03.03.2015 Views

California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter XVIII – Environmental Review<br />

higher. Normalizing this data through <strong>to</strong>n-miles transported provides a<br />

comparable emission value per efficiency between modes. On a <strong>to</strong>n-mile basis,<br />

locomotives generate from one-third <strong>to</strong> one-twelfth the emissions of heavy diesel<br />

trucks.<br />

EMISSION STANDARDS FOR RAIL VEHICLES<br />

Smoke emissions from newly manufactured and remanufactured diesel-powered<br />

locomotives and locomotive engines, which had previously been unregulated have<br />

been made subject <strong>to</strong> Federal standards. 31<br />

The new standards result in nearly a two-thirds reduction in NOx emissions and<br />

nearly half the HC and PM emissions nationwide. This equates <strong>to</strong> a 304,000 <strong>to</strong>n<br />

NOx emission reduction in <strong>2005</strong>, equivalent <strong>to</strong> removing nearly 20 million cars<br />

from the road. Because NOx contributes <strong>to</strong> the reduction of secondary PM, the<br />

new standards result in a reduction of 12,000 <strong>to</strong>ns per year of PM. 32<br />

The EPA estimates that the lifetime cost per locomotive will be approximately<br />

$70,000 for the Tier 0 standards, $186,000 for the Tier 1 standards and $252,000<br />

for Tier 2 standards. Lifetime cost components consist of initial equipment costs;<br />

remanufacturing costs; fuel economy costs; and certification, production line and<br />

in-use testing costs. The average annual cost of this program is estimated <strong>to</strong> be<br />

$80 million. This would be about 0.2 percent of the <strong>to</strong>tal freight revenue for<br />

railroads in 1995. The average cost-effectiveness of the standards is expected <strong>to</strong><br />

be about $<strong>16</strong>3 per <strong>to</strong>n of NOx, PM and HC. 33<br />

Due <strong>to</strong> by the interstate nature of railroads, the EPA-adopted regulations preempt<br />

certain local and state requirements for controlling locomotive emissions.<br />

ENFORCEMENT<br />

The EPA rules established an enforcement regime including individual<br />

locomotive/engine certification, requirements for maintenance records for actions<br />

that might impact emission performance, and an annual fleet testing program <strong>to</strong><br />

moni<strong>to</strong>r the in-use emissions. Short line railroads are exempt from EPA<br />

locomotive standards by virtue of being small businesses with less than<br />

500 employees.<br />

The <strong>California</strong> ARB entered in<strong>to</strong> a memorandum of mutual understandings and<br />

agreements with BNSF and UP <strong>to</strong> establish the South Coast Locomotives<br />

Program. The agreement sets a series of fleet performance measures that will<br />

“result in 100 percent replacement with the lower-emitting locomotives over<br />

31 Technical Highlights, Emission Fac<strong>to</strong>rs for Locomotives, US EPA EPA420-F-97-051, December 1997<br />

32 ibid<br />

33 Regula<strong>to</strong>ry Announcement – Final Emissions Standards for Locomotives, US EPA EPA420-F-97-048, December<br />

1997<br />

213

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!