03.03.2015 Views

California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2005</strong>-<strong>06</strong> – <strong>2015</strong>-<strong>16</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

• Non-Article XIX Revenues in the SHA - The TCRP Program (Chapter 91,<br />

Statutes of 2000) authorized the annual transfer, starting in 2001-02, of all<br />

non-Article XIX tax revenue funds in the SHA <strong>to</strong> the PTA. These SHA funds<br />

are derived from the sale of documents, charges for miscellaneous services <strong>to</strong><br />

the public, rental of <strong>State</strong> property, etc. In <strong>2005</strong>-<strong>06</strong> this source was<br />

$53 million.<br />

• TCRP Program/Proposition 42 Funding – The TCRP established by Chapter<br />

91, Statutes of 2000 (AB 2928, Torlakson) was intended <strong>to</strong> provide significant<br />

additional funding <strong>to</strong> a specific list of TCRP transportation projects and <strong>to</strong> the<br />

PTA from 2001-02 through <strong>2005</strong>-<strong>06</strong>. The major new source of funding was<br />

gasoline sales tax revenues that had previously gone <strong>to</strong> the GF and would<br />

instead go <strong>to</strong> the new Transportation Investment Fund (TIF). The PTA would<br />

receive 20 percent of this gasoline sales tax revenue. However, soon after the<br />

TCRP was enacted, the <strong>State</strong> experienced a fiscal crisis, and Chapter 112,<br />

Statutes of 2001 (AB 438) delayed the transfer of sales tax revenues <strong>to</strong> the TIF,<br />

<strong>to</strong> begin in 2003-04, and <strong>to</strong> continue through 2007-08.<br />

Then, Proposition 42 in March 2002 added Article XIX B <strong>to</strong> the <strong>California</strong><br />

Constitution that eliminated the original sunset date for the TIF and continued<br />

the original TCRP program through 2007-08. Also, beginning in 2008-09, it<br />

makes permanent the transfer of gasoline sales tax revenue <strong>to</strong> the TIF on a<br />

formula basis: 20 percent of the transfers will go the PTA with one-half of this<br />

amount for STIP projects, 40 percent <strong>to</strong> the SHA for STIP projects, and<br />

40 percent for subventions <strong>to</strong> cities and counties for local streets and roads.<br />

Starting in 2008-09, no further funds will go <strong>to</strong> TCRP projects, so formula<br />

funds <strong>to</strong> the PTA, STIP, and local streets and roads will increase. In 2003-04<br />

and 2004-05, the transfers were suspended and are required <strong>to</strong> be paid back by<br />

2008-09.<br />

The <strong>2005</strong>-<strong>06</strong> Budget for the first time provided the PTA funds from the TIF.<br />

$127 went <strong>to</strong> the PTA, with half ($63.5 million) of those funds for STIP<br />

projects and half ($63.5 million) for the STA Program.<br />

• “Spillover” – These revenues are available when revenues from the gasoline<br />

sales tax at the 4.75 percent rate exceed revenues from all taxable sales at the<br />

0.25 percent rate. This source was initiated when the sales tax on gasoline was<br />

established in 1972. For many years there was no spillover, but since 2002-03<br />

there has been a spillover as a result of high gas prices. However, the PTA did<br />

not receive any of these funds due <strong>to</strong> annual legislative action.<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!