (Item 1) and workers who live elsewhere but work in IRC (Item 2). (4) Source: US Census Bureau, County-to-County Worker Flow Files, 2000 (5) Weighted average is calculated by using the assumption that workers who do not reside in IRC (Item 2) are in IRC for 10 hours per day while workers who are IRC residents but work outside the County (Item 4) are in IRC for 14 hours per day. The resulting equation is [(9,049 x 10/24) + (5,804 x 14/24)]. (6) Sum of workers who live and work in IRC (Item 1) and weighted average worker population (Item 5). (7) Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census (8) Total effective workers (Item 6) divided by population (Item 7). (9) Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census (10) School age population (Item 9) divided by population (Item 7). (11) Population (Item 7) less workers who live and work in IRC (Item 1), workers who live in IRC and work elsewhere (Item 4), and school age population (Item 9). (12) Population net of workers and school age population (Item 11) divided by total population (Item 7). Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County May 2005 A-5 Impact Fee Study
Page 2 and 3:
(This page left blank intentionally
Page 4 and 5:
Credit Component...................
Page 6 and 7:
Tables Proposed Parks and Recreatio
Page 8 and 9:
Table VI-5 Comparison of IRC Curren
Page 10 and 11:
Maps Map III-1 Correctional Facilit
Page 12 and 13:
Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Ap
Page 14 and 15:
o A non-charter county may adopt co
Page 16 and 17:
• Most communities make the effec
Page 18 and 19:
• Reasonable administrative costs
Page 20 and 21:
• The BCC may establish a policy
Page 22 and 23:
Table I-2 Current and Recommended S
Page 24 and 25:
Table I-4 Historical and Projected
Page 26 and 27:
(This space intentionally left blan
Page 28 and 29:
Table II-1 IRC Population Estimates
Page 30 and 31:
Table II-4 Unincorporated County Ar
Page 32 and 33:
Table II-8 Unincorporated County Ar
Page 34 and 35:
Residential Functional Population I
Page 36 and 37:
Table II-10 11-Hour/5-Day General F
Page 38 and 39:
Table II-12 Countywide Excluding In
Page 40 and 41:
Table II-14 Countywide Functional P
Page 42 and 43:
Table II-16 Functional Residents fo
Page 44 and 45:
Table II-19 Assumptions for Nonresi
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Table III-1 Land & Buildings Invent
Page 50 and 51:
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. I
Page 52 and 53:
Table III-3 Level of Service Compar
Page 54 and 55:
Table III-6 Equipment Cost Equipmen
Page 56 and 57:
Table III-9 Historical Capital Expe
Page 58 and 59:
Existing Deficiencies As discussed
Page 60 and 61:
Table III-13 (continued) Impact Fee
Page 62 and 63:
Table III-15 Annual Impact Fee Reve
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
• The SWDD also operates five cus
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Demand Component Based on the LOS s
Page 74 and 75:
Table IV-4 Proposed Capital Expendi
Page 76 and 77:
As mentioned previously, future cap
Page 78 and 79:
Table IV-7 Historical Revenue Sourc
Page 80 and 81:
The following table provides a summ
Page 82 and 83:
Existing Deficiencies As presented
Page 84 and 85:
Table IV-13 Proposed Solid Waste Im
Page 86 and 87:
Estimated Revenues As presented in
Page 88 and 89:
Table V-1 Summary of Public Buildin
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Services provided by County-owned a
Page 94 and 95:
Table V-6 Public Building Replaceme
Page 96 and 97:
Table V-8 summarizes the capital ex
Page 98 and 99:
The vacant land value as a percenta
Page 100 and 101:
Table V-12 Proposed Public Building
Page 102 and 103:
Table V-13 2025 Demand and Cost For
Page 104 and 105:
guideline in planning future infras
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
In addition to the available materi
Page 112 and 113:
Table VI-5 compares the County’s
Page 114 and 115:
Table VI-8 Building Unit Costs (1)
Page 116 and 117:
Library Materials and Equipment The
Page 118 and 119:
Table VI-13 Library Materials and E
Page 120 and 121:
It should be noted that it is the C
Page 122 and 123:
Table VI-17 Total Credit per Reside
Page 124 and 125:
Table VI-19 Persons per Housing Uni
Page 126 and 127:
(1) Source: Section II, Table II-1
