Indian River County Impact Fee Study Final Report - irccdd.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

County SF per Capita Table F-3-4 Comparison of Standards by Impact Fee Program Area 4 - Library Impact Fee Current LOS Rank Volumes per Capita Indian River 0.58 3 3.20 1 Rank Florida LOS Standard SF per Capita Volumes per Capita Source Information Provided by IRC Library Services for Current Impact Fee Study Brevard 0.72 1 2.39 2 Martin 0.70 2 1.83 3 Osceola 0.45 4 1.77 5 2003 Library Directory with Statistics (Corresponding to year 2001-2002) 2003 Library Directory with Statistics (Corresponding to year 2001-2002) 2003 Library Directory with Statistics (Corresponding to year 2001-2002) Collier 0.36 9 1.60 6 Collier County Library Impact fee Update Citrus 0.43 5 1.26 10 Okeechobee 0.42 6 1.28 9 Wakulla 0.41 7 1.51 8 St. Johns 0.40 8 1.91 4 St. Lucie 0.31 10 1.53 7 0.60 2.00 2003 Library Directory with Statistics (Corresponding to year 2001-2002) 2003 Library Directory with Statistics (Corresponding to year 2001-2002) 2003 Library Directory with Statistics (Corresponding to year 2001-2002) 2003 Library Directory with Statistics (Corresponding to year 2001-2002) 2003 Library Directory with Statistics (Corresponding to year 2001-2002) F-8
Table F-3-5 Comparison of Standards by Impact Fee Program Area County Area 5 - Fire/Emergency Services Impact Fee Stations/1,000 Response Time Sq. Feet/ Resident Residents (minutes) Current Current Current Functional LOS Std LOS Std LOS Std LOS LOS LOS Population (1) Source Indian River Fire/EMS 0.089 N/A Y IRC Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use Element - Policy 2.8.a Martin Fire/EMS 0.680 0.650 Y St. Johns Fire/EMS 0.180 N/A Y Development Impact Fee Update Study Technical Memorandum on the Methods of Updating Impact Fees Arthur C. Nelson James C. Nicholas Citrus Fire 0.650 N/A Y Impact Fee Update Study Duncan Associates Jan-01 Jul-99 Feb-98 Citrus EMS 0.036 N/A Y Impact Fee Update Study Duncan Associates Jan-01 Brevard Fire 0.120 0.100 Y Impact Fee Update Study TOA Mar-00 Brevard EMS 0.046 0.048 Y Impact Fee Update Study TOA Mar-00 Collier EMS 0.068 N/A 6.000 6.300 Y EMS Development Impact Fee Update Study TOA May-00 (1) Functional Population represents the number of "full-time equivalent" people present in a geographic area or site. It can be measured on a 24-hour basis (24 hours each day, seven days each week) or on a daytime basis (16 hours each day, seven days each week). Functional residents allow one to (a) measure the level of service on an area-wide basis and (b) estimate demands for F-9
Page 2 and 3:
(This page left blank intentionally
Page 4 and 5:
Credit Component...................
Page 6 and 7:
Tables Proposed Parks and Recreatio
Page 8 and 9:
Table VI-5 Comparison of IRC Curren
Page 10 and 11:
Maps Map III-1 Correctional Facilit
Page 12 and 13:
Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Ap
Page 14 and 15:
o A non-charter county may adopt co
Page 16 and 17:
• Most communities make the effec
Page 18 and 19:
• Reasonable administrative costs
Page 20 and 21:
• The BCC may establish a policy
Page 22 and 23:
Table I-2 Current and Recommended S
Page 24 and 25:
Table I-4 Historical and Projected
Page 26 and 27:
(This space intentionally left blan
Page 28 and 29:
Table II-1 IRC Population Estimates
Page 30 and 31:
Table II-4 Unincorporated County Ar
Page 32 and 33:
Table II-8 Unincorporated County Ar
Page 34 and 35:
Residential Functional Population I
Page 36 and 37:
Table II-10 11-Hour/5-Day General F
Page 38 and 39:
Table II-12 Countywide Excluding In
Page 40 and 41:
Table II-14 Countywide Functional P
Page 42 and 43:
Table II-16 Functional Residents fo
Page 44 and 45:
Table II-19 Assumptions for Nonresi
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Table III-1 Land & Buildings Invent
Page 50 and 51:
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. I
Page 52 and 53:
Table III-3 Level of Service Compar
Page 54 and 55:
Table III-6 Equipment Cost Equipmen
Page 56 and 57:
Table III-9 Historical Capital Expe
Page 58 and 59:
Existing Deficiencies As discussed
Page 60 and 61:
Table III-13 (continued) Impact Fee
Page 62 and 63:
Table III-15 Annual Impact Fee Reve
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
• The SWDD also operates five cus
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Demand Component Based on the LOS s
Page 74 and 75:
Table IV-4 Proposed Capital Expendi
Page 76 and 77:
As mentioned previously, future cap
Page 78 and 79:
Table IV-7 Historical Revenue Sourc
Page 80 and 81:
The following table provides a summ
Page 82 and 83:
Existing Deficiencies As presented
Page 84 and 85:
Table IV-13 Proposed Solid Waste Im
Page 86 and 87:
Estimated Revenues As presented in
Page 88 and 89:
Table V-1 Summary of Public Buildin
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Services provided by County-owned a
Page 94 and 95:
Table V-6 Public Building Replaceme
