03.03.2015 Views

California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2005</strong>-<strong>06</strong> – <strong>2015</strong>-<strong>16</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE<br />

Figure 8B shows ridership and financial performance data on an annual basis from<br />

the start of <strong>State</strong>-supported Amtrak rail passenger service in 1991-92 through<br />

2004-05. Ridership and revenues have increased over that period, as have<br />

expenses, loss, and <strong>State</strong> cost. The farebox ratio on this Route has not fluctuated<br />

as much as on the San Joaquins and Pacific Surfliners for a number of reasons.<br />

First, when the Capi<strong>to</strong>l Corridor service started, Amtrak had already begun<br />

increasing costs that are included in the farebox ratio. By 1996-97, Amtrak was<br />

charging a cost basis similar <strong>to</strong> the current basis. Also, the Capi<strong>to</strong>l Corridor<br />

service is still relatively new and has added frequencies at a relatively fast rate.<br />

Thus, the growth tends <strong>to</strong> be offset by new costs for increased frequencies. The<br />

Capi<strong>to</strong>l Corridor service has a lower a farebox ratio than the other two routes,<br />

primarily as a result of its shorter trip length. The Capi<strong>to</strong>l Corridor farebox ratio<br />

(37.8 percent in 2004-05) has ranged between a high of 43.4 percent in 1995-96<br />

and a low of 29 percent in 1996-97.<br />

OTP on the Capi<strong>to</strong>l Corridor was fairly low during the initial years of the service.<br />

With the completion in early 1999 of major track and signal work over much of<br />

the route, OTP improved considerably. In 2004-05, OTP averaged 86.6 percent.<br />

The planned new trackage and signal improvement projects between Oakland and<br />

San Jose will improve the Capi<strong>to</strong>l Corridor’s reliability and OTP by facilitating<br />

both passenger and freight train movements and by providing more opportunities<br />

for trains <strong>to</strong> pass each other.<br />

ROUTE DESCRIPTION<br />

The Capi<strong>to</strong>l Corridor now has four weekday round-trips between Oakland and<br />

San Jose (six on weekends), twelve weekday round-trips between Oakland and<br />

Sacramen<strong>to</strong> (nine on weekends), and one daily Sacramen<strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong> Auburn round-trip.<br />

Scheduled running time between Oakland and Sacramen<strong>to</strong> averages<br />

1 hour-50 minutes (for trains starting or ending in Oakland) with the overall speed<br />

averaging 44 mph. Scheduled running time between Oakland and San Jose<br />

averages 1 hour-13 minutes with the overall speed averaging 36 mph. Scheduled<br />

running time between Sacramen<strong>to</strong> and Auburn averages one hour and four<br />

minutes with the overall speed averaging 33 mph.<br />

The Capi<strong>to</strong>l Corridor extends <strong>16</strong>9 rail miles from Auburn <strong>to</strong> San Jose (35 miles<br />

east of Sacramen<strong>to</strong> and 134 miles west of Sacramen<strong>to</strong>.) Except for three miles of<br />

ROW owned by the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, UP owns this entire<br />

route. Amtrak operates the Capi<strong>to</strong>l Corridor under provisions of its contract with<br />

UP. Figure 8C describes the current ownership, segment mileage, and track and<br />

signal characteristics of the Capi<strong>to</strong>l Corridor.<br />

98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!