San Luis Obispo - Caltrans - State of California
San Luis Obispo - Caltrans - State of California
San Luis Obispo - Caltrans - State of California
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SAN LUIS OBISPO REGION<br />
COORDINATED HUMAN SERVICES-PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN<br />
CHAPTER 3: QUANTITATIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT<br />
This chapter presents the community outreach survey findings and sets forth an estimate <strong>of</strong><br />
demand for specialized transportation. The stakeholder survey was conducted to bring new<br />
players into the transportation planning environment and to quantify needs and resources, to the<br />
greatest extent possible. The demand estimation is built up from Census information on the<br />
target population members and trip rates drawn from national research sources.<br />
3.1 STAKEHOLDER SURVEY INTRODUCTION AND APPROACH<br />
The stakeholder survey was designed to bring quantitative descriptions to the needs<br />
assessment, both about existing public transportation services and about human service<br />
resources and needs. The mail-back survey approach and findings are described here.<br />
Constructing a Mailing List<br />
Considerable effort was made to construct a master database that would reflect the breadth <strong>of</strong><br />
human services and public transit organizations in the <strong>San</strong> <strong>Luis</strong> <strong>Obispo</strong> region. A primary<br />
source document was the Hotline directory [www.slohotline.org], entitled the Human Services<br />
and Support Groups Directory for <strong>San</strong> <strong>Luis</strong> <strong>Obispo</strong> County. This countywide listing is<br />
regularly published, with the most current version, 2005, used for this effort. Approximately 325<br />
agencies and organizations were added through this directory.<br />
Additionally from the <strong>California</strong> Motor Vehicle Department, the <strong>California</strong> Highway Patrol (CHP)<br />
terminal yard listings were obtained. This list reflects those transportation operators that the<br />
CHP inspects annually for safety and compliance with <strong>California</strong> code. There were 41 current<br />
records for the 2006 year in the CHP terminal yard inspection listing. Finally, some Internet<br />
searching was done to check lists <strong>of</strong> senior centers, adult day health care centers and major<br />
social service agencies among others. Approximately 60 to 70 records were added or confirmed<br />
through this process. Several delete duplicate activities were necessary, to remove outright<br />
duplicate agency records and to consolidate other records where two contacts existed. Also,<br />
addresses returned through the mailing were deleted as well.<br />
An initial database <strong>of</strong> just under 400 records was constructed for the first mailing. This was<br />
reduced by bad address and returned mail, as well as augmented by new address information<br />
for a database count as <strong>of</strong> this writing <strong>of</strong> 379 records.<br />
Designing the Survey<br />
The survey tool itself was modified to reflect the <strong>San</strong> <strong>Luis</strong> <strong>Obispo</strong> region but derived from earlier<br />
versions used in three Southern <strong>California</strong> counties: <strong>San</strong> Diego, Ventura and Los Angeles<br />
Counties. The survey was designed around two primary objectives. First, it was intended to be<br />
easy-to-answer, short and kept to no more than two-pages, with as many check-box and<br />
closed-ended responses as possible. Secondly, it was applicable both to agencies who did not<br />
provide transportation and to those who did provide transportation. The rationale for this is that<br />
both groups have some understanding <strong>of</strong> unmet transportation needs, albeit from different<br />
perspectives.<br />
The first page <strong>of</strong> the survey was applicable to all potential respondents and sought information<br />
about the responding agency, as well as opinions about unmet transportation needs and<br />
23<br />
OCTOBER 2007