Page 96 and 97:
Table V-8 summarizes the capital ex
Page 98 and 99:
The vacant land value as a percenta
Page 100 and 101:
Table V-12 Proposed Public Building
Page 102 and 103:
Table V-13 2025 Demand and Cost For
Page 104 and 105:
guideline in planning future infras
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
In addition to the available materi
Page 112 and 113:
Table VI-5 compares the County’s
Page 114 and 115:
Table VI-8 Building Unit Costs (1)
Page 116 and 117:
Library Materials and Equipment The
Page 118 and 119:
Table VI-13 Library Materials and E
Page 120 and 121:
It should be noted that it is the C
Page 122 and 123:
Table VI-17 Total Credit per Reside
Page 124 and 125:
Table VI-19 Persons per Housing Uni
Page 126 and 127:
(1) Source: Section II, Table II-1
Page 128 and 129:
As presented in Table VI-21, the pr
Page 130 and 131:
Table VII-1 Land & Buildings Invent
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Table VII-3 Capital Equipment Repla
Page 136 and 137:
Table VII-5 Current Level of Servic
Page 138 and 139:
Table VII-7 Station Equipment Costs
Page 140 and 141:
Table VII-10 Six-Year Historical Ca
Page 142 and 143:
Table VII-12 Percent of Past Proper
Page 144 and 145:
Table VII-14 Proposed Fire/EMS Impa
Page 146 and 147:
Table VII-15 2025 Demand and Cost F
Page 148 and 149:
guideline in planning future infras
Page 150 and 151:
Table VIII-1 Land and Building Inve
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
unincorporated county area. The cur
Page 156 and 157:
Table VIII-6 Equipment Cost Equipme
Page 158 and 159:
Table VIII-8 Historical Capital Exp
Page 160 and 161:
Table VIII-10 Vacant Land Value Per
Page 162 and 163:
Table VIII-12 Net Impact Cost Impac
Page 164 and 165:
Table VIII-13 (continued) Proposed
Page 166 and 167:
Table VIII-15 Annual Impact Fee Rev
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Cost Component Cost per Student Sta
Page 176 and 177:
Total Impact Cost per Student Stati
Page 178 and 179:
fees is given only for revenue used
Page 180 and 181:
Table IX-5 2-Mill Revenue Credit Ca
Page 182 and 183:
Table IX-7 Net Impact Cost per Stud
Page 184 and 185:
Table IX-10 2025 Demand and Cost Fo
Page 186 and 187:
As presented in Table IX-10, the pr
Page 188 and 189:
Page 191:
Table X-1 (Continued) Parks & Recre
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Table X-2 Parks & Recreation Facili
Page 198 and 199: was calculated using historical exp
Page 200 and 201: Table X-7 Regional Parks Equipment/
Page 202 and 203: Table X-9 Programmed Capital Costs
Page 204 and 205: Table X-11 Historical Capital Expen
Page 206 and 207: Table X-13 Vacant Land Value Percen
Page 208 and 209: Table X-15 Net Impact Cost per Resi
Page 210 and 211: Table X-18 2025 Demand and Cost For
Page 212 and 213: For impact fee purposes, revenue pr
Page 214 and 215: (This page left blank intentionally
Page 216 and 217: Table A-3 24-Hour Baseline - Uninco
Page 218 and 219: Table A-7 24-Hour Functional Popula
Page 220 and 221: The resulting percentages from Tabl
Page 222 and 223: Table A-14 IRC Weighted Average Sea
Page 230 and 231: Table C-1 Proposed Solid Waste Impa
Page 236 and 237: Table D-2 IRC School District Inven
Page 242 and 243: Table F-2 Inventory of Available Im
Page 244 and 245: Table F-2 Inventory of Available Im
Page 246 and 247: Table F-3-2 Comparison of Standards
Page 258 and 259: Table G-2 Solid Waste - Residential
Page 260 and 261: Table G-4 Library Facilities - Resi
Page 262 and 263: Table G-6 Law Enforcement - Residen
Page 264 and 265: Table G-8 Park and Recreation Facil
Page 268 and 269: Presentation Overview 1 2 3 4 5 6 B
Page 270 and 271: Background • BCC initiated study
Page 272 and 273: Decision Points Decision Points Enc
Page 274 and 275: Basic Impact Fee Formula Impact Fee
Page 276 and 277: Distribution of Impact Fees Transpo
Page 278 and 279: 2 Legal Requirements
Page 280 and 281: Impact Fee vs. Tax • An impact fe
Page 282 and 283: Authority in IRC • Non-charter co
Page 284 and 285: Defendable Methodology • Study th
Page 286 and 287: Revenue Credits • Ensure proporti
Page 288 and 289: Administration • Must be easy to
Page 290 and 291: Effective Date • May be effective
Page 292 and 293: Applicability • Creates a measura
Page 294 and 295: Decision Point Will each city enter
Page 296 and 297: Imposition & Collection • As earl
Page 298 and 299:
Use of Impact Fee Revenue • Must
Page 300 and 301:
Decision Point The consultant recom
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Decision Points The consultant reco
Page 308 and 309:
4 LOS Standards
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Impact Fee Comparisons • Single F
Page 314 and 315:
5 Funding Sources (see Table 4)
Page 316 and 317:
Decision Point Does the BCC want to
Page 318:
Next Steps • Finalize Data Collec
show all

Indian River County Impact Fee Study Final Report - irccdd.com

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?