Page 128 and 129:
As presented in Table VI-21, the pr
Page 130 and 131:
Table VII-1 Land & Buildings Invent
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Table VII-3 Capital Equipment Repla
Page 136 and 137:
Table VII-5 Current Level of Servic
Page 138 and 139:
Table VII-7 Station Equipment Costs
Page 140 and 141:
Table VII-10 Six-Year Historical Ca
Page 142 and 143:
Table VII-12 Percent of Past Proper
Page 144 and 145:
Table VII-14 Proposed Fire/EMS Impa
Page 146 and 147:
Table VII-15 2025 Demand and Cost F
Page 148 and 149:
guideline in planning future infras
Page 150 and 151:
Table VIII-1 Land and Building Inve
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
unincorporated county area. The cur
Page 156 and 157:
Table VIII-6 Equipment Cost Equipme
Page 158 and 159:
Table VIII-8 Historical Capital Exp
Page 160 and 161:
Table VIII-10 Vacant Land Value Per
Page 162 and 163:
Table VIII-12 Net Impact Cost Impac
Page 164 and 165:
Table VIII-13 (continued) Proposed
Page 166 and 167:
Table VIII-15 Annual Impact Fee Rev
Page 168 and 169: (This space intentionally left blan
Page 172 and 173: Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. I
Page 174 and 175: Cost Component Cost per Student Sta
Page 176 and 177: Total Impact Cost per Student Stati
Page 178 and 179: fees is given only for revenue used
Page 180 and 181: Table IX-5 2-Mill Revenue Credit Ca
Page 182 and 183: Table IX-7 Net Impact Cost per Stud
Page 184 and 185: Table IX-10 2025 Demand and Cost Fo
Page 186 and 187: As presented in Table IX-10, the pr
Page 191: Table X-1 (Continued) Parks & Recre
Page 194 and 195: Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. I
Page 196 and 197: Table X-2 Parks & Recreation Facili
Page 198 and 199: was calculated using historical exp
Page 200 and 201: Table X-7 Regional Parks Equipment/
Page 202 and 203: Table X-9 Programmed Capital Costs
Page 204 and 205: Table X-11 Historical Capital Expen
Page 206 and 207: Table X-13 Vacant Land Value Percen
Page 208 and 209: Table X-15 Net Impact Cost per Resi
Page 210 and 211: Table X-18 2025 Demand and Cost For
Page 212 and 213: For impact fee purposes, revenue pr
Page 214 and 215: (This page left blank intentionally
Page 216 and 217: Table A-3 24-Hour Baseline - Uninco
Page 220 and 221: The resulting percentages from Tabl
Page 222 and 223: Table A-14 IRC Weighted Average Sea
Page 230 and 231: Table C-1 Proposed Solid Waste Impa
Page 236 and 237: Table D-2 IRC School District Inven
Page 242 and 243: Table F-2 Inventory of Available Im
Page 244 and 245: Table F-2 Inventory of Available Im
Page 246 and 247: Table F-3-2 Comparison of Standards
Page 248 and 249: County SF per Capita Table F-3-4 Co
Page 258 and 259: Table G-2 Solid Waste - Residential
Page 260 and 261: Table G-4 Library Facilities - Resi
Page 262 and 263: Table G-6 Law Enforcement - Residen
Page 264 and 265: Table G-8 Park and Recreation Facil
Page 268 and 269:
Presentation Overview 1 2 3 4 5 6 B
Page 270 and 271:
Background • BCC initiated study
Page 272 and 273:
Decision Points Decision Points Enc
Page 274 and 275:
Basic Impact Fee Formula Impact Fee
Page 276 and 277:
Distribution of Impact Fees Transpo
Page 278 and 279:
2 Legal Requirements
Page 280 and 281:
Impact Fee vs. Tax • An impact fe
Page 282 and 283:
Authority in IRC • Non-charter co
Page 284 and 285:
Defendable Methodology • Study th
Page 286 and 287:
Revenue Credits • Ensure proporti
Page 288 and 289:
Administration • Must be easy to
Page 290 and 291:
Effective Date • May be effective
Page 292 and 293:
Applicability • Creates a measura
Page 294 and 295:
Decision Point Will each city enter
Page 296 and 297:
Imposition & Collection • As earl
Page 298 and 299:
Use of Impact Fee Revenue • Must
Page 300 and 301:
Decision Point The consultant recom
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Decision Points The consultant reco
Page 308 and 309:
4 LOS Standards
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Impact Fee Comparisons • Single F
Page 314 and 315:
5 Funding Sources (see Table 4)
Page 316 and 317:
Decision Point Does the BCC want to
Page 318:
Next Steps • Finalize Data Collec
show all

Indian River County Impact Fee Study Final Report - irccdd.com

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?