San Luis Obispo - Caltrans - State of California

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SAN LUIS OBISPO REGION COORDINATED HUMAN SERVICES-PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN Figure 3-5 2007 Stakeholder Survey Client Trip Needs Poorly Served - by Agency Type Doctor/medical trips 72% 90% Shopping and morning errands 51% 70% Kids to daycare or school 15% 70% Work between 8am-5pm 23% 60% Recreational activities or events Night/ early morning work shifts 21% 21% 50% 50% Visiting family or friends 17% 40% Training/ education classes Weekend and holiday trips 17% 30% 30% 43% Human Service G.P. Transit Specific trips by origin/destination 0% 10% Long distance trips 0% 30% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent Responding Agencies by Type Human Services =47; General Public Transit =10; n=57 Other needs noted in the open-ended parts of the survey included: • Establishing service between Cambria and Paso Robles along Route 46 (Economic Opportunity Commission), • General intercity transportation needs (Silverado Stages, Inc.), • Long distance trips for conferences and training (Work Training Programs, Inc.) • Long distance trips for dialysis purposes or other medical purposes (Kidney Dialysis Center, SLO; California Children’s Services; Life Steps; NCI; SLO County Public Health Dept.) • Service within San Luis Obispo from Prado Rd. and Higuera to South Broad via Tank Farm Road to establish connectivity between the Prado Day Center and the Creekside one-stop services center (Dept. of Social Services), • Medical trips to Santa Barbara’s Sansum Clinic or doctors’ offices (Coast Caregiver Resource Center) 33 OCTOBER 2007
3.2.3 Coordination Interest and Experience SAN LUIS OBISPO REGION COORDINATED HUMAN SERVICES-PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN Coordination Interest for Lowering Costs and Improving Transportation Survey respondents were asked about coordination interest with the question “Please indicate your areas of interest to lower costs or improve transportation.” Respondents could check as many options among the twelve choices as might apply, or indicate no interest. Figure 3-6 shows the combined respondents, with only 11 agencies (18 percent) indicating not interested at this time. Two areas generated the greatest interests as stated by 17 agencies at 28 percent each: • coordinated service operations and • coordinated trip scheduling and dispatch This may indicate a desire to purchase trips or to obtain additional vehicle capacity through a coordinated system, without having to operate the vehicles by one’s own agency. Agencies’ intent or specific needs will have to be further explored to understand their requirements. There are similar levels of interest in the next three areas, with 15 percent of agencies reporting some interest in: ‣ Contracting out for service; ‣ Shared vehicle maintenance facilities; and ‣ Coordinated equipment purchases. Nine agencies selected these three options (Figure 3-6). The next grouping of interest areas included coordinating training and retraining options (7 agencies-11 percent); shared or pooled use of vehicles (7 agencies-11 percent); and pooling of funding in order to better coordinate services (6 agencies-10 percent). The final option in this grouping was the joint purchasing of insurance, equipment or supplies that support the transportation function (4 agencies, 7 percent). Just a couple of agencies indicated interest in each of the final areas: acting as the contractor to provide transportation to other agencies (3 agencies-5 percent), joint purchase of insurance (2 agencies-3 percent) and shared fueling or vehicle storage facilities (2 agencies- 3 percent). Agencies noting “other” interest, in Figure 3-6, included the Templeton Chamber of Commerce indicating they could help promote available public transit services and the San Luis Coast Unified School District indicating that they could transport students to Cuesta and to and from home during non-District served hours. 34 OCTOBER 2007
Page 1 and 2: COORDINATED HUMAN SERVICES - PUBLIC
Page 3 and 4: SAN LUIS OBISPO REGION COORDINATED
Page 13 and 14: Gaps in service, continued SAN LUIS
Page 49: SAN LUIS OBISPO REGION COORDINATED
Page 101 and 102:
SAN LUIS OBISPO REGION COORDINATED
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
GOAL 2.0: BUILD CAPACITY TO MEET IN
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
___________________________________
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Ride-On Interview at Ride-On office
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199:
show all

San Luis Obispo - Caltrans - State of California

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?